• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
An Item Response Theory Model for Incorporating Response Times in Forced-Choice Measures.一种用于在迫选测量中纳入反应时间的项目反应理论模型。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Jun;84(3):450-480. doi: 10.1177/00131644231171193. Epub 2023 Jun 4.
2
Joint modeling of the two-alternative multidimensional forced-choice personality measurement and its response time by a Thurstonian D-diffusion item response model.采用 Thurstonian D-扩散项目反应模型对二择一式多维强迫选择人格测量及其反应时间进行联合建模。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Jun;52(3):1091-1107. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01302-5.
3
A Bayesian Random Block Item Response Theory Model for Forced-Choice Formats.一种用于强制选择格式的贝叶斯随机块项目反应理论模型。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2020 Jun;80(3):578-603. doi: 10.1177/0013164419871659. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
4
Linear Ballistic Accumulator Item Response Theory Model for Multidimensional Multiple-Alternative Forced-Choice Measurement of Personality.线性弹道累加器项目反应理论模型在人格多维多项迫选测量中的应用。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2022 Jul-Aug;57(4):658-678. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2021.1896351. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
5
On the Information Obtainable from Comparative Judgments.论从比较判断中可获取的信息。
Psychometrika. 2022 Dec;87(4):1439-1472. doi: 10.1007/s11336-022-09843-z. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
6
Forced-Choice Assessment of Work-Related Maladaptive Personality Traits: Preliminary Evidence From an Application of Thurstonian Item Response Modeling.工作相关适应不良人格特质的迫选评估:特伦斯项目反应建模应用的初步证据。
Assessment. 2018 Jun;25(4):513-526. doi: 10.1177/1073191116641181. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
7
Modeling Multidimensional Forced Choice Measures with the Zinnes and Griggs Pairwise Preference Item Response Theory Model.用 Zinnes 和 Griggs 成对偏好项目反应理论模型对多维多项选择测度进行建模。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2023 Mar-Apr;58(2):241-261. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2021.1960142. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
8
Bayesian Thurstonian IRT Modeling: Logical Dependencies as an Accurate Reflection of Thurstone's Law of Comparative Judgment.贝叶斯瑟斯顿IRT建模:逻辑依赖关系作为瑟斯顿比较判断定律的准确反映。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2025 May 30:00131644251335586. doi: 10.1177/00131644251335586.
9
Investigating the Normativity of Trait Estimates from Multidimensional Forced-Choice Data.探究多维强制选择数据中特质估计的规范性
Multivariate Behav Res. 2023 Jan-Feb;58(1):1-29. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2021.1938960. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
10
Integration of the Forced-Choice Questionnaire and the Likert Scale: A Simulation Study.强制选择问卷与李克特量表的整合:一项模拟研究。
Front Psychol. 2017 May 18;8:806. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00806. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Multidimensional IRT for forced choice tests: A literature review.用于强迫选择测试的多维项目反应理论:文献综述。
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 22;10(5):e26884. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26884. eCollection 2024 Mar 15.

本文引用的文献

1
On Bank Assembly and Block Selection in Multidimensional Forced-Choice Adaptive Assessments.多维强制选择自适应评估中的题库组装与题目选择
Educ Psychol Meas. 2023 Apr;83(2):294-321. doi: 10.1177/00131644221087986. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
2
On the Information Obtainable from Comparative Judgments.论从比较判断中可获取的信息。
Psychometrika. 2022 Dec;87(4):1439-1472. doi: 10.1007/s11336-022-09843-z. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
3
An Attention-Based Diffusion Model for Psychometric Analyses.基于注意力的心理测量分析扩散模型。
Psychometrika. 2021 Dec;86(4):938-972. doi: 10.1007/s11336-021-09783-0. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
4
Joint modeling of the two-alternative multidimensional forced-choice personality measurement and its response time by a Thurstonian D-diffusion item response model.采用 Thurstonian D-扩散项目反应模型对二择一式多维强迫选择人格测量及其反应时间进行联合建模。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Jun;52(3):1091-1107. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01302-5.
5
Different Styles, Different Times: How Response Times Can Inform Our Knowledge About the Response Process in Rating Scale Measurement.不同风格,不同时代:反应时如何为我们了解评分量表测量中的反应过程提供信息。
Assessment. 2021 Jul;28(5):1301-1319. doi: 10.1177/1073191119900003. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
6
On the Statistical and Practical Limitations of Thurstonian IRT Models.关于瑟斯顿IRT模型的统计及实际局限性
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Oct;79(5):827-854. doi: 10.1177/0013164419832063. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
7
On the Validity of Forced Choice Scores Derived From the Thurstonian Item Response Theory Model.从 Thurstonian 项目反应理论模型得出的强迫选择分数的有效性。
Assessment. 2020 Jun;27(4):706-718. doi: 10.1177/1073191119843585. Epub 2019 Apr 21.
8
Comparison of Single-Response Format and Forced-Choice Format Instruments Using Thurstonian Item Response Theory.使用瑟斯顿项目反应理论对单反应格式和强制选择格式工具进行比较。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Feb;79(1):108-128. doi: 10.1177/0013164417752782. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
9
A Dominance Variant Under the Multi-Unidimensional Pairwise-Preference Framework: Model Formulation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Estimation.多维度成对偏好框架下的一个显性变异:模型构建与马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗估计
Appl Psychol Meas. 2016 Oct;40(7):500-516. doi: 10.1177/0146621616662226. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
10
Comparing Traditional and IRT Scoring of Forced-Choice Tests.比较强制选择测试的传统评分与项目反应理论评分
Appl Psychol Meas. 2015 Nov;39(8):598-612. doi: 10.1177/0146621615585851. Epub 2015 May 19.

一种用于在迫选测量中纳入反应时间的项目反应理论模型。

An Item Response Theory Model for Incorporating Response Times in Forced-Choice Measures.

作者信息

Guo Zhichen, Wang Daxun, Cai Yan, Tu Dongbo

机构信息

Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, China.

出版信息

Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Jun;84(3):450-480. doi: 10.1177/00131644231171193. Epub 2023 Jun 4.

DOI:10.1177/00131644231171193
PMID:38756463
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11095319/
Abstract

Forced-choice (FC) measures have been widely used in many personality or attitude tests as an alternative to rating scales, which employ comparative rather than absolute judgments. Several response biases, such as social desirability, response styles, and acquiescence bias, can be reduced effectively. Another type of data linked with comparative judgments is response time (RT), which contains potential information concerning respondents' decision-making process. It would be challenging but exciting to combine RT into FC measures better to reveal respondents' behaviors or preferences in personality measurement. Given this situation, this study aims to propose a new item response theory (IRT) model that incorporates RT into FC measures to improve personality assessment. Simulation studies show that the proposed model can effectively improve the estimation accuracy of personality traits with the ancillary information contained in RT. Also, an application on a real data set reveals that the proposed model estimates similar but different parameter values compared with the conventional Thurstonian IRT model. The RT information can explain these differences.

摘要

迫选(FC)测量方法已在许多人格或态度测试中广泛使用,作为评级量表的替代方法,评级量表采用的是比较判断而非绝对判断。一些反应偏差,如社会赞许性、反应方式和默许偏差,都可以有效减少。与比较判断相关的另一类数据是反应时间(RT),它包含有关受访者决策过程的潜在信息。将反应时间纳入迫选测量以更好地揭示受访者在人格测量中的行为或偏好,这将具有挑战性但令人兴奋。鉴于这种情况,本研究旨在提出一种新的项目反应理论(IRT)模型,该模型将反应时间纳入迫选测量以改进人格评估。模拟研究表明,所提出的模型可以利用反应时间中包含的辅助信息有效提高人格特质的估计准确性。此外,在一个真实数据集上的应用表明,与传统的瑟斯顿IRT模型相比,所提出的模型估计的参数值相似但不同。反应时间信息可以解释这些差异。