School of Civil Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an, 710055, China; Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Space Engineering (XAUAT), Xi'an, 710055, China.
Professor in Geotechnical Engineering, UniSA, STEM, ScaRCE, University of South Australia, SA 5000, Australia.
J Environ Manage. 2024 Jun;360:121100. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121100. Epub 2024 May 13.
Removal of heavy metals using the electrokinetic (EK) remediation technology is restricted by soils containing a fraction of clay particles above 12%. Furthermore, it is also affected by hydroxide precipitation (focusing phenomenon) close to the cathode. A modified EK reactor containing a permeable reactive barrier (PRB) was proposed herein where the enzyme-induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) treatment was incorporated into the PRB. Despite that, NH-N pollution induced by the urea hydrolysis resulting from the EICP treatment causes serious threats to surrounding environments and human health. There were four types of tests applied to the present work, including CP, TS1, TS2, and TS3 tests. CP test neglected the bio-PRB, while TS1 test considered the bio-PRB. TS2 test based on TS1 test tackled NH-N pollution using the struvite precipitation technology. TS3 test based on TS2 test applied EDDS to enhance the removal of Cu and Pb. In CP test, the removal efficiency applied to Cu and Pb removals was as low as approximately 10%, presumably due to the focusing phenomenon. The removal efficiency was elevated to approximately 24% when the bio-PRB and the electrolyte reservoir were involved in TS1 test. TS2 test indicated that the rate of struvite precipitation was 40 times faster than the ureolysis rate, meaning that the struvite precipitate had sequestered NH before it started threatening surrounding environments. The chelation between Cu and EDDS took place when EDDS played a part in TS3 test. It made Cu negatively surface charged by transforming Cu into EDDSCu. The chelation caused those left in S4 and S4 to migrate toward the bio-PRB, whereas it also caused those left in S1 and S2 to migrate toward the anode. Due to this reason, the fraction of Cu removed by the bio-PRB and the electrolyte reservoir is raised to 32% and 26% respectively, and the fraction of remaining Cu was reduced to 41%. Also, the removal efficiency applied to Pb removal was raised to 50%. Results demonstrate the potential of struvite and EDDS-assisted EK-PRB technology as a cleanup method for Cu- and Pb-contaminated loess.
利用电动修复(EK)技术去除重金属受到限制,因为土壤中含有超过 12%的粘土颗粒。此外,它还受到阴极附近氢氧化物沉淀(聚焦现象)的影响。本文提出了一种改良的 EK 反应器,其中包含可渗透反应屏障(PRB),并将酶诱导碳酸沉淀(EICP)处理纳入 PRB。尽管如此,由于 EICP 处理中尿素水解产生的 NH-N 污染对周围环境和人类健康造成了严重威胁。本工作进行了四种类型的测试,包括 CP、TS1、TS2 和 TS3 测试。CP 测试忽略了生物-PRB,而 TS1 测试则考虑了生物-PRB。TS2 测试基于 TS1 测试,利用鸟粪石沉淀技术解决 NH-N 污染问题。TS3 测试基于 TS2 测试,应用 EDDS 增强 Cu 和 Pb 的去除。在 CP 测试中,Cu 和 Pb 去除的去除效率低至约 10%,这可能是由于聚焦现象。当涉及生物-PRB 和电解质储液器时,TS1 测试的去除效率提高到约 24%。TS2 测试表明,鸟粪石沉淀的速度比尿素水解的速度快 40 倍,这意味着在开始威胁周围环境之前,鸟粪石沉淀物已经将 NH 隔离。当 EDDS 在 TS3 测试中发挥作用时,Cu 与 EDDS 发生螯合作用。它通过将 Cu 转化为 EDDSCu,使 Cu 带负电荷。螯合作用使 S4 和 S4 中剩余的 Cu 迁移到生物-PRB,同时也使 S1 和 S2 中剩余的 Cu 迁移到阳极。由于这个原因,生物-PRB 和电解质储液器去除的 Cu 分数分别提高到 32%和 26%,剩余 Cu 的分数减少到 41%。此外,Pb 去除的去除效率提高到 50%。结果表明,鸟粪石和 EDDS 辅助 EK-PRB 技术作为一种去除黄土中 Cu 和 Pb 污染的方法具有潜力。