• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较 COVID-19 阳性和阴性缺血性脑卒中患者接受血管再通治疗的影像学和临床特征:一项单中心土耳其研究。

Comparison of radiological and clinical characteristics of COVID-19 positive and negative ischemic stroke patients undergoing revascularization: A single-centre Turkish study.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Health Sciences, Bursa Faculty of Medicine, Bursa City Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.

Department of Neurology, University of Health Sciences, Bursa Faculty of Medicine, Bursa City Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.

出版信息

Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024 Jul;242:108324. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108324. Epub 2024 May 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108324
PMID:38749359
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare the radiological and clinical characteristics of COVID-19-positive and -negative acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients who underwent revascularization and to evaluate whether COVID-19 has an effect on revascularization and outcome in AIS patients with COVID-19 infection.

METHODS

Consecutive COVID-19 positive and negative AIS patients who underwent intravenous thrombolysis and/or endovascular therapy in our hospital between March 2020 and February 2022 were included in this study. Our study is retrospective and 23 COVID-19 positive patients and 108 COVID-19 negative patients were compared in terms of radiological and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

Hypertension was lower in the COVID-19 positive ischemic stroke group (p=0.029). Admission NIHSS score was higher in COVID-19 positive patients (p=0.041). ASPECTS was found to be lower in COVID-19 positive ischemic stroke patients (p=0.019). The rate of hyperdense artery sign differed between groups (p=0.014) and was higher in the COVID-19 positive ischemic stroke group. The incidence of multi-vessel occlusion was found to be significantly higher in the COVID-19-positive ischemic stroke group (p=0.002). In terms of prognostic features, only the 3-month good outcome rate was statistically significantly lower in the COVID-19-positive ischemic stroke group (p=0.011).

CONCLUSION

This study found that radiologically, COVID-19 may be associated with lower ASPECTS in ischemic stroke patients receiving revascularization treatment and may predispose to multivessel occlusion and hyperdense artery sign. Clinically, COVID-19 may be associated with a more severe initial presentation and worse prognosis at 3 months in ischemic stroke patients undergoing revascularization, but may not affect long-term mortality.

摘要

目的

比较 COVID-19 阳性和阴性急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者接受血管再通治疗的影像学和临床特征,并评估 COVID-19 对 COVID-19 感染 AIS 患者血管再通和结局的影响。

方法

本研究纳入 2020 年 3 月至 2022 年 2 月期间在我院接受静脉溶栓和/或血管内治疗的连续 COVID-19 阳性和阴性 AIS 患者。本研究为回顾性研究,比较了 23 例 COVID-19 阳性患者和 108 例 COVID-19 阴性患者的影像学和临床特征。

结果

COVID-19 阳性缺血性卒中组高血压发生率较低(p=0.029)。COVID-19 阳性患者入院 NIHSS 评分较高(p=0.041)。COVID-19 阳性缺血性卒中患者 ASPECTS 评分较低(p=0.019)。COVID-19 阳性缺血性卒中组高密度动脉征的发生率存在差异(p=0.014),且阳性率较高。COVID-19 阳性缺血性卒中组多血管闭塞的发生率明显较高(p=0.002)。在预后特征方面,COVID-19 阳性缺血性卒中组 3 个月时良好结局率明显较低(p=0.011)。

结论

本研究发现,COVID-19 可能与接受血管再通治疗的缺血性卒中患者的 ASPECTS 较低有关,并且可能易导致多血管闭塞和高密度动脉征。临床方面,COVID-19 可能与血管再通的缺血性卒中患者初始表现更严重,3 个月预后更差有关,但可能不影响长期死亡率。

相似文献

1
Comparison of radiological and clinical characteristics of COVID-19 positive and negative ischemic stroke patients undergoing revascularization: A single-centre Turkish study.比较 COVID-19 阳性和阴性缺血性脑卒中患者接受血管再通治疗的影像学和临床特征:一项单中心土耳其研究。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024 Jul;242:108324. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108324. Epub 2024 May 9.
2
Effect of Asymptomatic and Symptomatic COVID-19 on Acute Ischemic Stroke Revascularization Outcomes.无症状和有症状 COVID-19 对急性缺血性脑卒中血管再通治疗结局的影响。
Stroke. 2024 Jan;55(1):78-88. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.043899. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
3
Delayed Neurological Improvement After Full Endovascular Reperfusion in Acute Anterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke.急性前循环缺血性卒中全血管内再灌注后延迟性神经功能改善
Stroke. 2021 Jul;52(7):2210-2217. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032066. Epub 2021 May 20.
4
Efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke due to cervical artery dissection: A 15-year consecutive case series.急性缺血性脑卒中源于颈动脉夹层的血管内治疗的疗效和安全性:一项 15 年连续病例系列研究。
Int J Stroke. 2019 Jun;14(4):381-389. doi: 10.1177/1747493018823161. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
5
Safety and Outcome of Revascularization Treatment in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke and COVID-19: The Global COVID-19 Stroke Registry.COVID-19 急性缺血性脑卒中患者的血管再通治疗的安全性和结局:全球 COVID-19 卒中登记研究。
Neurology. 2023 Feb 14;100(7):e739-e750. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201537. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
6
Endovascular thrombectomy or bridging therapy in minor ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion.血管内血栓切除术或桥接治疗小面积缺血性卒中伴大血管闭塞。
Thromb Res. 2022 Nov;219:150-154. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2022.09.020. Epub 2022 Sep 25.
7
Relevance of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale subitems for best revascularization therapy in minor stroke patients with large vessel occlusion: An observational multicentric study.国立卫生研究院卒中量表亚项与大血管闭塞性小卒中患者最佳血管再通治疗的相关性:一项观察性多中心研究。
Eur J Neurol. 2023 Dec;30(12):3741-3750. doi: 10.1111/ene.16009. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
8
Microcatheter to recanalization (procedure time) predicts outcomes in endovascular treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke: when do we stop?微导管再通(操作时间)预测急性缺血性脑卒中患者血管内治疗的结局:我们何时停止?
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Feb;34(2):354-9. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3202. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
9
Acute Ischemic Stroke During the Convalescent Phase of Asymptomatic COVID-2019 Infection in Men.男性无症状 COVID-2019 感染恢复期的急性缺血性脑卒中。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e217498. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7498.
10
Mechanical thrombectomy in COVID-19-associated ischaemic stroke: patient characteristics and outcomes in a single-centre study.2019冠状病毒病相关缺血性卒中的机械取栓术:一项单中心研究中的患者特征与结局
Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2022;56(2):163-170. doi: 10.5603/PJNNS.a2022.0026. Epub 2022 Mar 22.