Suppr超能文献

内镜听骨成形术即刻应用于听骨链中断的有效性。

Validity of endoscopic ossiculoplasty immediately after its introduction for ossicular chain disruption.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, North 15, West 7, Kita-Ku, Hokkaido, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2024 May 14;24(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02445-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transcanal endoscopic ear surgery (TEES) reportedly requires a long learning curve and may be associated with more complications and longer operative times than microscopic ear surgery (MES). In this study, we aimed to examine the usefulness and validity of TEES for ossicular chain disruption in the early stages of its introduction in our institution.

METHODS

TEES was performed on 11 ears (10 with congenital ossicular chain discontinuity and 1 with traumatic ossicular chain dislocation), and MES was performed with a retroauricular incision on 18 ears (6 with congenital ossicular chain discontinuity and 12 with traumatic ossicular chain dislocation) in a tertiary referral center. Postoperative hearing results, operative times, and postoperative hospital length of stay were retrospectively reviewed. The Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test was performed to compare variables between the TEES and MES groups. Pre- and postoperative air- and bone-conduction thresholds and the air-bone gap of each group were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The Mann-Whitney U test and Wilcoxon signed-rank was performed to compare the pre- and postoperative air-bone gaps between the diagnoses.

RESULTS

No significant differences in the postoperative air-conduction thresholds, bone-conduction thresholds, air-bone gaps, or incidence of air-bone gap ≤ 20 dB were observed between the TEES and MES groups. The air-conduction thresholds and air-bone gaps of the TEES group significantly improved postoperatively. The air-conduction thresholds and air-bone gaps of the MES group also significantly improved postoperatively. No significant difference was observed in the operative times between the groups (TEES group: median, 80 min; MES group: median, 85.5 min). The TEES group had a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay (median, 2 days) than the MES group (median, 7.5 days).

CONCLUSIONS

TEES was considered appropriate for the treatment of ossicular chain disruption, even immediately after its introduction at our institution. For expert microscopic ear surgeons, ossicular chain disruption may be considered a suitable indication for the introduction of TEES.

摘要

背景

经 外耳道内镜耳科手术(TEES)据称需要较长的学习曲线,并且与显微镜下耳科手术(MES)相比,可能与更多的并发症和更长的手术时间相关。在这项研究中,我们旨在检查 TEES 在我们机构引入的早期阶段对听小骨链中断的有用性和有效性。

方法

在一家三级转诊中心,TEES 用于 11 耳(10 例先天性听小骨链不连续,1 例外伤性听小骨链脱位),MES 采用耳后切口用于 18 耳(6 例先天性听小骨链不连续,12 例外伤性听小骨链脱位)。回顾性分析术后听力结果、手术时间和术后住院时间。采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验和 Fisher 确切检验比较 TEES 组和 MES 组之间的变量。采用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验比较每组的术前和术后气导和骨导阈值以及气骨间隙。采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验比较两组诊断的术前和术后气骨间隙。

结果

TEES 组和 MES 组术后气导听阈、骨导听阈、气骨间隙以及气骨间隙≤20dB 的发生率无显著差异。TEES 组术后气导听阈和气骨间隙明显改善。MES 组术后气导听阈和气骨间隙也明显改善。两组手术时间无显著差异(TEES 组:中位数 80min;MES 组:中位数 85.5min)。TEES 组术后住院时间(中位数 2 天)明显短于 MES 组(中位数 7.5 天)。

结论

TEES 被认为适合治疗听小骨链中断,即使在我们机构引入后立即进行。对于经验丰富的显微镜耳科医生,听小骨链中断可能是引入 TEES 的合适适应证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/961e/11091995/c91fe5a529fd/12893_2024_2445_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验