• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

紧急再次剖腹手术:高风险、别无选择的手术。

Urgent relaparotomy: the high-risk, no-choice operation.

作者信息

Bunt T J

出版信息

Surgery. 1985 Sep;98(3):555-60.

PMID:3875907
Abstract

Two thousand six hundred fifty-seven primary laparotomies were performed during a 50-month period; 192 (7%) of these were relaparotomies within 21 days for complications of primary laparotomy. The overall mortality rate was 36% (69/192). Relaparotomy for dehiscence (0/15) or obstruction (5%-1/21) carried little risk and for abscess a moderate risk (13%-6/47). Relaparotomy for gastrointestinal or intraperitoneal hemorrhage entailed higher risks at 44% (4/9) and 27% (6/22), respectively. Age was a significant determinant of mortality, being 16% (13/82) for less than 50 years of age but 50% (56/110) for greater than 50 years (p less than 0.001). The major determinant at all age groups was sepsis, varying from 50% (4/8) for patients less than 50 years to 89% (34/38) for patients greater than 50 years (p less than 0.01). Differentiation was made between localized intra-abdominal infection (IAS-1) and nonlocalized/systemic infection (IAS-2): the mortality rate for 47 patients with IAS-1 was 13% and for IAS-2 83% (p less than 0.001). Urgent relaparotomy is necessary and may be performed safely for incisional dehiscence, obstruction, or IAS-1, with low mortality and high patient salvage rates. Directed relaparotomy for IAS-2 carries a high mortality rate but is the only means of patient salvage. Nondirected relaparotomy for multiple system and organ failure alone without supportive clinical or radiologic findings was futile, with a 13% (2/15) rate of positive exploration (p less than 0.001) and no patient salvage.

摘要

在50个月的时间里共进行了2657例初次剖腹手术;其中192例(7%)因初次剖腹手术并发症在21天内进行了再次剖腹手术。总体死亡率为36%(69/192)。因切口裂开(0/15)或肠梗阻(5% - 1/21)进行再次剖腹手术风险较小,因脓肿进行再次剖腹手术风险适中(13% - 6/47)。因胃肠道或腹腔内出血进行再次剖腹手术风险较高,分别为44%(4/9)和27%(6/22)。年龄是死亡率的一个重要决定因素,小于50岁的患者死亡率为16%(13/82),而大于50岁的患者死亡率为50%(56/110)(p < 0.001)。所有年龄组的主要决定因素是脓毒症,小于50岁的患者中脓毒症发生率为50%(4/8),大于50岁的患者中为89%(34/38)(p < 0.01)。区分了局限性腹腔内感染(IAS - 1)和非局限性/全身性感染(IAS - 2):47例IAS - 1患者的死亡率为13%,IAS - 2患者的死亡率为83%(p < 0.001)。对于切口裂开、肠梗阻或IAS - 1,紧急再次剖腹手术是必要的且可以安全进行,死亡率低且患者挽救率高。针对IAS - 2进行有针对性的再次剖腹手术死亡率高,但却是挽救患者的唯一方法。对于无支持性临床或影像学表现的多系统和器官衰竭单独进行无针对性的再次剖腹手术是徒劳的,阳性探查率为13%(2/15)(p < 0.001),且无患者获救。

相似文献

1
Urgent relaparotomy: the high-risk, no-choice operation.紧急再次剖腹手术:高风险、别无选择的手术。
Surgery. 1985 Sep;98(3):555-60.
2
Non-directed relaparotomy for intra-abdominal sepsis. A futile procedure.针对腹腔内感染进行的非定向再次剖腹手术。一项徒劳的操作。
Am Surg. 1986 Jun;52(6):294-8.
3
Relaparotomy: a five-year review of indications and outcome.再次剖腹术:指征与结果的五年回顾
Int J Clin Pract. 2003 May;57(4):333-7.
4
Relaparotomy. A ten-year series.再次剖腹术。十年病例系列
Acta Chir Scand. 1975;141(7):637-44.
5
Emergency abdominal re-exploration in a district general hospital.地区综合医院的急诊腹部再次探查术
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1987 Jul;69(4):169-74.
6
[Emergency relaparotomy in children].
Vestn Khir Im I I Grek. 1984 Apr;132(4):95-8.
7
[Risk factors in emergency surgery relaparotomy].
Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 1994 Jan-Feb;49(1):17-20.
8
[Relaparotomy in childhood].
Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1986;367(3):167-80. doi: 10.1007/BF01258935.
9
Complications of planned relaparotomy in patients with severe general peritonitis.重症弥漫性腹膜炎患者计划性再次剖腹手术的并发症
Eur J Surg. 1997 Jan;163(1):61-6.
10
Re-operation for complicated secondary peritonitis - how to identify patients at risk for persistent sepsis.复杂性继发性腹膜炎的再次手术——如何识别有持续性脓毒症风险的患者。
Eur J Med Res. 2003 Mar 27;8(3):125-34.

引用本文的文献

1
[Treatment of postoperative peritonitis in the Intensive Care Unit: a retrospective study of 46 cases].重症监护病房术后腹膜炎的治疗:46例回顾性研究
Pan Afr Med J. 2022 Nov 4;43:125. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2022.43.125.14331. eCollection 2022.
2
[Study of early relaparotomies at the University Hospitals of Lubumbashi: epidemiological clinical and therapeutic features].[卢本巴希大学医院早期再次剖腹手术的研究:流行病学、临床及治疗特征]
Pan Afr Med J. 2018 Jun 13;30:127. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2018.30.127.12609. eCollection 2018.
3
Relaparotomies: Why is Mortality Higher?
再次剖腹手术:为何死亡率更高?
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2009 Dec;35(6):547-52. doi: 10.1007/s00068-009-8221-2. Epub 2009 May 12.
4
Postoperative peritonitis without an underlying digestive fistula after complete cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC.完全细胞减灭术加 HIPEC 术后无潜在消化道瘘的腹膜炎。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2013 Nov-Dec;19(6):271-7. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.121033.
5
Surgical hemorrhage, damage control, and the abdominal compartment syndrome.手术出血、损伤控制与腹腔间隔室综合征
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2006 Nov;19(4):188-94. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-956439.
6
Complication rates among trauma centers.创伤中心的并发症发生率。
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Nov;209(5):595-602. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.08.003. Epub 2009 Sep 19.
7
Preoperative risk factors for mortality after relaparotomy: analysis of 254 patients.再次剖腹手术后死亡的术前危险因素:254 例患者分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010 Jun;395(5):527-34. doi: 10.1007/s00423-009-0538-0. Epub 2009 Jul 18.
8
Clinical predictors of ongoing infection in secondary peritonitis: systematic review.继发性腹膜炎持续感染的临床预测因素:系统评价
World J Surg. 2006 Dec;30(12):2170-81. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0333-1.
9
Relaparotomy for suspected intraperitoneal sepsis after abdominal surgery.腹部手术后因怀疑腹腔内感染而行再次剖腹手术。
World J Surg. 2004 Feb;28(2):137-41. doi: 10.1007/s00268-003-7067-8. Epub 2004 Jan 8.
10
Is repeat laparotomy of value in patients with suspected intra-abdominal sepsis in the intensive care unit?对于重症监护病房中疑似腹腔内感染的患者,再次剖腹手术是否有价值?
Ir J Med Sci. 1997 Apr-Jun;166(2):88-91. doi: 10.1007/BF02944195.