Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Hamburg, Germany.
African Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2024 May;39(5):e6099. doi: 10.1002/gps.6099.
To examine the factors associated with institutionalization among individuals aged 80 years and over in Germany (total sample and stratified by sex).
METHODS/DESIGN: We used data from the nationally representative 'Old Age in Germany (D80+)' (analytic sample: n = 9572 individuals), including individuals aged 80 years and over in Germany. Institutionalization (private living vs. institutionalization) served as an outcome measure. For the written interview, data collection took place from November 2020 to April 2021. Multiple logistic regressions of the overall sample (also stratified by sex) were applied.
In the analytic sample, 10.2% (95% CI: 9.2%-11.3%) of the participants were institutionalized. The odds of being institutionalized were positively associated with being female (OR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.08 to 3.80), being 90 years and over (compared to 80-84 years, OR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.17 to 2.40), not being married (e.g., being single compared to being married: OR: 14.06, 95% CI: 6.73 to 29.37), higher education (e.g., high education compared to low education: OR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.25 to 2.84), more favorable self-rated health (OR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.62) and greater functional impairment (OR: 15.34, 95% CI: 11.91 to 19.74). Sex-stratified regressions were also conducted, mostly yielding similar results.
Our study highlighted the role of several sociodemographic factors (particularly marital status, e.g., being single) and functional impairment for the risk of institutionalization among the oldest old in Germany. This study confirms findings in studies in younger samples that functional decline is the main factor associated with institutionalization. As functional decline may be modifiable, efforts to maintain functional abilities may be important. This knowledge is important for relevant groups (such as clinicians and policy-makers) because it may guide early intervention and prevention efforts, can help allocate healthcare resources effectively and shape policies to support independent living. Further insights using longitudinal data is recommended.
研究德国 80 岁及以上人群(总样本及按性别分层)与机构化相关的因素。
方法/设计:我们使用了全国代表性的“德国老年(D80+)”(分析样本:n=9572 人)的数据,包括德国 80 岁及以上的人群。机构化(私人生活与机构化)作为结果衡量标准。书面访谈于 2020 年 11 月至 2021 年 4 月进行。对总样本(也按性别分层)进行了多项逻辑回归。
在分析样本中,10.2%(95%CI:9.2%-11.3%)的参与者被机构化。与女性(OR:2.02,95%CI:1.08-3.80)、90 岁及以上(与 80-84 岁相比,OR:1.67,95%CI:1.17-2.40)、未婚(例如,单身与已婚相比,OR:14.06,95%CI:6.73-29.37)、接受高等教育(例如,高等教育与低等教育相比,OR:1.88,95%CI:1.25-2.84)、自我报告的健康状况较好(OR:1.32,95%CI:1.07-1.62)和功能障碍程度较高(OR:15.34,95%CI:11.91-19.74)与机构化的风险呈正相关。还进行了性别分层回归,结果大多相似。
本研究强调了几个社会人口因素(特别是婚姻状况,例如单身)和功能障碍对德国最年长人群机构化风险的作用。这项研究证实了在较年轻样本中进行的研究结果,即功能下降是与机构化相关的主要因素。由于功能下降可能是可改变的,因此努力维持功能能力可能很重要。这些知识对于相关群体(如临床医生和决策者)很重要,因为它可以指导早期干预和预防措施,帮助有效分配医疗保健资源,并制定支持独立生活的政策。建议使用纵向数据进一步深入了解。