Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, UK.
School of Public Finance and Management, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, China.
AIDS. 2024 Aug 1;38(10):1533-1542. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003924. Epub 2024 May 14.
Interruptions in care of people with HIV (PWH) on antiretroviral therapy (ART) are associated with adverse outcomes, but most studies have relied on composite outcomes. We investigated whether mortality risk following care interruptions differed from mortality risk after first starting ART.
Collaboration of 18 European and North American HIV observational cohort studies of adults with HIV starting ART between 2004 and 2019.
Care interruptions were defined as gaps in contact of ≥365 days, with a subsequent return to care (distinct from loss to follow-up), or ≥270 days and ≥545 days in sensitivity analyses. Follow-up time was allocated to no/preinterruption or postinterruption follow-up groups. We used Cox regression to compare hazards of mortality between care interruption groups, adjusting for time-updated demographic and clinical characteristics and biomarkers upon ART initiation or re-initiation of care.
Of 89 197 PWH, 83.4% were male and median age at ART start was 39 years [interquartile range (IQR): 31-48)]. 8654 PWH (9.7%) had ≥1 care interruption; 10 913 episodes of follow-up following a care interruption were included. There were 6104 deaths in 536 334 person-years, a crude mortality rate of 11.4 [95% confidence interval (CI): 11.1-11.7] per 1000 person-years. The adjusted mortality hazard ratio (HR) for the postinterruption group was 1.72 (95% CI: 1.57-1.88) compared with the no/preinterruption group. Results were robust to sensitivity analyses assuming ≥270-day (HR 1.49, 95% CI: 1.40-1.60) and ≥545-day (HR 1.67, 95% CI: 1.48-1.88) interruptions.
Mortality was higher among PWH reinitiating care following an interruption, compared with when PWH initially start ART, indicating the importance of uninterrupted care.
接受抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)的艾滋病毒感染者(PLWHA)的护理中断与不良结局相关,但大多数研究都依赖于综合结局。我们研究了护理中断后与首次开始 ART 后相比,死亡率风险是否有所不同。
合作了 18 个欧洲和北美艾滋病毒观察队列研究,纳入了 2004 年至 2019 年期间开始接受 ART 的成年 PLWHA。
护理中断被定义为≥365 天的接触空白期,随后返回护理(与失访不同),或≥270 天和≥545 天的敏感度分析。随访时间分配到无/预中断或中断后随访组。我们使用 Cox 回归比较了护理中断组之间的死亡率风险,调整了 ART 起始或重新开始护理时的时间更新的人口统计学和临床特征以及生物标志物。
在 89197 名 PLWHA 中,83.4%为男性,ART 开始时的中位年龄为 39 岁[四分位距(IQR):31-48]。8654 名 PLWHA(9.7%)有≥1 次护理中断;10913 次随访发生在护理中断后。在 536334 人年中,有 6104 人死亡,粗死亡率为 11.4[95%置信区间(CI):11.1-11.7]每 1000 人年。与无/预中断组相比,中断后组的调整死亡率危险比(HR)为 1.72(95%CI:1.57-1.88)。假设≥270 天(HR1.49,95%CI:1.40-1.60)和≥545 天(HR1.67,95%CI:1.48-1.88)中断的敏感性分析结果也是稳健的。
与首次开始 ART 相比,PLWHA 中断后重新开始护理的死亡率更高,这表明不间断护理的重要性。