Department of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110 029, India.
Department of Home Science, University of Delhi, New Delhi, 110 021, India.
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2024 Jun;43(3):668-678. doi: 10.1007/s12664-024-01519-z. Epub 2024 May 16.
Nutritional quality of gluten-free (GF) food products is very important, as patients with celiac disease consume these products for lifelong. There is paucity of data on the nutritional content and cost of GF food products compared with their gluten-containing (GC) counterparts from India (Asia).
After a detailed market survey, packaged and labeled GF food products (n=485) and their packaged GC counterparts (n=790) from the supermarkets of Delhi (India) and e-commerce websites were included. Nutritional content and cost/100 g food (in US dollars) were calculated using the information on food label.
Gluten-free food products were 232% (range: 118% to 376%) more expensive than their GC counterparts. Energy content of all GF food products was similar to their GC counterparts, except cereal-based snacks (GF: 445 kcal vs. GC: 510 kcal, p<0.001). The protein content was significantly lower in GF pasta and macaroni products (single-grain: GF: 6.5 g vs. GC:11. 5 g, p-0.002; multigrain: GF:7.6 g vs. GC:11.5 g, p-0.027), cereal flours (single-grain: GF: 7.6 g vs. GC: 12.3 g, p<0.001; multigrain: GF:10.9 g vs. GC: 14.1 g, p-0.009) and nutritional bars (GF: 21.81 g vs. GC:26 g, p-0.028) than their GC counterparts. Similarly, the dietary-fiber content of GF pasta and macaroni products, cereal flours, cereal premix and nutritional bars of GF foods was significantly lower than their GC counterparts. Gluten-free bread and confectionary items, biscuits and cookies and snacks had higher total fats and trans-fat content than their GC counterparts. Gluten-free cereal-based snacks had higher sodium content than their GC counterparts (GF: 820 mg vs. GC:670 mg; p<0.001).
GF foods are significantly more expensive, contain less protein and dietary fiber and higher fat, trans-fat and sodium than their GC counterparts. Strategies must be developed to reduce the cost and improve the nutritional profile of GF foods.
无麸质(GF)食品的营养质量非常重要,因为乳糜泻患者需要终生食用这些食品。与印度(亚洲)的含麸质(GC)食品相比,GF 食品的营养成分和成本数据非常匮乏。
经过详细的市场调查,我们纳入了来自印度德里超市和电子商务网站的包装和标签 GF 食品(n=485)及其包装 GC 食品(n=790)。使用食品标签上的信息计算营养成分和每 100 克食物的成本(以美元计)。
GF 食品比其 GC 食品贵 232%(范围:118%至 376%)。除谷物小吃(GF:445 千卡与 GC:510 千卡,p<0.001)外,所有 GF 食品的能量含量均与 GC 食品相似。GF 面食和通心粉产品的蛋白质含量明显低于 GC 面食和通心粉产品(单谷物:GF:6.5 克与 GC:11.5 克,p<0.002;多谷物:GF:7.6 克与 GC:11.5 克,p-0.027)、谷物面粉(单谷物:GF:7.6 克与 GC:12.3 克,p<0.001;多谷物:GF:10.9 克与 GC:14.1 克,p<0.009)和营养棒(GF:21.81 克与 GC:26 克,p-0.028)。同样,GF 面食和通心粉产品、谷物面粉、谷物预混料和营养棒的膳食纤维含量也明显低于 GC 食品。GF 面包和糕点、饼干和曲奇以及小吃的总脂肪和反式脂肪含量高于 GC 食品。GF 谷物小吃的钠含量高于 GC 小吃(GF:820 毫克与 GC:670 毫克;p<0.001)。
GF 食品的价格明显更高,其蛋白质和膳食纤维含量较低,脂肪、反式脂肪和钠含量较高。必须制定策略来降低 GF 食品的成本并改善其营养状况。