• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迈向研究生医学教育中的包容性学习环境:荷兰家庭医学专科培训中的利益相关者驱动策略。

Towards inclusive learning environments in post-graduate medical education: stakeholder-driven strategies in Dutch GP-specialty training.

机构信息

Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of General Practice and Public Health Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.

Department of General Practice, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 17;24(1):550. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05521-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-024-05521-z
PMID:38760775
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11100146/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A recent study found that ethnic minority General Practice (GP)-trainees receive more negative assessments than their majority peers. Previous qualitative research suggested that learning climate-related factors play a pivotal role in unequal opportunities for trainees in post-graduate medical settings, indicating that insufficient inclusivity had put minority students at risk of failure and dropout.

STUDY OBJECTIVES

We aimed to develop broadly supported strategies for an inclusive learning climate in Dutch GP-specialty training.

METHODS

We employed Participatory Action Research (PAR)-methods, incorporating Participatory Learning and Action (PLA)-techniques to ensure equal voices for all stakeholders in shaping Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI)-strategies for GP-specialty training. Our approach engaged stakeholders within two pilot GP-specialty training institutes across diverse roles, including management, support staff, in-faculty teachers, in-clinic supervisors, and trainees, representing ethnic minorities and the majority population. Purposeful convenience sampling formed stakeholder- and co-reader groups in two Dutch GP-specialty training institutes. Stakeholder discussion sessions were based on experiences and literature, including two relevant frameworks, and explored perspectives on the dynamics of potential ethnic minority trainees' disadvantages and opportunities for inclusive strategies. A co-reader group commented on discussion outcomes. Consequently, a management group prioritized suggested strategies based on expected feasibility and compatibility.

RESULTS

Input from twelve stakeholder group sessions and thirteen co-readers led to implementation guidance for seven inclusive learning environment strategies, of which the management group prioritized three: • Provide DEI-relevant training programs to all GP-specialty training stakeholders; • Appoint DEI ambassadors in all layers of GP-specialty training; • Give a significant voice to minority GP-trainees in their education.

CONCLUSION

The study's participatory approach engaged representatives of all GP-specialty training stakeholders and identified seven inclusive learning climate strategies, of which three were prioritized for implementation in two training institutions.

摘要

背景

最近的一项研究发现,少数族裔的全科医生(GP)培训生比大多数同龄人收到更多的负面评估。先前的定性研究表明,学习氛围相关因素在研究生医学环境中对培训生机会不均等起着关键作用,这表明少数民族学生由于包容性不足而面临失败和辍学的风险。

研究目的

我们旨在为荷兰全科医学专科培训制定包容性学习氛围的广泛支持策略。

方法

我们采用参与式行动研究(PAR)方法,结合参与式学习和行动(PLA)技术,确保所有利益相关者在塑造全科医学专科培训的多样性、公平性和包容性(DEI)策略方面都有平等的话语权。我们的方法在两个试点全科医学专科培训学院中吸引了来自不同角色的利益相关者,包括管理人员、支持人员、学院内教师、临床监督人员和代表少数民族和大多数人口的培训生。目的便利抽样形成了两个荷兰全科医学专科培训学院的利益相关者和共同读者群体。利益相关者讨论会议基于经验和文献,包括两个相关框架,探讨了潜在少数民族培训生劣势和包容性策略机会的动态。一个共同读者小组对讨论结果进行了评论。随后,管理小组根据预期的可行性和兼容性对建议策略进行了优先级排序。

结果

来自十二次利益相关者小组会议和十三个共同读者的意见,为七项包容性学习环境策略提供了实施指南,管理小组对其中三项进行了优先级排序:

  1. 为所有全科医学专科培训的利益相关者提供 DEI 相关培训计划;

  2. 在全科医学专科培训的各个层次任命 DEI 大使;

  3. 在他们的教育中给予少数族裔全科培训生重要的发言权。

结论

该研究的参与式方法吸引了所有全科医学专科培训利益相关者的代表,并确定了七项包容性学习氛围策略,其中三项在两个培训机构中被优先实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be3e/11100146/b47eeea95691/12909_2024_5521_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be3e/11100146/9ac2fa50f832/12909_2024_5521_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be3e/11100146/d848e0f7f5a5/12909_2024_5521_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be3e/11100146/0de24e1d0bc0/12909_2024_5521_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be3e/11100146/b47eeea95691/12909_2024_5521_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be3e/11100146/9ac2fa50f832/12909_2024_5521_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be3e/11100146/d848e0f7f5a5/12909_2024_5521_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be3e/11100146/0de24e1d0bc0/12909_2024_5521_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be3e/11100146/b47eeea95691/12909_2024_5521_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Towards inclusive learning environments in post-graduate medical education: stakeholder-driven strategies in Dutch GP-specialty training.迈向研究生医学教育中的包容性学习环境:荷兰家庭医学专科培训中的利益相关者驱动策略。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 17;24(1):550. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05521-z.
2
Ethnic minority GP trainees at risk for underperformance assessments: a quantitative cohort study.少数族裔全科医生培训生面临评估成绩不佳的风险:一项定量队列研究。
BJGP Open. 2023 Mar 21;7(1). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0082. Print 2023 Mar.
3
Professionals' perspectives on factors affecting GP trainees' patient mix: results from an interview and focus group study among professionals working in Dutch general practice.专业人士视角下影响全科医师培训生患者构成的因素:荷兰全科医疗领域专业人士访谈和焦点小组研究的结果。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 15;9(12):e032182. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032182.
4
How does portfolio use support self-regulated learning during general practitioner specialty training? A qualitative focus group study.组合投资如何在全科医生专科培训中支持自我调节学习?一项定性焦点小组研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 10;13(2):e066879. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066879.
5
Opportunities and challenges of e-learning in vocational training in General Practice - a project report about implementing digital formats in the KWBW-Verbundweiterbildung.电子学习在全科医学职业培训中的机遇与挑战——KWBW-Verbundweiterbildung 引入数字化格式的项目报告。
GMS J Med Educ. 2020 Dec 3;37(7):Doc97. doi: 10.3205/zma001390. eCollection 2020.
6
Learning objectives of Belgian general practitioner trainees regarding their hospital training: A qualitative study.比利时全科医生培训生对其医院培训的学习目标:一项定性研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2022 Dec;28(1):173-181. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2022.2081319.
7
GP trainees' perceptions on learning EBM using conversations in the workplace: a video-stimulated interview study.全科住院医师在工作场所中通过对话学习循证医学的认知:一项基于视频的访谈研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 May 6;20(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02051-2.
8
General practice training environment and its impact on preparedness.全科医学培训环境及其对准备情况的影响。
Educ Prim Care. 2014 Jan;25(1):8-17. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2014.11494236.
9
Using Participatory Learning & Action (PLA) research techniques for inter-stakeholder dialogue in primary healthcare: an analysis of stakeholders' experiences.运用参与式学习与行动(PLA)研究技术开展基层医疗保健中的利益相关者间对话:利益相关者经验分析
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Dec 6;3:28. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0077-8. eCollection 2017.
10
Self-entrustment: how trainees' self-regulated learning supports participation in the workplace.自主委托:培训生的自我调节学习如何支持其参与工作场所。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2017 Oct;22(4):931-949. doi: 10.1007/s10459-016-9723-4. Epub 2016 Oct 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethnic minority GP trainees at risk for underperformance assessments: a quantitative cohort study.少数族裔全科医生培训生面临评估成绩不佳的风险:一项定量队列研究。
BJGP Open. 2023 Mar 21;7(1). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0082. Print 2023 Mar.
2
Review of Best Practices for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Committees Within Colleges of Pharmacy.药学学院多样性、公平性和包容性委员会最佳实践回顾。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Apr;87(4):ajpe9043. doi: 10.5688/ajpe9043. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
3
Participatory learning and action (PLA) to improve health outcomes in high-income settings: a systematic review protocol.
参与式学习和行动(PLA)改善高收入环境下的健康结果:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 28;12(2):e050784. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050784.
4
Rapid versus traditional qualitative analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).使用实施研究整合框架(CFIR)进行快速与传统定性分析。
Implement Sci. 2021 Jul 2;16(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01111-5.
5
Diversity in the Family Medicine Workforce.家庭医学劳动力的多样性。
Fam Med. 2021 Jul 7;53(7):640-643. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2021.284957. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
6
Applied Rapid Qualitative Analysis to Develop a Contextually Appropriate Intervention and Increase the Likelihood of Uptake.应用快速定性分析来制定一个具有文化适应性的干预措施,从而提高采用的可能性。
Med Care. 2021 Jun 1;59(Suppl 3):S242-S251. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001553.
7
Admissions Is Not Enough: The Racial Achievement Gap in Medical Education.招生还不够:医学教育中的种族成就差距。
Acad Med. 2021 Feb 1;96(2):176-181. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003837.
8
How Medical Educators Can Foster Equity and Inclusion in Their Teaching: A Faculty Development Workshop Series.如何在教学中培养医学教育者的公平与包容意识:教师发展工作坊系列。
Acad Med. 2020 Dec;95(12S Addressing Harmful Bias and Eliminating Discrimination in Health Professions Learning Environments):S71-S76. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003687.
9
They Don't See a Lot of People My Color: A Mixed Methods Study of Racial/Ethnic Stereotype Threat Among Medical Students on Core Clerkships.他们很少看到像我这样的人:核心实习医师中种族/民族刻板印象威胁的混合方法研究。
Acad Med. 2020 Nov;95(11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 59th Annual Research in Medical Education Presentations):S58-S66. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003628.
10
Rapid Techniques in Qualitative Research: A Critical Review of the Literature.快速定性研究技术:文献综述的批判性评价。
Qual Health Res. 2020 Aug;30(10):1596-1604. doi: 10.1177/1049732320921835.