Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Dig Dis. 2024;42(5):399-406. doi: 10.1159/000539308. Epub 2024 May 15.
Superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) include low-grade adenoma (LGA) and high-grade adenoma or carcinoma (HGA/Ca) and are classified into two different epithelial subtypes, gastric-type (G-type) and intestinal-type (I-type). We attempted to distinguish them by endoscopic characteristics including magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (M-NBI).
Various endoscopic and M-NBI findings of 286 SNADETs were retrospectively reviewed and compared between G- and I-types and histological grades. M-NBI findings were divided into four patterns based on the following vascular patterns; absent, network, intrastructural vascular (ISV), and unclassified. Lesions displaying a single pattern were classified as mono-pattern and those displaying multiple patterns as mixed-pattern. Lesions showing CDX2 positivity were categorized as I-types and those showing MUC5AC or MUC6 positivity were categorized as G-types based on immunohistochemistry.
Among 286 lesions, 23 (8%) were G-type and 243 (85%) were I-type. More G-type lesions were located oral to papilla (91.3 vs. 45.6%, p < 0.001), and had protruding morphology compared to those of I-types (65.2 vs. 14.4%, p < 0.001). The major M-NBI pattern was ISV in G-type (78.2 vs. 26.3%, p < 0.001), and absent for I-type (0 vs. 34.5%, p = 0.003). Three endoscopic characteristics; location oral to papilla, protruding morphology, and major M-NBI pattern (ISV) were independent predictors for G-type. Mixed-pattern was more common in HGA/Ca than LGA for I-type (77.0 vs. 58.8%, p = 0.01); however, there was no difference for those in G-type.
Endoscopic findings including M-NBI are useful to differentiate epithelial subtypes.
非壶腹浅表性十二指肠上皮肿瘤(SNADETs)包括低级别腺瘤(LGA)和高级别腺瘤或癌(HGA/Ca),并分为两种不同的上皮亚型,胃型(G 型)和肠型(I 型)。我们试图通过包括窄带成像放大内镜(M-NBI)在内的内镜特征来区分它们。
回顾性分析了 286 例 SNADETs 的各种内镜和 M-NBI 表现,并比较了 G 型和 I 型以及组织学分级之间的差异。根据以下血管模式,将 M-NBI 表现分为四种类型:缺失、网络、结构内血管(ISV)和未分类。表现为单一模式的病变被归类为单模式,表现为多种模式的病变被归类为混合模式。根据免疫组织化学,CDX2 阳性的病变归类为 I 型,MUC5AC 或 MUC6 阳性的病变归类为 G 型。
在 286 个病变中,23 个(8%)为 G 型,243 个(85%)为 I 型。与 I 型相比,更多的 G 型病变位于乳头口(91.3%比 45.6%,p < 0.001),且具有外突形态(65.2%比 14.4%,p < 0.001)。G 型的主要 M-NBI 模式为 ISV(78.2%比 26.3%,p < 0.001),而 I 型则为缺失(0%比 34.5%,p = 0.003)。位于乳头口、外突形态和主要 M-NBI 模式(ISV)这三个内镜特征是 G 型的独立预测因素。对于 I 型,与 LGA 相比,HGA/Ca 中混合模式更为常见(77.0%比 58.8%,p = 0.01);然而,对于 G 型,两者之间没有差异。
包括 M-NBI 在内的内镜表现有助于区分上皮亚型。