Suppr超能文献

强制控制与亲密伴侣暴力:与人格障碍严重程度及病理性自恋的关系

Coercive Control and Intimate Partner Violence: Relationship With Personality Disorder Severity and Pathological Narcissism.

作者信息

J S Day Nicholas, Kealy David, Biberdzic Marko, Green Ava, Denmeade Georgia, Grenyer Brin F S

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.

Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

Personal Ment Health. 2025 Nov;19(4):e70038. doi: 10.1002/pmh.70038.

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a global health concern, with increasing efforts focused on detection and prevention. Coercive control has been identified as a 'golden thread' linking risk profiles and violence perpetration. Narcissistic pathology is often implicated in control and violence, but research linking narcissism with aggression and abuse has been inconsistent. Most research on narcissism focuses on symptomatology, whereas contemporary diagnostic frameworks emphasise a dimensional approach to personality disorder 'severity'. No study has examined the association between pathological narcissism, violence and coercive control while accounting for overall personality pathology. Individuals in relationships with relatives high in narcissism (N = 135; 71% romantic partners, 22% family members; average relationship length = 20 years) completed informant measures of pathological narcissism and personality disorder severity, as well as self-report measures of abuse and coercive control. Relatives were rated highly in both grandiose and vulnerable narcissism features, as well as displaying prominent impairments in personality functioning. Correlation analysis indicated dimensional personality disorder severity was significantly and moderately associated with both abuse and coercive control. Pathological narcissism was significantly associated with coercive control but not abuse. Specific narcissism subfactors (exploitativeness, grandiose fantasy and entitlement rage) showed positive, weak associations with either coercive control or abuse. Within the context of high narcissistic symptomatology, personality disorder severity may be a risk factor for coercive control and IPV. Clinical implications suggest the relevance of incorporating a focus on personality in psychological interventions targeted at reducing IPV and coercive control.

摘要

亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)是一个全球健康问题,人们越来越多地致力于其检测和预防。强制控制已被确定为连接风险特征和暴力行为的“关键线索”。自恋病理常与控制和暴力有关,但将自恋与攻击和虐待联系起来的研究并不一致。大多数关于自恋的研究都集中在症状学上,而当代诊断框架强调对人格障碍“严重程度”采用维度方法。尚无研究在考虑整体人格病理的情况下,考察病理性自恋、暴力和强制控制之间的关联。与自恋程度高的亲属有关系的个体(N = 135;71%为浪漫伴侣,22%为家庭成员;平均关系长度 = 20年)完成了病理性自恋和人格障碍严重程度的知情者测量,以及虐待和强制控制的自我报告测量。亲属在夸大和脆弱自恋特征方面得分都很高,并且在人格功能方面表现出明显的损害。相关分析表明,维度人格障碍严重程度与虐待和强制控制均显著且中度相关。病理性自恋与强制控制显著相关,但与虐待无关。特定的自恋子因素(剥削性、夸大幻想和权利愤怒)与强制控制或虐待呈微弱的正相关。在自恋症状严重的背景下,人格障碍严重程度可能是强制控制和亲密伴侣暴力的一个风险因素。临床意义表明,在旨在减少亲密伴侣暴力和强制控制的心理干预中纳入对人格的关注具有相关性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验