Department of Psychology and Zelman Center of Neuroscience, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, 84105, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024 Aug;24(4):681-693. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01194-9. Epub 2024 May 14.
Conscious reportable (un)pleasantness feelings were shown to be successfully described by a process in which evidence favoring pleasant and unpleasant feelings accumulates until one response wins the race. This approach is challenged by (a) insufficient specification of "evidence," and (b) incomplete verification that participants report their truly experienced (un)pleasant feelings and not what they expect to feel. In each trial in this preregistered experiment, the (un)pleasant feeling reports regarding emotion evoking pictures was embedded in a period when participants expected a low-effort task (feature visual search) or a high-effort task (feature-conjunction search). Fitting the Linear Ballistic Accumulator model to the feeling report data shows that anticipated effort was associated with a higher rate of unpleasant evidence accumulation, but only when the emotion evoking pictures were normatively unpleasant and not when they were normatively pleasant. These results suggest that anticipated effort may be one source of "evidence," but only given a certain interpretation of the findings, and that genuinely felt emotions contribute to the emotion reports, assuming that participants intended to react to the pictures, as instructed, and not to the anticipated effort.
有意识的可报告的(不)愉快感觉被证明可以通过一个过程来成功描述,在这个过程中,支持愉快和不愉快感觉的证据积累起来,直到一种反应赢得比赛。这种方法受到了以下两个方面的挑战:(a)“证据”的说明不充分,(b)参与者报告他们真正经历的(不)愉快感觉而不是他们预期的感觉的验证不完全。在这个预先注册的实验的每个试验中,情绪诱发图片的(不)愉快感觉报告被嵌入到一个参与者预期低努力任务(特征视觉搜索)或高努力任务(特征联合搜索)的时期。将线性弹道累积器模型拟合到感觉报告数据中表明,预期的努力与不愉快证据积累的速度呈正相关,但只有当情绪诱发图片在规范上是不愉快的,而不是规范上是愉快的情况下才会如此。这些结果表明,预期的努力可能是“证据”的一个来源,但这只是在对发现的某种解释的前提下,并且假设参与者打算按照指示对图片做出反应,而不是对预期的努力做出反应,那么真正感受到的情绪会对情绪报告做出贡献。