Shibao Kodai, Shibata Tatsuhiro, Kitamura Chisato, Matushima Yoshihisa, Yoshiga Takumi, Yanai Toshiyuki, Homma Takehiro, Otsuka Maki, Murotani Kenta, Fukumoto Yoshihiro
From the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
Division of Cardiac Care Unit, Advanced Emergency Medical Service Center, Kurume University Hospital, Kurume, Japan.
ASAIO J. 2024 Dec 1;70(12):1017-1024. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002229. Epub 2024 May 15.
Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is a therapeutic strategy for managing cardiogenic shock. However, it carries the risk of cardiogenic pulmonary edema, potentially leading to differential hypoxia. Although IMPELLA can mitigate pulmonary congestion, the combination of VA-ECMO and IMPELLA has frequently resulted in differential hypoxia, requiring a transition from VA-ECMO to veno-arteriovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VAV-ECMO). Therefore, this study aimed to examine the influence of IMPELLA on the incidence of differential hypoxia, necessitating a shift to VAV-ECMO. This single-center, retrospective, observational study included patients who experienced cardiopulmonary arrest and received treatment with VA-ECMO combined with an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or IMPELLA between 2017 and 2022. The primary endpoint assessed the incidence of differential hypoxia, necessitating a switch to VAV-ECMO. Patients with cardiopulmonary arrest received treatment with VA-ECMO in combination with IABP (N = 28) or IMPELLA (N = 29). There was a significant increase in differential hypoxia 96 hours post-VA-ECMO initiation in the IMPELLA group, necessitating a transition to VAV-ECMO. The combination of VA-ECMO and IMPELLA in patients experiencing cardiopulmonary arrest may significantly increase the risk of differential hypoxia. A multidisciplinary approach employing mechanical circulatory support is crucial, with ongoing consideration of the potential risks associated with differential hypoxia.
静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合(VA-ECMO)是治疗心源性休克的一种策略。然而,它存在心源性肺水肿的风险,可能导致差异性缺氧。尽管Impella可减轻肺充血,但VA-ECMO与Impella联合使用常常导致差异性缺氧,需要从VA-ECMO过渡到静脉-动脉-静脉体外膜肺氧合(VAV-ECMO)。因此,本研究旨在探讨Impella对差异性缺氧发生率的影响,这种差异性缺氧需要转换为VAV-ECMO。这项单中心、回顾性、观察性研究纳入了2017年至2022年间经历心肺骤停并接受VA-ECMO联合主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)或Impella治疗的患者。主要终点评估了需要转换为VAV-ECMO的差异性缺氧的发生率。心肺骤停患者接受了VA-ECMO联合IABP(N = 28)或Impella(N = 29)的治疗。在Impella组中,VA-ECMO开始后96小时差异性缺氧显著增加,需要转换为VAV-ECMO。心肺骤停患者中VA-ECMO与Impella联合使用可能会显著增加差异性缺氧的风险。采用机械循环支持的多学科方法至关重要,同时要持续考虑与差异性缺氧相关的潜在风险。