Missbach Benjamin, Schwingshackl Lukas, Billmann Alina, Mystek Aleksandra, Hickelsberger Melanie, Bauer Gregor, König Jürgen
Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria.
Department of Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition , Nuthetal , Germany.
PeerJ. 2015 Oct 22;3:e1337. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1337. eCollection 2015.
Notwithstanding a growth in popularity and consumption of gluten-free (GF) food products, there is a lack of substantiated analysis of the nutritional quality compared with their gluten-containing counterparts. To put GF foods into proper perspective both for those who need it (patients with celiac disease) and for those who do not, we provide contemporary data about cost and nutritional quality of GF food products. The objective of this study is to develop a food composition database for seven discretionary food categories of packaged GF products. Nutrient composition, nutritional information and cost of foods from 63 GF and 126 gluten-containing counterparts were systematically obtained from 12 different Austrian supermarkets. The nutrition composition (macro and micronutrients) was analyzed by using two nutrient composition databases in a stepwise approximation process. A total of 63 packaged GF foods were included in the analysis representing a broad spectrum of different GF categories (flour/bake mix, bread and bakery products, pasta and cereal-based food, cereals, cookies and cakes, snacks and convenience food). Our results show that the protein content of GF products is >2 fold lower across 57% of all food categories. In 65% of all GF foods, low sodium content was observed (defined as <120 mg/100 g). Across all GF products, 19% can be classified as source high in fiber (defined as >6g/100 g). On average, GF foods were substantially higher in cost, ranging from +205% (cereals) to +267% (bread and bakery products) compared to similar gluten-containing products. In conclusion, our results indicate that for GF foods no predominant health benefits are indicated; in fact, some critical nutrients must be considered when being on a GF diet. For individuals with celiac disease, the GF database provides a helpful tool to identify the food composition of their medical diet. For healthy consumers, replacing gluten-containing products with GF foods is aligned with substantial cost differences but GF foods do not provide additional health benefits from a nutritional perspective.
尽管无麸质(GF)食品的受欢迎程度和消费量有所增长,但与含麸质的同类食品相比,对其营养质量缺乏实证分析。为了让需要无麸质食品的人(乳糜泻患者)和不需要的人都能正确看待GF食品,我们提供了有关GF食品成本和营养质量的当代数据。本研究的目的是为七类包装GF产品建立一个食物成分数据库。从奥地利12家不同的超市系统地获取了63种GF食品和126种含麸质同类食品的营养成分、营养信息和成本。通过逐步近似法使用两个营养成分数据库对营养成分(宏量营养素和微量营养素)进行了分析。分析共纳入了63种包装GF食品,代表了广泛的不同GF类别(面粉/烘焙混合料、面包和烘焙食品、面食和谷类食品、谷物、饼干和蛋糕、零食和方便食品)。我们的结果表明,在所有食品类别中,57%的GF产品蛋白质含量低2倍以上。在所有GF食品中,65%的钠含量较低(定义为<120毫克/100克)。在所有GF产品中,19%可归类为高纤维来源(定义为>6克/100克)。平均而言,与类似的含麸质产品相比,GF食品的成本要高得多,从高出205%(谷物)到高出267%(面包和烘焙食品)不等。总之,我们的结果表明,GF食品没有明显的健康益处;事实上,采用GF饮食时必须考虑一些关键营养素。对于乳糜泻患者,GF数据库提供了一个有用的工具来识别他们医疗饮食的食物成分。对于健康消费者来说,用GF食品替代含麸质产品会带来巨大的成本差异,但从营养角度来看,GF食品并没有提供额外的健康益处。