Associate Professor, Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Associate Professor, Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Aug;132(2):473.e1-473.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.04.023. Epub 2024 May 14.
Evidence is lacking on the influence of different designs of bulb support structures on the accuracy of 3-dimensional (3D) printed obturators.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of various infill designs (hollow, honeycomb, and gyroid) for the bulb of an obturator on the accuracy and weight of digital light projection (DLP) 3D printed maxillary obturators.
A maxillary obturator was virtually designed and used to obtain 3 digital reference files which were defined based on the design of the infill support structure within the bulb: hollow, honeycomb, and gyroid. The resultant standard tessellation language (STL) files were used to fabricate the obturators using a DLP 3D-printer in FREEPRINT denture resin material (n=10 per each group design). The fitting surfaces of all printed specimens (n=30) were digitized using a laboratory scanner, and the scan STL files were exported to the Geomagic control X program for dimensional accuracy analysis (trueness and precision) using the digital subtraction technique. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for analysis (α=.05) RESULTS: Quantitative analysis revealed no significant difference in root mean square estimate (RMSE) values among the test groups for trueness (P=.326) and precision (P=.140). Hollow bulb design was significantly lighter in weight than both honeycomb and gyroid infill designs (P<.001). Colormaps revealed increased areas of negative deviation around the circumference of the bulb wall in the hollow design compared with both the gyroid and honeycomb groups and the close surface matching of fitting surfaces in the 3 groups.
The lack of significant difference in accuracy among the tested groups and the significantly lighter hollow design obturator compared with honeycomb and gyroid designs favors the selection of the hollow bulb design in the digital fabrication of maxillary obturators.
缺乏关于不同球托支撑结构设计对 3 维(3D)打印义齿修复体准确性影响的证据。
本体外研究旨在评估不同填充设计(空心、蜂窝和胞状)对义齿球托的影响,以评估对数字化光投影(DLP)3D 打印上颌义齿修复体的准确性和重量的影响。
虚拟设计上颌义齿,并获得 3 个数字参考文件,这些文件基于球托内填充支撑结构的设计定义:空心、蜂窝和胞状。所得的标准曲面细分语言(STL)文件用于使用 DLP 3D 打印机在 FREEPRINT 义齿树脂材料中制造义齿(每组设计各 10 个)。使用实验室扫描仪对所有打印样本的拟合表面(n=30)进行数字化,并将扫描 STL 文件导出到 Geomagic control X 程序,使用数字减法技术进行尺寸精度分析(准确性和精度)。使用单向方差分析(ANOVA)进行分析(α=.05)。
定量分析显示,在准确性方面,各组的均方根估计(RMSE)值没有显著差异,无论是准确性(P=.326)还是精度(P=.140)。空心球托设计的重量明显轻于蜂窝和胞状填充设计(P<.001)。色图显示,与蜂窝和胞状组相比,空心设计的球托壁周围的负偏差区域增加,并且 3 组的拟合表面的表面匹配良好。
在测试组之间,准确性没有显著差异,并且与蜂窝和胞状设计相比,空心设计的义齿修复体明显更轻,这有利于在数字化制造上颌义齿修复体时选择空心球托设计。