Aragón Estívaliz, Menacho Inmaculada, Navarro José I, Aguilar Manuel
Department of Psychology, School of Education, University of Cádiz, Spain.
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 30;10(9):e29831. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29831. eCollection 2024 May 15.
Mathematics teaching strategies have a positive impact on learning. However, there is a lack of studies on non-traditional approaches to early mathematics education in the specialized scientific literature. In this theoretical framework, a study to connect teaching methodology with the various cognitive processes implicated in learning has been designed. A total of 114 primary school students aged 74 and 84 months who were taught mathematics either with the method called Open Algorithm Based on Numbers or with the more traditional Closed Algorithm Based on Ciphers, participated in the study. After conducting a thorough examination of cognitive processes and early math performance using well-established assessment instruments, a comparative analysis was undertaken to explore the relationship between cognitive predictors of mathematical performance, while considering the mathematics teaching strategies used. Students were distributed according to their level of mathematical competence and teaching methodology and the type of schools (Charter or Public). The results from the multivariate statistical test showed that the teaching strategy was inconclusive for most of the cognitive factors studied. Significant differences according to mathematical performance were found for fluid intelligence, verbal short-term memory, and visuospatial working memory. Finally, no significant differences were found in the cognitive variables studied when considering the interaction between the teaching approach, school characteristics, and mathematical achievement as a reference.
数学教学策略对学习有积极影响。然而,专业科学文献中缺乏关于早期数学教育非传统方法的研究。在此理论框架下,设计了一项将教学方法与学习中涉及的各种认知过程相联系的研究。共有114名年龄在74至84个月的小学生参与了该研究,他们分别接受了基于数字的开放算法或更传统的基于数字的封闭算法的数学教学。在使用成熟的评估工具对认知过程和早期数学表现进行全面检查后,进行了对比分析,以探讨数学表现的认知预测因素之间的关系,同时考虑所使用的数学教学策略。学生们根据其数学能力水平、教学方法和学校类型(特许学校或公立学校)进行了分组。多变量统计测试的结果表明,对于所研究的大多数认知因素,教学策略并无定论。在流体智力、言语短期记忆和视觉空间工作记忆方面,根据数学表现发现了显著差异。最后,在将教学方法、学校特征和数学成绩之间的相互作用作为参考来考虑时,在所研究的认知变量中未发现显著差异。
Heliyon. 2024-4-30
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020-6-9
J Exp Child Psychol. 2023-11
Psychol Rep. 2021-4
Scand J Psychol. 2016-12
Behav Sci (Basel). 2019-7-12