• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于修复阴道分娩一度会阴撕裂的手术黏合剂:一项随机对照临床试验。

Surgical adhesive glue to repair first-degree perineal tears in vaginal birth: A randomised controlled clinical trial.

作者信息

Teixeira Thaís Trevisan, Riesco Maria Luiza

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of São Paulo. Midwife in clinical practice at Casa Angela Birth Center, Brazil.

School of Nursing, University of São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2023 May 12;5:100130. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100130. eCollection 2023 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100130
PMID:38746582
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11080570/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Perineal tears in vaginal birth are highly prevalent and may be related to physical and psychological trauma. Surgical glues are an alternative repair method to avoid the pain that may be caused by perineal repairs with sutures.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of surgical adhesive glue in reducing perineal pain when compared to sutures in first-degree perineal tears resulting from vaginal birth.

DESIGN

Open-label parallel-group randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

An alongside birth centre in Sao Paulo, Brazil.

PARTICIPANTS

84 intrapartum women with first-degree perineal tears needing repair.

METHODS

In the experimental group ( = 42), the perineal tears were repaired with Epiglu® surgical glue (ethyl-2-cyanoacrylate); in the control group ( = 42), the tears were repaired with Vicryl Rapide® (polyglactin 910) sutures. The primary outcome was the intensity of perineal pain after birth measured by a numeric pain rating scale ranging from 0 to 10 points. The secondary outcomes were healing, measured by the "Redness, Oedema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, and Approximation" scale; women's satisfaction with the perineal repair, measured by a visual analogue scale; and the time necessary to complete the repair. Data were collected during postpartum hospitalisation and 10-20 days after discharge, from December 2020 to May 2021. Data were analysed using bivariate analysis and linear models by intention-to-treat.

RESULTS

36-48 h after birth, the mean of perineal pain was 0.2 (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.1-0.8) in the experimental group and 0.9 (95% CI 0.5-1.5) in the control group; the perineal healing score was 0.7 (95% CI 0.4-1.2) and 0.8 (95% CI 0.5-1.2), in the experimental and control groups, respectively; satisfaction was higher among women in the experimental group (88.1% versus 83.3% in the control group). After discharge, the mean of perineal pain was 0.1 (95% CI 0.0-0.5) in the experimental group and 1.4 (95% CI 0.8-2.2) in the control group; the perineal healing score was 0.0 (95% CI 0) and 1.0 (95% CI 0.7-1.3) in the experimental and control groups, respectively. Satisfaction was higher in the experimental group (94.9% versus 75.0%). The longitudinal analysis showed statistically significant differences between the groups regarding perineal pain and women's satisfaction. The average time necessary for perineal repair was 6.0 (95% CI 4.7-8.7) minutes in the experimental group and 9.7 (95% CI 8.3-11.5) in the control group ( < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical glue resulted in less perineal pain, faster repair, and greater satisfaction than perineal sutures after birth. The healing process was similar in both cases.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Surgical glue was less painful and promoted greater satisfaction after birth compared to sutures in women with first-degree perineal tears.

REGISTRATION

Registered on The Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry number RBR-52y5tq (http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-52y5tq/), on July 16, 2020. The first recruitment was on December 17, 2020.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2628/11080570/e01595b34464/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2628/11080570/e01595b34464/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2628/11080570/e01595b34464/gr1.jpg
摘要

背景

阴道分娩时会阴撕裂非常普遍,可能与身体和心理创伤有关。手术胶水是一种替代修复方法,可避免会阴缝合修复可能引起的疼痛。

目的

评估与阴道分娩导致的一度会阴撕裂缝合术相比,手术粘合胶水在减轻会阴疼痛方面的有效性。

设计

开放标签平行组随机对照试验。

地点

巴西圣保罗的一家助产中心。

参与者

84名需要修复一度会阴撕裂的产时妇女。

方法

实验组(n = 42)使用Epiglu®手术胶水(乙基-2-氰基丙烯酸酯)修复会阴撕裂;对照组(n = 42)使用Vicryl Rapide®(聚乙醇酸910)缝线修复撕裂。主要结局是产后用0至10分数字疼痛评分量表测量的会阴疼痛强度。次要结局包括用“发红、水肿、瘀斑、分泌物和愈合程度”量表测量的愈合情况;用视觉模拟量表测量的妇女对会阴修复的满意度;以及完成修复所需的时间。数据收集于2020年12月至2021年5月产后住院期间及出院后10 - 20天。采用意向性分析的双变量分析和线性模型对数据进行分析。

结果

出生后36 - 48小时,实验组会阴疼痛平均值为0.2(95%置信区间[CI] 0.1 - 0.8),对照组为0.9(95% CI 0.5 - 1.5);实验组和对照组的会阴愈合评分分别为0.7(95% CI 0.4 - 1.2)和0.8(95% CI 0.5 - 1.2);实验组妇女的满意度更高(88.1%对对照组的83.3%)。出院后,实验组会阴疼痛平均值为0.1(95% CI 0.0 - 0.5),对照组为1.4(95% CI 0.8 - 2.2);实验组和对照组的会阴愈合评分分别为0.0(95% CI 0)和1.0(95% CI 0.7 - 1.3)。实验组满意度更高(94.9%对75.0%)。纵向分析显示,两组在会阴疼痛和妇女满意度方面存在统计学显著差异。实验组会阴修复平均所需时间为6.0(95% CI 4.7 - 8.7)分钟,对照组为9.7(95% CI 8.3 - 11.5)分钟(P < 0.001)。

结论

与产后会阴缝合相比,手术胶水导致的会阴疼痛更少、修复更快且满意度更高。两种情况下的愈合过程相似。

推文摘要

对于一度会阴撕裂的女性,与缝合相比,手术胶水产后疼痛更小且满意度更高。

注册情况

于2020年7月16日在巴西临床试验注册中心注册,注册号为RBR - 52y5tq(http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR - 52y5tq/)。首次招募时间为2020年12月17日。

相似文献

1
Surgical adhesive glue to repair first-degree perineal tears in vaginal birth: A randomised controlled clinical trial.用于修复阴道分娩一度会阴撕裂的手术黏合剂:一项随机对照临床试验。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2023 May 12;5:100130. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100130. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Use of surgical glue versus suture to repair perineal tears: a randomised controlled trial.使用外科胶水与缝线修复会阴撕裂:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Apr 12;23(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05565-x.
3
The use of non-surgical glue to repair perineal first-degree lacerations in normal birth: A non-inferiority randomised trial.非手术胶在正常分娩中修复会阴一度裂伤的应用:一项非劣效性随机试验。
Women Birth. 2021 Sep;34(5):e514-e519. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.09.018. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
4
Use of endoanal ultrasound for reducing the risk of complications related to anal sphincter injury after vaginal birth.使用经肛门超声降低阴道分娩后肛门括约肌损伤相关并发症的风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 29;2015(10):CD010826. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010826.pub2.
5
Pain, healing and satisfaction of women after perineal repair with surgical glue and suture.女性会阴修复术后使用手术胶和缝线的疼痛、愈合和满意度。
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2020 Sep 21;54:e03588. doi: 10.1590/S1980-220X2018044203588. eCollection 2020.
6
Randomized Trial of 3 Techniques of Perineal Skin Closure During Second-Degree Perineal Laceration Repair.随机试验比较三种会阴Ⅱ度裂伤缝合技术。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2019 Sep;64(5):567-577. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13020. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
7
Perineal skin tear repair following vaginal birth; skin adhesive versus conventional suture - a randomised controlled trial.会阴皮肤裂伤修复:阴道分娩后,皮肤粘合剂与传统缝合的比较——一项随机对照试验。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Feb;41(2):242-247. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2020.1740917. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
8
Perineal repair of media-lateral episiotomies and 2nd degree tears by midwives: A randomised controlled trial comparing three suture techniques.助产士行会阴中部侧切和Ⅱ度撕裂修复术:三种缝合技术比较的随机对照试验
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Jun;106:103553. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103553. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
9
Clinical equivalence of Trusynth fast and Vicryl rapide polyglactin 910 fast absorbing sutures on maternal morbidity experienced by women following episiotomy repair: a single-blind, randomized study.经会阴切开修补术后产妇发病率方面,Trusynth fast 与 Vicryl rapide 聚乳酸 910 快吸收缝线的临床等效性:一项单盲、随机研究。
F1000Res. 2023 Jun 23;11:1179. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.126555.2. eCollection 2022.
10
Effect of tissue adhesives in repairing perineal trauma during childbirth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.组织粘合剂在修复分娩时会阴创伤中的作用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 May;32(9-10):1569-1586. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16086. Epub 2021 Oct 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk factors for perineal and vaginal tears in primiparous women - the prospective POPRACT-cohort study.初产妇会阴和阴道撕裂的危险因素 - 前瞻性 POPRACT 队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Dec 2;20(1):749. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03447-0.
2
The use of non-surgical glue to repair perineal first-degree lacerations in normal birth: A non-inferiority randomised trial.非手术胶在正常分娩中修复会阴一度裂伤的应用:一项非劣效性随机试验。
Women Birth. 2021 Sep;34(5):e514-e519. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.09.018. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
3
Perineal skin tear repair following vaginal birth; skin adhesive versus conventional suture - a randomised controlled trial.
会阴皮肤裂伤修复:阴道分娩后,皮肤粘合剂与传统缝合的比较——一项随机对照试验。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Feb;41(2):242-247. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2020.1740917. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
4
Randomized Trial of 3 Techniques of Perineal Skin Closure During Second-Degree Perineal Laceration Repair.随机试验比较三种会阴Ⅱ度裂伤缝合技术。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2019 Sep;64(5):567-577. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13020. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
5
Oral Applications of Cyanoacrylate Adhesives: A Literature Review.氰基丙烯酸酯粘合剂的口腔应用:文献综述。
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Mar 17;2019:8217602. doi: 10.1155/2019/8217602. eCollection 2019.
6
Perineal trauma: incidence and its risk factors.会阴创伤:发生率及其危险因素。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Feb;39(2):206-211. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1476473. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
7
Factors associated with spontaneous perineal lacerations in deliveries without episiotomy in a university maternity hospital in the city of Recife, Brazil: a cohort study.巴西累西腓市一家大学妇产医院中未行会阴切开术分娩时自发性会阴裂伤的相关因素:一项队列研究
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Sep;32(18):3062-3067. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1457639. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
8
Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth.经阴道分娩时会阴切开术的选择性使用与常规使用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 8;2(2):CD000081. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub3.
9
Overview of Wound Healing and Management.伤口愈合与处理概述
Surg Clin North Am. 2017 Feb;97(1):189-207. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2016.08.013.
10
Practice Bulletin No. 165: Prevention and Management of Obstetric Lacerations at Vaginal Delivery.第165号实践公告:阴道分娩时产科裂伤的预防与处理
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jul;128(1):e1-e15. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001523.