Roy Shubhajeet, Gupta Shikhar S, Singh Utkarsh, Anand Rohit, Bhat Ganesh, Sooraj Rizhin, Raam Mithun, Aswinee Rahalkar, Ramakant Pooja, Singh Kul Ranjan, Misra Anand Kumar
Faculty of Medical Sciences, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh India.
Department of Endocrine Surgery, Shatabdi Phase II Hospital, King George's Medical University, Shah Mina Shah Road, Chowk, Lucknow, 226003 Uttar Pradesh India.
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun;15(2):437-445. doi: 10.1007/s13193-024-01923-z. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
Seroma formation is a common sequel following modified radical mastectomy (MRM), which hinders healing, may prolong hospital stay, and cause a delay in adjuvant treatment. Closed suction drains have been used to prevent formation of seroma; however, the use of a single drain in the axilla along with draining the mastectomy flaps and axilla separately remains a topic of debate. This prospective randomized dual-arm study was conducted in the Department of Endocrine Surgery. All female patients with carcinoma breast diagnosed on core tissue biopsy, undergoing modified radical mastectomy, upfront or post neoadjuvant systemic therapy were included. Patients were randomized into two groups. In the first group, a single drain was placed in the axilla whereas in the second group, a drain each was placed below the mastectomy flaps and the axilla. Patients' particulars and the weight of the mass excised along with the operative details were documented. The volume of the drain was recorded daily. The flap drain was removed on postoperative day 5 and the axillary drain was removed when the drain volume was less than 30 mL/24 h for 2 consecutive days. The period of drain placement, volume of drainage, volume of seroma (if formed), and other complications (if any) were recorded. Patients in the single drain group had a significantly earlier drain removal time as compared to those with double drains ( = 0.01). The number of patients in whom seroma formation had occurred was more in the double drain group, but the difference was not significant. The average volume of aspirated seroma fluid was insignificantly more in the single drain group. The only other complication noticed was flap necrosis-in 5% patients of the double drain group. Total volume of drainage ( < 0.0001) and type of drain ( = 0.0208) were associated with higher rates of seroma formation, whereas BMI ( = 0.0516), weight of excised breast mass ( = 0.407), and age ( = 0.6379) were not associated with the rate of seroma formation. Outcomes in terms of drain volume or seroma formation were statistically indifferent between the two groups. Still, use of only a single axillary drain should be promoted, keeping in mind the earlier drain removal period, better patient compliance, and reduced hospital stay.
血清肿形成是改良根治性乳房切除术(MRM)后的常见后遗症,它会妨碍伤口愈合,可能延长住院时间,并导致辅助治疗延迟。封闭式负压引流管已被用于预防血清肿的形成;然而,在腋窝使用单根引流管以及分别引流乳房切除皮瓣和腋窝仍然是一个有争议的话题。这项前瞻性随机双臂研究在内分泌外科进行。纳入所有经核心组织活检确诊为乳腺癌、接受改良根治性乳房切除术、术前或新辅助全身治疗后的女性患者。患者被随机分为两组。第一组在腋窝放置单根引流管,而第二组在乳房切除皮瓣下方和腋窝各放置一根引流管。记录患者的详细信息、切除肿块的重量以及手术细节。每天记录引流管的引流量。术后第5天拔除皮瓣引流管,当引流量连续2天小于30 mL/24小时时拔除腋窝引流管。记录引流管放置时间、引流量、血清肿体积(如果形成)以及其他并发症(如果有)。与双引流管组相比,单引流管组患者的引流管拔除时间明显更早(=0.01)。双引流管组血清肿形成的患者数量更多,但差异不显著。单引流管组吸出的血清肿液平均量略多,但差异不显著。唯一注意到的其他并发症是皮瓣坏死——双引流管组中有5%的患者出现。总引流量(<0.0001)和引流管类型(=0.0208)与血清肿形成率较高相关,而体重指数(=0.0516)、切除的乳房肿块重量(=0.407)和年龄(=0.6379)与血清肿形成率无关。两组在引流量或血清肿形成方面的结果在统计学上无差异。尽管如此,考虑到引流管拔除时间更早、患者依从性更好以及住院时间缩短,仍应提倡仅使用单根腋窝引流管。