Kankane Arvind Kumar, Pandey Atul Kumar, Ramesh Patil Manish, Agarwal Arpit
Department of Neurology, MLB Medical College Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2024 Mar-Apr;27(2):158-164. doi: 10.4103/aian.aian_1041_23. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a chronic disease characterized by widespread, persistent musculoskeletal pain in association with impaired health-related quality of life. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an emerging tool for the management of fibromyalgia. There is no standardized protocol of rTMS for the treatment of FMS, and both low- and high-frequency stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) are described in the literature with variable efficacy. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of rTMS in people with fibromyalgia and compare the response of low- and high-frequency stimulation with sham stimulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a single-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Ninety patients with the diagnosis of FMS were randomly allocated into one of the following three groups: low-frequency (1 Hz) group, high-frequency (10 Hz) group, and sham group. Pain, depression, anxiety, and quality of life were measured using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), and Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) immediately following treatment as well as at 1 and 3 months after treatment. The data was statistically analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 23 software. value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Intergroup analysis revealed a significant improvement in NPRS, HAM-A, HDRS, and FIQR scores in both low- and high- frequency groups immediately following treatment and for 3 months after treatment. No significant difference in the efficacy of low- and high-frequency stimulation was noticed. CONCLUSIONS: rTMS is an effective mode of treatment in people with FMS. Both low and high frequencies of stimulation at DLPFC are equally effective in reducing pain and associated symptoms.
背景与目的:纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)是一种慢性疾病,其特征为广泛、持续的肌肉骨骼疼痛,并伴有健康相关生活质量受损。重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)是一种用于纤维肌痛管理的新兴工具。目前尚无用于治疗FMS的标准化rTMS方案,文献中描述了对背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC)进行低频和高频刺激,但其疗效各异。本研究的目的是确定rTMS对纤维肌痛患者的有效性,并比较低频和高频刺激与假刺激的反应。 材料与方法:本研究为单盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。90例诊断为FMS的患者被随机分为以下三组之一:低频(1Hz)组、高频(10Hz)组和假刺激组。在治疗后即刻以及治疗后1个月和3个月,使用数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)、汉密尔顿焦虑评定量表(HAM - A)、汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HDRS)和修订的纤维肌痛影响问卷(FIQR)测量疼痛、抑郁、焦虑和生活质量。使用社会科学统计软件包第23版软件对数据进行统计分析。P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。 结果:组间分析显示,低频和高频组在治疗后即刻以及治疗后3个月时,NPRS、HAM - A、HDRS和FIQR评分均有显著改善。未观察到低频和高频刺激疗效的显著差异。 结论:rTMS是治疗FMS患者的有效方式。DLPFC的低频和高频刺激在减轻疼痛及相关症状方面同样有效。
ACS Chem Neurosci. 2021-1-20
Front Neurosci. 2020-8-4
J Clin Med. 2020-4-23