Division of Digestive Endoscopy, Department of Medicine, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan.
Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Sep;39(9):1903-1909. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16616. Epub 2024 May 13.
Hot snare excision using electrocautery is widely used for large colorectal polyps (>10 mm); however, adverse events occur due to deep thermal injury. Colorectal polyps measuring 10-14 mm rarely include invasive cancer. Therefore, less invasive therapeutic options for this size category are demanding. We have developed hot snare polypectomy with low-power pure-cut current (LPPC HSP), which is expected to contribute to less deep thermal damage and lower risk of adverse events. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LPPC HSP for 10-14 mm colorectal polyps, compared with conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR).
In this multicenter, retrospective, observational study, clinical outcomes of EMR and LPPC HSP for 10-14 mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps between January 2021 and March 2022 were compared using propensity score matching.
We identified 203 EMR and 208 LPPC HSP cases. After propensity score matching, the baseline characteristics between the groups were comparable, with 120 pairs. The en bloc and R0 resection rates were not significantly different between EMR and LPPC HSP groups (95.8% vs 97.5%, P = 0.72; 90.0% vs 91.7%, P = 0.82). The rates of delayed bleeding and perforation did not differ between the groups.
Compared with conventional EMR, LPPC HSP showed a similar resection ability without an increase in adverse events. These results suggest that LPPC HSP is a safe and effective treatment for 10-14 mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps.
热圈套切除术联合电灼广泛应用于直径>10mm 的大肠大息肉;然而,由于深度热损伤,不良事件时有发生。直径 10-14mm 的大肠息肉很少包含浸润性癌。因此,对于这一尺寸范围内的息肉,人们需要采用创伤更小的治疗方法。我们开发了低功率纯切电流(LPPC)的热圈套息肉切除术(HSP),它有望减少深度热损伤和降低不良事件风险。本研究旨在评估 LPPC HSP 治疗直径 10-14mm 非息肉样大肠息肉的疗效和安全性,并与传统内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)进行比较。
本多中心、回顾性、观察性研究采用倾向评分匹配比较了 2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 3 月期间直径 10-14mm 无蒂大肠非息肉样息肉接受 EMR 和 LPPC HSP 治疗的临床结果。
共纳入 203 例 EMR 患者和 208 例 LPPC HSP 患者。经倾向评分匹配后,两组患者的基线特征具有可比性,共匹配 120 对。EMR 组和 LPPC HSP 组的整块切除率和完全切除率差异无统计学意义(95.8% vs 97.5%,P=0.72;90.0% vs 91.7%,P=0.82)。两组延迟出血和穿孔的发生率也无差异。
与传统 EMR 相比,LPPC HSP 的切除能力相似,不良事件发生率无增加。这些结果表明,LPPC HSP 是治疗直径 10-14mm 非息肉样大肠息肉的一种安全有效的方法。