• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字健康实践中医患关系研究的理论基础:范围综述

Theoretical Perspectives Underpinning Research on the Physician-Patient Relationship in a Digital Health Practice: Scoping Review.

作者信息

Nassehi Damoun, Gripsrud Birgitta Haga, Ramvi Ellen

机构信息

Department of Caring and Ethics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.

出版信息

Interact J Med Res. 2024 May 15;13:e47280. doi: 10.2196/47280.

DOI:10.2196/47280
PMID:38748465
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11137420/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The advent of digital health technologies has transformed the landscape of health care, influencing the dynamics of the physician-patient relationship. Although these technologies offer potential benefits, they also introduce challenges and complexities that require ethical consideration.

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review aims to investigate the effects of digital health technologies, such as digital messaging, telemedicine, and electronic health records, on the physician-patient relationship. To understand the complex consequences of these tools within health care, it contrasts the findings of studies that use various theoretical frameworks and concepts with studies grounded in relational ethics.

METHODS

Using the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines, we conducted a scoping review. Data were retrieved through keyword searches on MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, IEEE Xplore, and Cochrane. We screened 427 original peer-reviewed research papers published in English-language journals between 2010 and 2021. A total of 73 papers were assessed for eligibility, and 10 of these were included in the review. The data were summarized through a narrative synthesis of the findings.

RESULTS

Digital health technologies enhance communication, improve health care delivery efficiency, and empower patients, leading to shifts in power dynamics in the physician-patient relationship. They also potentially reinforce inequities in health care access due to variations in technology literacy among patients and lead to decreases in patient satisfaction due to the impersonal nature of digital interactions. Studies applying a relational ethics framework have revealed the nuanced impacts of digital health technologies on the physician-patient relationship, highlighting shifts toward more collaborative and reciprocal care. These studies have also explored transitions from traditional hierarchical relationships to mutual engagement, capturing the complexities of power dynamics and vulnerabilities. Other theoretical frameworks, such as patient-centered care, and concepts, such as patient empowerment, were also valuable for understanding these interactions in the context of digital health.

CONCLUSIONS

The shift from hierarchical to collaborative models in the physician-patient relationship not only underscores the empowering potential of digital tools but also presents new challenges and reinforces existing ones. Along with applications for various theoretical frameworks and concepts, this review highlights the unique comprehensiveness of a relational ethics perspective, which could provide a more nuanced understanding of trust, empathy, and power dynamics in the context of digital health. The adoption of relational ethics in empirical research may offer richer insights into the real-life complexities of the physician-patient relationship, as mediated by digital technologies.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7460/11137420/6ca0b94fae15/ijmr_v13i1e47280_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7460/11137420/6ca0b94fae15/ijmr_v13i1e47280_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7460/11137420/6ca0b94fae15/ijmr_v13i1e47280_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

数字健康技术的出现改变了医疗保健的格局,影响着医患关系的动态变化。尽管这些技术带来了潜在的益处,但它们也带来了需要伦理考量的挑战和复杂性。

目的

本范围综述旨在研究数字信息、远程医疗和电子健康记录等数字健康技术对医患关系的影响。为了理解这些工具在医疗保健中的复杂后果,它将使用各种理论框架和概念的研究结果与基于关系伦理的研究结果进行对比。

方法

我们使用PRISMA-ScR(系统评价和Meta分析扩展版的范围综述首选报告项目)指南进行了范围综述。通过在MEDLINE/PubMed、Embase、IEEE Xplore和Cochrane上进行关键词搜索来检索数据。我们筛选了2010年至2021年期间发表在英文期刊上的427篇经同行评审的原创研究论文。总共评估了73篇论文的 eligibility,其中10篇被纳入综述。通过对研究结果的叙述性综合来总结数据。

结果

数字健康技术增强了沟通,提高了医疗保健服务效率,并赋予患者权力,导致医患关系中的权力动态发生变化。由于患者技术素养的差异,它们还可能加剧医疗保健获取方面的不平等,并由于数字互动的非个性化性质导致患者满意度下降。应用关系伦理框架的研究揭示了数字健康技术对医患关系的细微影响,突出了向更具协作性和互惠性的护理的转变。这些研究还探讨了从传统等级关系向相互参与的转变,捕捉了权力动态和脆弱性的复杂性。其他理论框架,如以患者为中心的护理,以及概念,如患者赋权,对于在数字健康背景下理解这些互动也很有价值。

结论

医患关系从等级模式向协作模式的转变不仅凸显了数字工具的赋权潜力,也带来了新的挑战并强化了现有挑战。除了各种理论框架和概念的应用外,本综述还强调了关系伦理视角的独特全面性,它可以在数字健康背景下对信任、同理心和权力动态提供更细微的理解。在实证研究中采用关系伦理可能会为数字技术介导的医患关系的现实生活复杂性提供更丰富的见解。

相似文献

1
Theoretical Perspectives Underpinning Research on the Physician-Patient Relationship in a Digital Health Practice: Scoping Review.数字健康实践中医患关系研究的理论基础:范围综述
Interact J Med Res. 2024 May 15;13:e47280. doi: 10.2196/47280.
2
Mapping Digital Public Health Interventions Among Existing Digital Technologies and Internet-Based Interventions to Maintain and Improve Population Health in Practice: Protocol for a Scoping Review.在现有数字技术和基于互联网的干预措施中映射数字公共卫生干预措施以在实践中维持和改善人群健康:一项范围综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Mar 31;11(3):e33404. doi: 10.2196/33404.
3
Integrating digital and narrative medicine in modern healthcare: a systematic review.现代医疗保健中数字医学与叙事医学的整合:一项系统综述
Med Educ Online. 2025 Dec;30(1):2475979. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2025.2475979. Epub 2025 May 6.
4
The Role of Large Language Models in Transforming Emergency Medicine: Scoping Review.大型语言模型在变革急诊医学中的作用:范围综述
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 May 10;12:e53787. doi: 10.2196/53787.
5
Barriers to and facilitators of clinician acceptance and use of artificial intelligence in healthcare settings: a scoping review.医疗环境中临床医生接受和使用人工智能的障碍与促进因素:一项范围综述
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 15;15(4):e092624. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092624.
6
Digital Rights and Mobile Health in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Protocol for a Scoping Review.低收入和中等收入国家的数字权利与移动健康:一项范围审查的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Oct 3;12:e49150. doi: 10.2196/49150.
7
Longitudinal Coadaptation of Older Adults With Wearables and Voice-Activated Virtual Assistants: Scoping Review.老年人穿戴设备和语音激活虚拟助手的纵向协同适应:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 7;26:e57258. doi: 10.2196/57258.
8
eHealth Technologies for Monitoring Pediatric Asthma at Home: Scoping Review.家庭监测小儿哮喘的电子健康技术:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 21;25:e45896. doi: 10.2196/45896.
9
Digital Age Transformation in Patient-Physician Communication: 25-Year Narrative Review (1999-2023).医患沟通中的数字时代转型:25年叙事性综述(1999 - 2023)
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 16;27:e60512. doi: 10.2196/60512.
10
eHealth Tools Supporting Early Childhood Education and Care Centers to Assess and Enhance Nutrition and Physical Activity Environments: Protocol for a Scoping Review.支持幼儿教育与照料中心评估和改善营养与身体活动环境的电子健康工具:一项范围综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Oct 24;12:e52252. doi: 10.2196/52252.

引用本文的文献

1
Digitally mapping the asthma journey-from diagnosis to remission.数字化描绘哮喘历程——从诊断到缓解
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 May 5;83:103204. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103204. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Impact of Digital Health on Patient-Provider Relationships in Respiratory Secondary Care Based on Qualitative and Quantitative Evidence: Systematic Review.基于定性和定量证据的数字健康对呼吸二级护理中患者与医护人员关系的影响:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 30;27:e70970. doi: 10.2196/70970.
3
Care in the era of digital health: experiences from Norwegian general practitioners.

本文引用的文献

1
Continuity in general practice as predictor of mortality, acute hospitalisation, and use of out-of-hours care: a registry-based observational study in Norway.一般实践中的连续性作为死亡率、急性住院和非工作时间护理使用的预测因素:挪威基于登记的观察性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Jan 27;72(715):e84-e90. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0340. Print 2022 Feb.
2
The impact of medical teleconsultations on general practitioner-patient communication during COVID- 19: A case study from Poland.医疗远程问诊对 COVID-19 期间全科医生-患者沟通的影响:来自波兰的案例研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 16;16(7):e0254960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254960. eCollection 2021.
3
数字健康时代的医疗护理:挪威全科医生的经验
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2025 Jun;43(2):338-346. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2024.2437417. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
Physicians' experiences of video consultation with patients at a public virtual primary care clinic: a qualitative interview study.
医生在公立虚拟初级保健诊所与患者进行视频咨询的体验:一项定性访谈研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2021 Mar;39(1):67-76. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2021.1882082. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
4
A digital (r)evolution: introducing The Lancet Digital Health.一场数字(r)革命:推出《柳叶刀·数字健康》。
Lancet Digit Health. 2019 May;1(1):e1. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30010-X. Epub 2019 May 2.
5
Digitally engaged physicians about the digital health transition.关注数字健康转型的数字化执业医师。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 28;15(9):e0238658. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238658. eCollection 2020.
6
The Antecedents of Poor Doctor-Patient Relationship in Mobile Consultation: A Perspective from Computer-Mediated Communication.移动咨询中不良医患关系的前因:计算机中介传播视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 9;17(7):2579. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072579.
7
SERIES: eHealth in primary care. Part 2: Exploring the ethical implications of its application in primary care practice.系列文章:初级保健中的电子健康。第 2 部分:探讨其在初级保健实践中的应用所涉及的伦理问题。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2020 Dec;26(1):26-32. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2019.1678958. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
8
Relationship based care - how general practice developed and why it is undermined within contemporary healthcare systems.基于关系的医疗保健——全科医学的发展及其在当代医疗保健系统中被削弱的原因。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019 Sep;37(3):335-344. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2019.1639909. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
9
Telemedicine Video Visits for patients receiving palliative care: A qualitative study.接受姑息治疗患者的远程医疗视频问诊:一项定性研究。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019 Sep;36(9):789-794. doi: 10.1177/1049909119846843. Epub 2019 May 7.
10
The Relationship between Face-to-Face and Online Patient-Provider Communication: Examining the Moderating Roles of Patient Trust and Patient Satisfaction.医患面对面沟通与在线沟通的关系:检验患者信任和患者满意度的调节作用。
Health Commun. 2020 Mar;35(3):341-349. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2018.1563030. Epub 2019 Mar 1.