Prost Max, Denz Philip, Windolf Joachim, Konieczny Markus Rafael
Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Int J Spine Surg. 2024 Jul 4;18(3):322-328. doi: 10.14444/8602.
Surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis from the posterior approach can be performed by the "all screws" technique; hybrid technique with screws and hooks; hybrid technique or with screws, hooks, and tapes; or selective fusion (SF) or nonselective fusion (NSF). The aim of the present investigation was to analyze the influence from different operative techniques on frontal curve correction and sagittal profile in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
We conducted a retrospective analysis on 55 consecutive patients with scoliosis who had been treated by posterior instrumented fusion. We collected demographic data and analyzed pre- and postoperative radiographs. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25. Because data showed normal distribution, tests were performed.
Twenty-two patients were treated using the hybrid technique with screws and hooks; 25 were treated using the hybrid technique with screws, hooks, and tape; and 8 were treated using the all screws technique. An SF was performed in 32 patients and NSF in 23 patients. There was no significant difference with regard to curve correction of the main curve between the different techniques. Correction of the minor curve was significantly higher in NSF than in SF patients. In SF, there was a correction of the minor curve of 43.9%. Impact on sagittal balance showed no significant differences between NSF and SF.
The different operative techniques did not show a difference with regard to the correction of the main curve. NSF showed a significantly higher degree of correction of the minor curve than SF. However, we still found a correction of 43.9% of the noninstrumented minor curve in SF. Thus, SF and hybrid techniques do not lead to inferior radiographic outcome.
SF and hybrid techniques are safe and effective techniques that could be used as an alternative to NSF and all screw fixation in the operative treatment for scoliosis.
青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的后路手术矫正可采用“全螺钉”技术;螺钉与钩的混合技术;螺钉、钩与钛缆的混合技术;或选择性融合(SF)或非选择性融合(NSF)。本研究的目的是分析不同手术技术对青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者前路曲线矫正和矢状面形态的影响。
我们对55例接受后路器械融合治疗的脊柱侧凸患者进行了回顾性分析。我们收集了人口统计学数据,并分析了术前和术后的X线片。使用SPSS 25版进行统计分析。由于数据呈正态分布,因此进行了检验。
22例患者采用螺钉与钩的混合技术治疗;25例采用螺钉、钩与钛缆的混合技术治疗;8例采用全螺钉技术治疗。32例行选择性融合,23例行非选择性融合。不同技术之间主弯的曲线矫正无显著差异。非选择性融合患者的次弯矫正显著高于选择性融合患者。在选择性融合中,次弯矫正率为43.9%。对矢状面平衡的影响在非选择性融合和选择性融合之间无显著差异。
不同手术技术在主弯矫正方面无差异。非选择性融合的次弯矫正程度显著高于选择性融合。然而,我们仍发现选择性融合中非固定次弯的矫正率为43.9%。因此,选择性融合和混合技术不会导致较差的影像学结果。
选择性融合和混合技术是安全有效的技术,可作为非选择性融合和全螺钉固定治疗脊柱侧凸的替代方法。