Suppr超能文献

针对长期居住设施中工作人员的干预措施能否改善痴呆症患者的护理质量或生活质量?证据的系统综述。

Do interventions with staff in long-term residential facilities improve quality of care or quality for life people with dementia? A systematic review of the evidence.

作者信息

Bird Mike, Anderson Katrina, MacPherson Sarah, Blair Annaliese

机构信息

Dementia Services Development Centre,Bangor University,Bangor,Gwynedd,UK.

NHMRC Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre,Sydney,New South Wales,Australia.

出版信息

Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 Dec;28(12):1937-1963. doi: 10.1017/S1041610216001083. Epub 2016 Jul 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Common sense suggests and research indicates relationships between staff factors in residential dementia care and quality of life (QOL) for residents, with poor care increasing suffering. However, we do not have a coherent picture of which staff interventions have an impact on quality of care (QOC) or resident QOL.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of 20 years' peer-reviewed literature using Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, PubMed, CINAHL, and the Cochrane, Campbell Collaboration identified 4,760 studies meriting full text review. Forty-six met the inclusion criteria, namely interventions in long-term facilities helping staff develop their capacity to provide better care and/or QOL for residents with dementia. Thirty-five other papers comprised an associated predictor review.

RESULTS

Conclusions from these limited data are further compromised because nine studies failed to measure effects on residents and only half assessed effects after the project team withdrew. Of these, excellent studies produced change over the medium (3-4 months) or longer term, including reduction in challenging behavior and restraint use but this applied only to a minority. A number of studies failed to measure effects on QOC, limiting conclusions about mechanisms underlying change.

CONCLUSION

In general, level of intervention required depended on the target. For outcomes like restraint use, structured education sessions with some support appear adequate. Programs to reduce pain require more support. For complicated issues like challenging behavior and increasing co-operation in showering, detailed, supportive, on-site interventions are required. Improvements in restraint and staff/resident interactions were the most promising findings. (Review registration number: PROSPERO 2014:CRD42014015224).

摘要

背景

常识表明且研究指出,老年痴呆症护理机构中的员工因素与居民的生活质量(QOL)之间存在关联,护理不善会加剧痛苦。然而,我们对于哪些员工干预措施会对护理质量(QOC)或居民生活质量产生影响,尚无一个连贯的认识。

方法

通过检索Medline、PsycINFO、Embase、PubMed、CINAHL以及Cochrane和坎贝尔协作组织的20年同行评审文献,共识别出4760项值得全文审查的研究。其中46项符合纳入标准,即针对长期护理机构的干预措施,旨在帮助员工提升为老年痴呆症患者提供更好护理和/或生活质量的能力。另外35篇论文构成了相关预测因素综述。

结果

这些有限数据得出的结论因以下情况而进一步受到影响:9项研究未测量对居民的影响,只有一半研究在项目团队撤出后评估了效果。其中,优秀的研究在中期(3 - 4个月)或更长时间内产生了变化,包括挑战性行为和约束措施使用的减少,但这仅适用于少数情况。许多研究未测量对护理质量的影响,限制了关于变化潜在机制的结论。

结论

总体而言,所需的干预水平取决于目标。对于约束措施使用等结果,在一定支持下的结构化教育课程似乎就足够了。减轻疼痛的项目需要更多支持。对于诸如挑战性行为和增加淋浴时的合作等复杂问题,则需要详细、支持性的现场干预措施。约束措施以及员工与居民互动方面的改善是最有前景的研究发现。(综述注册号:PROSPERO 2014:CRD42014015224)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验