• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价抗菌手术预防时机对手术部位感染发生率的影响。

Evaluation of Timing of Antimicrobial Surgical Prophylaxis on Rates of Surgical Site Infections.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Services, Hartford HealthCare, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.

Department of Research Administration, Hartford HealthCare, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2024 Jun;25(5):392-398. doi: 10.1089/sur.2024.010. Epub 2024 May 17.

DOI:10.1089/sur.2024.010
PMID:38758048
Abstract

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common healthcare-associated infections, and national guidelines recommend that antimicrobial prophylaxis (AP) be administered 60 min prior to incision. However, there are limited data regarding the "most optimal" time for administration within the 60-min window. This was a multicenter, retrospective study of adult (≥18-year-old) patients that underwent an abdominal hysterectomy, colorectal surgery, or craniotomy and received AP within 60 min of incision. Incidence of SSI was compared between patients who received AP 0-30 versus 31-60 min of incision. In addition, a predefined subgroup analysis evaluated incidence of SSI for 15-min intervals within the 60-min timeframe. Of the 277 patients included in the primary analysis, 233 (84.1%) and 44 (15.9%) received AP 0-30 min and 31-60 min prior to incision, respectively. SSIs were documented in 6.0% (14/233) versus 4.5% (2/44) of patients in the primary analysis (p = 0.703). In the secondary analysis, 137 (49.5%), 95 (34.3%), 34 (12.3%), and 11 (4.0%) patients received AP 0-15, 16-30, 31-45, and 46-60 min prior to incision, respectively. There was no difference in incidence of SSIs among the 15-min intervals (4.4% vs. 8.4% vs. 2.9% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.487). Of the 16 patients in this study that incurred a SSI, 5 patients had positive cultures, of which 3 contained bacteria that proved to be resistant to the antibiotic used for AP. The results of our analysis support current national guidelines. Future investigation of different intervals (e.g., AP 15-45 min prior to incision) may be beneficial on the basis of pharmacokinetics of routinely prescribed AP.

摘要

手术部位感染(SSI)是常见的与医疗保健相关的感染,国家指南建议在切口前 60 分钟内给予抗菌预防(AP)。然而,在 60 分钟窗口内给药的“最佳”时间方面,数据有限。这是一项多中心、回顾性研究,纳入了接受腹部子宫切除术、结直肠手术或颅切开术且在切口前 60 分钟内接受 AP 的成年(≥18 岁)患者。比较了在切口前 0-30 分钟和 31-60 分钟接受 AP 的患者之间 SSI 的发生率。此外,还进行了一项预设的亚组分析,评估了 60 分钟时间框架内每 15 分钟间隔的 SSI 发生率。在主要分析中,纳入了 277 例患者,其中 233 例(84.1%)和 44 例(15.9%)在切口前 0-30 分钟和 31-60 分钟内接受 AP,分别有 6.0%(14/233)和 4.5%(2/44)的患者在主要分析中发生 SSI(p=0.703)。在次要分析中,137 例(49.5%)、95 例(34.3%)、34 例(12.3%)和 11 例(4.0%)患者分别在切口前 0-15、16-30、31-45 和 46-60 分钟内接受 AP。在各个 15 分钟间隔内,SSI 的发生率无差异(4.4%比 8.4%比 2.9%比 9.1%,p=0.487)。在本研究中发生 SSI 的 16 例患者中,5 例患者的培养物呈阳性,其中 3 例含有对抗生素预防(AP)具有耐药性的细菌。我们的分析结果支持当前的国家指南。基于常规规定的 AP 的药代动力学,对不同间隔(例如,在切口前 15-45 分钟给予 AP)进行进一步研究可能会有所帮助。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Timing of Antimicrobial Surgical Prophylaxis on Rates of Surgical Site Infections.评价抗菌手术预防时机对手术部位感染发生率的影响。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2024 Jun;25(5):392-398. doi: 10.1089/sur.2024.010. Epub 2024 May 17.
2
Risk of surgical site infection, acute kidney injury, and Clostridium difficile infection following antibiotic prophylaxis with vancomycin plus a beta-lactam versus either drug alone: A national propensity-score-adjusted retrospective cohort study.万古霉素联合β-内酰胺类抗生素与单独使用任一药物进行抗生素预防后手术部位感染、急性肾损伤和艰难梭菌感染的风险:一项全国倾向评分调整后的回顾性队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2017 Jul 10;14(7):e1002340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002340. eCollection 2017 Jul.
3
Antibiotic regimen and the timing of prophylaxis are important for reducing surgical site infection after elective abdominal colorectal surgery.抗生素方案和预防时机对于降低择期腹部结直肠手术后手术部位感染很重要。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2011 Aug;12(4):255-60. doi: 10.1089/sur.2010.073. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
4
Optimal time window for initiating cefuroxime surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in spinal fusion surgery: a nested case-control study.在脊柱融合手术中启动头孢呋辛手术抗菌预防的最佳时间窗口:一项嵌套病例对照研究。
Spine J. 2024 Jun;24(6):961-968. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.01.013. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
5
Timing of Cefuroxime Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis and Its Association With Surgical Site Infections.头孢呋辛手术抗菌预防的时机及其与手术部位感染的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2317370. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17370.
6
Timing of antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean section: retrospective, difference-in-differences estimation of the effect on surgical-site-infection.剖宫产术中抗生素预防性使用的时机:关于手术部位感染影响的回顾性差异估计
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Mar;32(5):804-808. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1391784. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
7
Violation of prophylactic vancomycin administration timing is a potential risk factor for rate of surgical site infections in cardiac surgery patients: a prospective cohort study.违反预防性万古霉素给药时机是心脏手术患者手术部位感染发生率的一个潜在风险因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Mar 8;17(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0506-5.
8
Timing of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis and the risk of surgical site infection.手术抗生素预防的时机与手术部位感染的风险。
JAMA Surg. 2013 Jul;148(7):649-57. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.134.
9
Optimal timing for antimicrobial prophylaxis to reduce surgical site infections: a retrospective analysis of 531 patients.优化抗菌预防时机以降低手术部位感染:531 例患者的回顾性分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 9;13(1):9405. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36588-1.
10
Surgical site infection prophylaxis strategies for cardiothoracic surgery: a decision-analytic model.心胸外科手术部位感染预防策略:一项决策分析模型
Scand J Infect Dis. 2012 Dec;44(12):948-55. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2012.700118. Epub 2012 Jul 25.