Tentori Cristina A, Zhao Lin P, Tinterri Benedetta, Strange Kathryn E, Zoldan Katharina, Dimopoulos Konstantinos, Feng Xingmin, Riva Elena, Lim Benjamin, Simoni Yannick, Murthy Vidhya, Hayes Madeline J, Poloni Antonella, Padron Eric, Cardoso Bruno A, Cross Michael, Winter Susann, Santaolalla Aida, Patel Bhavisha A, Groarke Emma M, Wiseman Daniel H, Jones Katy, Jamieson Lauren, Manogaran Charles, Daver Naval, Gallur Laura, Ingram Wendy, Ferrell P Brent, Sockel Katja, Dulphy Nicolas, Chapuis Nicolas, Kubasch Anne S, Olsnes Astrid M, Kulasekararaj Austin, De Lavellade Hugues, Kern Wolfgang, Van Hemelrijck Mieke, Bonnet Dominique, Westers Theresia M, Freeman Sylvie, Oelschlaegel Uta, Valcarcel David, Raddi Marco G, Grønbæk Kirsten, Fontenay Michaela, Loghavi Sanam, Santini Valeria, Almeida Antonio M, Irish Jonathan M, Sallman David A, Young Neal S, van de Loosdrecht Arjan A, Adès Lionel, Della Porta Matteo G, Cargo Catherine, Platzbecker Uwe, Kordasti Shahram
Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS & Department of Biomedical Sciences Humanitas University Milan Italy.
Comprehensive Cancer Centre, King's College London UK.
Hemasphere. 2024 May 15;8(5):e64. doi: 10.1002/hem3.64. eCollection 2024 May.
Advancements in comprehending myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) have unfolded significantly in recent years, elucidating a myriad of cellular and molecular underpinnings integral to disease progression. While molecular inclusions into prognostic models have substantively advanced risk stratification, recent revelations have emphasized the pivotal role of immune dysregulation within the bone marrow milieu during MDS evolution. Nonetheless, immunotherapy for MDS has not experienced breakthroughs seen in other malignancies, partly attributable to the absence of an immune classification that could stratify patients toward optimally targeted immunotherapeutic approaches. A pivotal obstacle to establishing "immune classes" among MDS patients is the absence of validated accepted immune panels suitable for routine application in clinical laboratories. In response, we formed International Integrative Innovative Immunology for MDS (i4MDS), a consortium of multidisciplinary experts, and created the following recommendations for standardized methodologies to monitor immune responses in MDS. A central goal of i4MDS is the development of an immune score that could be incorporated into current clinical risk stratification models. This position paper first consolidates current knowledge on MDS immunology. Subsequently, in collaboration with clinical and laboratory specialists, we introduce flow cytometry panels and cytokine assays, meticulously devised for clinical laboratories, aiming to monitor the immune status of MDS patients, evaluating both immune fitness and identifying potential immune "risk factors." By amalgamating this immunological characterization data and molecular data, we aim to enhance patient stratification, identify predictive markers for treatment responsiveness, and accelerate the development of systems immunology tools and innovative immunotherapies.
近年来,在理解骨髓增生异常肿瘤(MDS)方面取得了显著进展,阐明了许多与疾病进展相关的细胞和分子基础。虽然将分子因素纳入预后模型已实质性地推进了风险分层,但最近的研究发现强调了骨髓微环境中免疫失调在MDS演变过程中的关键作用。尽管如此,MDS的免疫治疗尚未取得在其他恶性肿瘤中所见的突破,部分原因是缺乏一种能够将患者分层以采用最佳靶向免疫治疗方法的免疫分类。在MDS患者中建立“免疫类别”的一个关键障碍是缺乏适用于临床实验室常规应用的经过验证的公认免疫检测指标。作为回应,我们成立了国际MDS综合创新免疫学联盟(i4MDS),这是一个多学科专家组成的联盟,并为监测MDS免疫反应的标准化方法制定了以下建议。i4MDS的一个核心目标是开发一种免疫评分,可纳入当前的临床风险分层模型。本立场文件首先整合了目前关于MDS免疫学的知识。随后,我们与临床和实验室专家合作,介绍了专门为临床实验室设计的流式细胞术检测指标和细胞因子检测方法,旨在监测MDS患者的免疫状态,评估免疫适应性并识别潜在的免疫“风险因素”。通过整合这些免疫学特征数据和分子数据,我们旨在加强患者分层,识别治疗反应的预测标志物,并加速系统免疫学工具和创新免疫疗法的开发。