School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Department of Psychology, City, University of London, London, UK.
J Clin Psychol. 2024 Aug;80(8):1917-1936. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23701. Epub 2024 May 14.
Modern diagnostic and classification frameworks such as the ICD-11 and DSM-5-AMPD have adopted a dimensional approach to diagnosing personality disorder using a dual "severity" and "trait" model. As narcissistic personality has historically struggled to be adequately captured in dominant diagnostic systems, this study investigated the utility of the new ICD-11 framework in capturing diverse narcissistic expressions. Participants were mental health clinicians (N = 180, 67% female, age = 38.9), who completed ratings of ICD-11 personality severity, trait domains and a clinical reflection for two hypothetical case vignettes reflecting either prototypical "grandiose" or "vulnerable" narcissism. The majority of clinicians (82%) endorsed a diagnosis of personality disorder for both grandiose and vulnerable vignettes. Discriminant elements of personality impairment included rigid, unrealistically positive self-view, low empathy and high conflict with others for grandiosity, and incoherent identity, low self-esteem and hypervigilant, avoidant relations with others for vulnerability. Regarding trait profile, grandiose narcissism was predominately dissocial whereas vulnerable narcissism was primarily associated with negative affectivity and detachment. Qualitative responses highlight distinct clinical themes for each presentation. These findings suggest that clinicians using the ICD-11 framework are able to identify common core elements of personality dysfunction in grandiose and vulnerable narcissism while also recognizing their distinctive differences.
现代诊断和分类框架,如 ICD-11 和 DSM-5-AMPD,采用了一种维度方法来诊断人格障碍,使用双重“严重程度”和“特质”模型。由于自恋型人格障碍在主导诊断系统中一直难以被充分捕捉,本研究调查了新的 ICD-11 框架在捕捉各种自恋表现方面的效用。参与者是心理健康临床医生(N=180,67%为女性,年龄=38.9),他们对两个假设的案例进行了 ICD-11 人格严重程度、特质域和临床反思的评分,这两个案例反映了典型的“浮夸”或“脆弱”自恋。大多数临床医生(82%)对浮夸和脆弱案例都诊断为人格障碍。人格障碍的判别要素包括僵化、不切实际的积极自我观念、同理心低、与他人冲突高,以及身份不连贯、自尊低、与他人关系警惕和回避,这些都是浮夸的特点。脆弱自恋的特点主要是负面情感和与他人的分离。定性反应突出了每种表现的不同临床主题。这些发现表明,使用 ICD-11 框架的临床医生能够识别浮夸和脆弱自恋中人格功能障碍的常见核心要素,同时也认识到它们的独特差异。