• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为新教员实施机器人肝胆胰外科项目:安全性、可行性及经验教训

Implementing a Robotic Hepatopancreatobiliary Program for New Faculty: Safety, Feasibility and Lessons Learned.

作者信息

Niemann Britney, Kenney Christopher, Wallis Marsh J, Schmidt Carl, Boone Brian A

机构信息

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, West Virginia University.

出版信息

Res Sq. 2024 Apr 24:rs.3.rs-4271384. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4271384/v1.

DOI:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4271384/v1
PMID:38746355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11092865/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robotic surgery is increasingly utilized in hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery, but the learning curve is a substantial obstacle hindering implementation. Comprehensive robotic training can help to surmount this obstacle; however, despite the expansion of robotic training into residency and fellowship programs, limited data is available about how this translates into successful incorporation in faculty practice.

METHODS

All operations performed during the first three years of practice of a complex general surgical oncology-trained surgical oncologist at a tertiary care academic institution were retrospectively reviewed. The surgeon underwent comprehensive robotic training during residency and fellowship.

RESULTS

137 HPB operations were performed during the initial three years of practice. Over 80% were performed robotically each year across a spectrum of HPB procedures with a 6% conversion rate. Median operative time, the optimal metric for operative proficiency and evaluation for a learning curve, was similar throughout the study period for each major operation and below several reported optimized operative times. Major complications were similar across the experience and comparable to published series.

CONCLUSION

Comprehensive robotic training in residency and fellowship as well as a dedicated, well-trained operative team allows for early attainment of optimized outcomes in a new HPB robotic practice.

摘要

背景

机器人手术在肝胰胆(HPB)手术中的应用日益广泛,但学习曲线是阻碍其实施的一个重大障碍。全面的机器人培训有助于克服这一障碍;然而,尽管机器人培训已扩展到住院医师和专科培训项目,但关于这如何转化为成功融入教师实践的数据有限。

方法

对一位在三级医疗学术机构接受复杂普通外科肿瘤学培训的外科肿瘤学家执业的前三年中进行的所有手术进行回顾性审查。该外科医生在住院医师和专科培训期间接受了全面的机器人培训。

结果

在执业的最初三年中进行了137例HPB手术。每年超过80%的手术通过机器人进行,涵盖一系列HPB手术,转化率为6%。中位手术时间是衡量手术熟练程度和学习曲线评估的最佳指标,在整个研究期间,每种主要手术的中位手术时间相似,且低于一些报道的优化手术时间。不同经验阶段的主要并发症相似,与已发表系列相当。

结论

住院医师和专科培训中的全面机器人培训以及一个专注、训练有素的手术团队,使得在新的HPB机器人手术实践中能够早期获得优化结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2a6/11092865/85d6ad0f68d2/nihpp-rs4271384v1-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2a6/11092865/3b809bd405ff/nihpp-rs4271384v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2a6/11092865/8025c2ef13d5/nihpp-rs4271384v1-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2a6/11092865/85d6ad0f68d2/nihpp-rs4271384v1-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2a6/11092865/3b809bd405ff/nihpp-rs4271384v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2a6/11092865/8025c2ef13d5/nihpp-rs4271384v1-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2a6/11092865/85d6ad0f68d2/nihpp-rs4271384v1-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementing a Robotic Hepatopancreatobiliary Program for New Faculty: Safety, Feasibility and Lessons Learned.为新教员实施机器人肝胆胰外科项目:安全性、可行性及经验教训
Res Sq. 2024 Apr 24:rs.3.rs-4271384. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4271384/v1.
2
Implementing a robotic hepatopancreatobiliary program for new faculty: safety, feasibility and lessons learned.为新教员实施机器人肝胆胰计划:安全性、可行性和经验教训。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jun 15;18(1):253. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02011-8.
3
What to expect when you're expecting a hepatopancreatobiliary surgeon: self-reported experiences of HPB surgeons from different training pathways.当你期待一位肝胰胆外科医生时会有什么期待:来自不同培训途径的肝胰胆外科医生的自我报告经历。
HPB (Oxford). 2015 Sep;17(9):785-90. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12430. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
4
Should Robotic Surgery Training Be Prioritized in General Surgery Residency? A Survey of Fellowship Program Director Perspectives.普通外科住院医师培训中应优先进行机器人手术培训吗?对专科培训项目主任观点的调查。
J Surg Educ. 2020 Nov-Dec;77(6):e245-e250. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.07.025. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
5
Evolution of a Novel Robotic Training Curriculum in a Complex General Surgical Oncology Fellowship.新型机器人培训课程在普外科肿瘤学专科培训中的演变。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Nov;25(12):3445-3452. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6686-0. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
6
Overcoming the Arduous Transition for Robotic Hepatopancreatobiliary Cases: A Multi-Procedure Learning Curve Study Utilizing CUSUM Analysis.克服机器人肝胆胰案例的艰难过渡:利用累积和分析的多程序学习曲线研究。
World J Surg. 2021 Mar;45(3):865-872. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05861-z. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
7
Checking Our Blind Spots: Examining Characteristics of Interviewees Versus Matriculants to a Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgical Fellowship Program.检查我们的盲点:检查肝胰胆外科住院医师培训项目面试者和入学申请者的特征。
J Surg Educ. 2023 Nov;80(11):1582-1591. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.04.013. Epub 2023 May 12.
8
The adequacy of hepatopancreatobiliary training: How does operative exposure and perceived readiness in fellowship translate into subsequent practice?肝胰胆外科培训的充分性:专科培训中的手术暴露和自我感知的准备程度如何转化为后续的临床实践?
Can J Surg. 2017 Apr;60(2):140-143. doi: 10.1503/cjs.014216.
9
Expectations of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Fellows; Do We Meet Them?对肝胰胆专科住院医师的期望;我们能满足这些期望吗?
J Surg Educ. 2019 Nov-Dec;76(6):1546-1555. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.06.009. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
10
Perception of training in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery among general surgery residents in the Americas.美洲普通外科住院医师对肝胆胰外科培训的认知
HPB (Oxford). 2016 Dec;18(12):1039-1045. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Oct 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Robot-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy in Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: An International, Retrospective, Cohort Study.机器人辅助与腹腔镜下胰体尾切除术治疗可切除胰腺癌患者的国际回顾性队列研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 May;30(5):3023-3032. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-13054-2. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
2
Laparoscopic versus Robotic Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腹腔镜与机器人肝切除术:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 30;11(19):5831. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195831.
3
Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Increased Adoption and Improved Outcomes: Is Laparoscopy Still Justified?
机器人胰十二指肠切除术:采用率增加和结局改善:腹腔镜手术是否仍有理由?
Ann Surg. 2023 Sep 1;278(3):e563-e569. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005687. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
4
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Left and Extended Left Hepatectomy: An International Multicenter Study Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.机器人与腹腔镜左半肝及扩大左半肝切除术:国际多中心倾向评分匹配分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec;29(13):8398-8406. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12216-6. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
5
Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Robotic and Laparoscopic Right and Extended Right Hepatectomy.倾向评分匹配分析比较机器人与腹腔镜右半肝及右三叶切除术。
JAMA Surg. 2022 May 1;157(5):436-444. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.0161.
6
Mentorship and formal robotic proficiency skills curriculum improve subsequent generations' learning curve for the robotic distal pancreatectomy.导师指导和正式的机器人操作熟练技能课程可改善后代进行机器人远端胰腺切除术的学习曲线。
HPB (Oxford). 2021 Dec;23(12):1849-1855. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.04.022. Epub 2021 May 5.
7
Formal robotic training diminishes the learning curve for robotic pancreatoduodenectomy: Implications for new programs in complex robotic surgery.规范化机器人培训可缩短机器人胰十二指肠切除术的学习曲线:对复杂机器人手术中新开展项目的启示。
J Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb;123(2):375-380. doi: 10.1002/jso.26284. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
8
Stepwise implementation of robotic surgery in a high volume HPB practice in the Netherlands.荷兰一家高容量肝胆胰外科实践中机器人手术的逐步实施。
HPB (Oxford). 2020 Nov;22(11):1596-1603. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.01.018. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
9
Trends in the Adoption of Robotic Surgery for Common Surgical Procedures.常见手术中机器人手术采用趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1918911. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18911.
10
500 Minimally Invasive Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomies: One Decade of Optimizing Performance.500 例微创机器人胰十二指肠切除术:十年优化成果。
Ann Surg. 2021 May 1;273(5):966-972. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003550.