• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同伴主导的干预措施对改善老年护理机构中护工与工作相关的心理社会状况及减少人员流失的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

The effectiveness of peer-led interventions to improve work-related psychosocial outcomes and reduce turnover of support workers in residential aged care: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Czuba Karol J, Vandal Alain C, Czuba Frances M, Kayes Nicola M

机构信息

Centre for Person Centred Research, Auckland University of Technology, Northcote, Auckland 0627, New Zealand.

Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2023 Oct 15;5:100158. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100158. eCollection 2023 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100158
PMID:38746566
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11080450/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Support workers are central to the delivery of residential aged care, but the workforce is facing increasing work demands and widespread shortages. This contributes to high rates of burnout, decreased job satisfaction and high staff turnover. Peer-led interventions are reported to be effective but it is necessary to use evidence-based interventions to support this key workforce group.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the scientific evidence on effectiveness of strategies improving psychosocial and turnover-related outcomes for support workers in aged care that could be incorporated into a peer-led intervention.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analyses of experimental and quasi-experimental studies.

SETTING

Residential aged care.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted using MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE (via Scopus), and CINAHL (via EBSCO). We included studies examining the effectiveness of workplace interventions aiming to reduce aged care support workers' turnover rates and/or improve their work-related psychosocial outcomes (such as work stress, job satisfaction, self-esteem, and other). A number of meta-analyses using a mixed-effects model were performed to calculate standardized mean differences and odds ratios.

RESULTS

Fifty-one studies were included: 15 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), 19 non-RCTs and 17 Pre-Post studies. Most of the studies were rated as having 'high' or 'very high risk of bias'. The studies were clustered by intervention type: 1) knowledge-based, 2) interpersonal skills-based, 3) team-building, and 4) self-care. Knowledge-based interventions were the most used approach, with 26 studies in this category, and frequently reported improvements in stress- and satisfaction-related outcomes. There were twelve interpersonal skills-based and nine team-building interventions, which often reported decreased work stress, staff turnover, and intention to quit. There were four self-care interventions of which only one reported improvements in stress-related outcomes. Meta-analyses showed that only knowledge-based interventions resulted in statistically significant improvements: lower staff turnover rates (OR 0.47, 95 %CI: 0.37, 060), and higher scores for job/life satisfaction (SMD 0.26, 95 % CI: 0.05, 0.46) and staff attitude (SMD 0.23, 95 % CI: 0.05, 0.45).

CONCLUSION

This review found numerous strategies that have been trialled to improve support workers' psychosocial- and turnover-related outcomes. Most studies reported improvements in outcomes. However, our meta-analyses suggest that the effect sizes were small and mostly non-significant, with the evidence being of low certainty. The evidence for effectiveness of knowledge-based interventions appears the most convincing, with statistically significant improvements reported for turnover rates, job/life satisfaction and staff attitude. More high-quality studies are needed to consolidate the existing evidence.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42017059007; 02 June 2017.Tweetable abstract: Knowledge-based interventions most promising in improving support workers' outcomes in aged care. #agedcare #staffturnover.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e434/11080450/63beb92ffe59/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e434/11080450/63beb92ffe59/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e434/11080450/63beb92ffe59/gr1.jpg
摘要

背景

护工是提供住宿型老年护理服务的核心力量,但该劳动力群体正面临日益增加的工作需求和普遍的人员短缺问题。这导致了职业倦怠率高、工作满意度下降和员工流动率高。据报道,同伴主导的干预措施是有效的,但有必要采用基于证据的干预措施来支持这一关键劳动力群体。

目的

本研究旨在评估改善老年护理护工心理社会和与离职相关结果的策略有效性的科学证据,这些策略可纳入同伴主导的干预措施。

设计

对实验性和准实验性研究进行系统评价和荟萃分析。

设置

住宿型老年护理机构。

方法

使用MEDLINE(通过PubMed)、EMBASE(通过Scopus)和CINAHL(通过EBSCO)进行系统的文献综述。我们纳入了研究旨在降低老年护理护工离职率和/或改善其与工作相关的心理社会结果(如工作压力、工作满意度、自尊等)的工作场所干预措施有效性的研究。使用混合效应模型进行了多项荟萃分析,以计算标准化平均差和比值比。

结果

纳入了51项研究:15项随机对照试验(RCT)、19项非随机对照试验和17项前后对照研究。大多数研究被评为具有“高”或“非常高的偏倚风险”。这些研究按干预类型进行聚类:1)基于知识的,2)基于人际技能的,3)团队建设的,4)自我护理的。基于知识的干预措施是最常用的方法,此类有26项研究,并且经常报告与压力和满意度相关的结果有所改善。有12项基于人际技能的干预措施和9项团队建设干预措施,这些措施经常报告工作压力、员工流动率和离职意愿有所降低。有4项自我护理干预措施,其中只有1项报告与压力相关的结果有所改善。荟萃分析表明,只有基于知识的干预措施产生了统计学上显著的改善:较低的员工流动率(OR 0.47,95%CI:0.37,0.60),以及更高的工作/生活满意度得分(SMD 0.26,95%CI:0.05,0.46)和员工态度得分(SMD 0.23,95%CI:0.05,0.45)。

结论

本综述发现了许多已试验过的改善护工心理社会和与离职相关结果的策略。大多数研究报告结果有所改善。然而,我们的荟萃分析表明,效应量较小且大多不显著,证据的确定性较低。基于知识的干预措施有效性的证据似乎最有说服力,报告显示在流动率、工作/生活满意度和员工态度方面有统计学上显著的改善。需要更多高质量的研究来巩固现有证据。

PROSPERO注册号:CRD42017059007;2017年6月2日。可发推文的摘要:基于知识的干预措施在改善老年护理护工结果方面最有前景。#老年护理#员工流动率

相似文献

1
The effectiveness of peer-led interventions to improve work-related psychosocial outcomes and reduce turnover of support workers in residential aged care: A systematic review and meta-analysis.同伴主导的干预措施对改善老年护理机构中护工与工作相关的心理社会状况及减少人员流失的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2023 Oct 15;5:100158. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100158. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Interventions to support the resilience and mental health of frontline health and social care professionals during and after a disease outbreak, epidemic or pandemic: a mixed methods systematic review.在疾病爆发、流行或大流行期间及之后,为支持一线卫生和社会护理专业人员的适应能力和心理健康所采取的干预措施:一项混合方法的系统评价
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 5;11(11):CD013779. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013779.
5
The effectiveness of mindfulness based programs in reducing stress experienced by nurses in adult hospital settings: a systematic review of quantitative evidence protocol.基于正念的项目在减轻成人医院环境中护士所经历压力方面的有效性:定量证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):21-9. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2380.
6
Telephone interventions, delivered by healthcare professionals, for providing education and psychosocial support for informal caregivers of adults with diagnosed illnesses.由医疗保健专业人员进行的电话干预,旨在为患有确诊疾病的成年人的非正式护理人员提供教育和心理社会支持。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 14;5(5):CD012533. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012533.pub2.
7
Education and training for preventing and minimizing workplace aggression directed toward healthcare workers.针对预防和尽量减少针对医护人员的职场暴力行为的教育与培训。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 8;9(9):CD011860. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011860.pub2.
8
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
9
Mobile apps to reduce depressive symptoms and alcohol use in youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis: A systematic review.减少青少年抑郁症状和酒精使用的移动应用程序:一项系统评价和荟萃分析:一项系统评价。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 26;20(2):e1398. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1398. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
Does type of provider matter for staff well-being? a cross-sectional study of residential care home workers' job demands and resources.服务提供者的类型对员工福祉有影响吗?一项关于养老院工作人员工作需求和资源的横断面研究。
Work. 2025 Apr;80(4):1822-1837. doi: 10.1177/10519815241300294. Epub 2025 Jan 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Eldercare's Turnover Intention and Human Resource Approach: A Systematic Review.老年护理人员离职意愿与人力资源管理措施:系统综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 22;20(5):3932. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053932.
2
Actual and projected gaps in the provision of residential aged care in New South Wales, Australia.澳大利亚新南威尔士州提供养老院服务的实际差距和预测差距。
Aust Health Rev. 2022 Aug;46(4):398-404. doi: 10.1071/AH21142.
3
Care workers' perspectives of factors affecting a sustainable aged care workforce.照顾者对影响老年护理人员可持续性的因素的看法。
Int Nurs Rev. 2021 Mar;68(1):49-58. doi: 10.1111/inr.12635. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
4
Implementing Microlearning in Nursing Homes: Implications for Policy and Practice in Person-Centered Dementia Care.将微学习应用于养老院:对以患者为中心的痴呆症护理的政策和实践的启示。
J Appl Gerontol. 2021 Sep;40(9):1062-1070. doi: 10.1177/0733464820929832. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
5
The effect of function-focused care on long-term care workers in South Korea.功能聚焦型护理对韩国长期护理工作者的影响。
Geriatr Nurs. 2020 Sep-Oct;41(5):629-634. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2020.03.017. Epub 2020 May 4.
6
Surveying knowledge, practice and attitudes towards intervention fidelity within trials of complex healthcare interventions.在复杂医疗保健干预试验中调查对干预保真度的知识、实践和态度。
Trials. 2018 Sep 19;19(1):504. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2838-6.
7
A longitudinal, mixed methods investigation of newly qualified nurses' workplace stressors and stress experiences during transition.一项针对新入职护士在过渡期间工作压力源和压力体验的纵向混合方法研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2017 Nov;73(11):2577-2586. doi: 10.1111/jan.13344. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
8
Revisiting the Link between Job Satisfaction and Life Satisfaction: The Role of Basic Psychological Needs.重新审视工作满意度与生活满意度之间的联系:基本心理需求的作用。
Front Psychol. 2017 May 9;8:680. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00680. eCollection 2017.
9
Do interventions with staff in long-term residential facilities improve quality of care or quality for life people with dementia? A systematic review of the evidence.针对长期居住设施中工作人员的干预措施能否改善痴呆症患者的护理质量或生活质量?证据的系统综述。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 Dec;28(12):1937-1963. doi: 10.1017/S1041610216001083. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
10
Effects of the Staff Training for Assisted Living Residences protocol for caregivers of older adults with dementia: A pilot study in the Brazilian population.针对老年痴呆症患者护理员的辅助生活设施工作人员培训方案的效果:巴西人群的一项试点研究。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017 Mar;17(3):449-455. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12742. Epub 2016 Feb 5.