Suppr超能文献

一种用于在迫选测量中纳入反应时间的项目反应理论模型。

An Item Response Theory Model for Incorporating Response Times in Forced-Choice Measures.

作者信息

Guo Zhichen, Wang Daxun, Cai Yan, Tu Dongbo

机构信息

Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, China.

出版信息

Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Jun;84(3):450-480. doi: 10.1177/00131644231171193. Epub 2023 Jun 4.

Abstract

Forced-choice (FC) measures have been widely used in many personality or attitude tests as an alternative to rating scales, which employ comparative rather than absolute judgments. Several response biases, such as social desirability, response styles, and acquiescence bias, can be reduced effectively. Another type of data linked with comparative judgments is response time (RT), which contains potential information concerning respondents' decision-making process. It would be challenging but exciting to combine RT into FC measures better to reveal respondents' behaviors or preferences in personality measurement. Given this situation, this study aims to propose a new item response theory (IRT) model that incorporates RT into FC measures to improve personality assessment. Simulation studies show that the proposed model can effectively improve the estimation accuracy of personality traits with the ancillary information contained in RT. Also, an application on a real data set reveals that the proposed model estimates similar but different parameter values compared with the conventional Thurstonian IRT model. The RT information can explain these differences.

摘要

迫选(FC)测量方法已在许多人格或态度测试中广泛使用,作为评级量表的替代方法,评级量表采用的是比较判断而非绝对判断。一些反应偏差,如社会赞许性、反应方式和默许偏差,都可以有效减少。与比较判断相关的另一类数据是反应时间(RT),它包含有关受访者决策过程的潜在信息。将反应时间纳入迫选测量以更好地揭示受访者在人格测量中的行为或偏好,这将具有挑战性但令人兴奋。鉴于这种情况,本研究旨在提出一种新的项目反应理论(IRT)模型,该模型将反应时间纳入迫选测量以改进人格评估。模拟研究表明,所提出的模型可以利用反应时间中包含的辅助信息有效提高人格特质的估计准确性。此外,在一个真实数据集上的应用表明,与传统的瑟斯顿IRT模型相比,所提出的模型估计的参数值相似但不同。反应时间信息可以解释这些差异。

相似文献

5
On the Information Obtainable from Comparative Judgments.论从比较判断中可获取的信息。
Psychometrika. 2022 Dec;87(4):1439-1472. doi: 10.1007/s11336-022-09843-z. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
9
Investigating the Normativity of Trait Estimates from Multidimensional Forced-Choice Data.探究多维强制选择数据中特质估计的规范性
Multivariate Behav Res. 2023 Jan-Feb;58(1):1-29. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2021.1938960. Epub 2021 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Multidimensional IRT for forced choice tests: A literature review.用于强迫选择测试的多维项目反应理论:文献综述。
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 22;10(5):e26884. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26884. eCollection 2024 Mar 15.

本文引用的文献

2
On the Information Obtainable from Comparative Judgments.论从比较判断中可获取的信息。
Psychometrika. 2022 Dec;87(4):1439-1472. doi: 10.1007/s11336-022-09843-z. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
3
An Attention-Based Diffusion Model for Psychometric Analyses.基于注意力的心理测量分析扩散模型。
Psychometrika. 2021 Dec;86(4):938-972. doi: 10.1007/s11336-021-09783-0. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
6
On the Statistical and Practical Limitations of Thurstonian IRT Models.关于瑟斯顿IRT模型的统计及实际局限性
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Oct;79(5):827-854. doi: 10.1177/0013164419832063. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
10
Comparing Traditional and IRT Scoring of Forced-Choice Tests.比较强制选择测试的传统评分与项目反应理论评分
Appl Psychol Meas. 2015 Nov;39(8):598-612. doi: 10.1177/0146621615585851. Epub 2015 May 19.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验