Cellular and Gene Editing Research, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.
Experimental Cancer Genetics, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK; Department of Dermatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Cell Rep Methods. 2024 May 20;4(5):100776. doi: 10.1016/j.crmeth.2024.100776. Epub 2024 May 13.
Continual advancements in genomics have led to an ever-widening disparity between the rate of discovery of genetic variants and our current understanding of their functions and potential roles in disease. Systematic methods for phenotyping DNA variants are required to effectively translate genomics data into improved outcomes for patients with genetic diseases. To make the biggest impact, these approaches must be scalable and accurate, faithfully reflect disease biology, and define complex disease mechanisms. We compare current methods to analyze the function of variants in their endogenous DNA context using genome editing strategies, such as saturation genome editing, base editing and prime editing. We discuss how these technologies can be linked to high-content readouts to gain deep mechanistic insights into variant effects. Finally, we highlight key challenges that need to be addressed to bridge the genotype to phenotype gap, and ultimately improve the diagnosis and treatment of genetic diseases.
基因组学的不断进步导致遗传变异的发现速度与我们目前对其功能和在疾病中的潜在作用的理解之间的差距越来越大。需要系统的方法来对 DNA 变异进行表型分析,以便将基因组学数据有效地转化为改善遗传疾病患者的治疗效果。为了产生最大的影响,这些方法必须具有可扩展性和准确性,忠实地反映疾病生物学,并定义复杂的疾病机制。我们比较了目前使用基因组编辑策略(如饱和基因组编辑、碱基编辑和先导编辑)来分析变体在其内源性 DNA 环境中的功能的方法。我们讨论了如何将这些技术与高内涵读数相结合,以深入了解变体效应的机制。最后,我们强调了需要解决的关键挑战,以弥合基因型与表型之间的差距,并最终改善遗传疾病的诊断和治疗。