Coulter Robert W S, Gartner Rachel E, Cramer Casey, Smith Emil K, Abebe Kaleab Z, Miller Elizabeth
University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2025 Feb;40(3-4):582-606. doi: 10.1177/08862605241253031. Epub 2024 May 18.
Sexual minority (e.g., gay/lesbian, bisexual, and queer) students are more likely than their heterosexual peers to experience sexual violence (SV) during college. Interventions that prevent SV and improve SV care-seeking behaviors for sexual minority students are lacking. is an evidence-based universal SV intervention implemented by providers during college health and counseling visits. Compared to controls, participants reported greater self-efficacy to use SV harm reduction strategies and SV disclosure during clinical visits. However, effectiveness for sexual minority participants is unknown. The current study examines whether sexual orientation moderates effects on numerous SV-related outcomes (i.e., to test whether intervention effects at 4 and 12 months differed based on sexual orientation). Across 28 college campuses in Pennsylvania and West Virginia, 2,291 students participated in a two-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial. We used mixed models with two- and three-way interaction terms to test whether sexual orientation modified effects at 4- and 12-month follow-up on participants': SV recognition; knowledge of and self-efficacy to enact SV harm reduction strategies; intentions to intervene; knowledge of and self-efficacy to use SV-related services; SV disclosure during visits; and recent SV exposure. Overall, 22.1% of participants were sexual minorities ( = 507). Sexual orientation moderated effectiveness as indicated by significant three-way interaction ( = .01) at 12-month follow-up, and knowledge of SV services decreased for heterosexual participants (β = -.23) but increased for sexual minority participants (β = .23). Our study indicates that universal provider-based education may promote greater knowledge of SV services among sexual minority than heterosexual participants, and population-specific interventions are needed that reduce sexual minority students' SV exposure, service utilization, and other critical aspects of SV prevention on university campuses. Registry name: College Health Center-based Alcohol and Sexual Violence Intervention (GIFTSS), Registration number: NCT02355470, Web link: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02355470, Deidentified individual participant data will not be made available.
性少数群体(如同性恋、双性恋和酷儿群体)的学生在大学期间遭受性暴力(SV)的可能性比异性恋同龄人更高。目前缺乏预防性少数群体学生遭受性暴力以及改善他们寻求性暴力相关护理行为的干预措施。[干预措施名称]是提供者在大学健康和咨询就诊期间实施的一项基于证据的普遍性性暴力干预措施。与对照组相比,[干预措施名称]的参与者报告称在临床就诊期间使用性暴力伤害减少策略和披露性暴力方面有更高的自我效能感。然而,其对性少数群体参与者的有效性尚不清楚。当前的研究调查性取向是否会调节[干预措施名称]对众多与性暴力相关结果的影响(即测试在4个月和12个月时的干预效果是否因性取向而异)。在宾夕法尼亚州和西弗吉尼亚州的28个大学校园中,2291名学生参与了一项双臂整群随机对照试验。我们使用带有双向和三向交互项的混合模型来测试性取向是否在4个月和12个月的随访中调节了[干预措施名称]对参与者以下方面的影响:性暴力认知;制定性暴力伤害减少策略的知识和自我效能感;干预意图;使用与性暴力相关服务的知识和自我效能感;就诊期间的性暴力披露;以及近期的性暴力暴露情况。总体而言,22.1%的参与者是性少数群体(n = 507)。在12个月的随访中,显著的三向交互作用(p = 0.01)表明性取向调节了[干预措施名称]的有效性,异性恋参与者对性暴力服务的了解减少(β = -0.23),而性少数群体参与者的了解增加(β = 0.23)。我们的研究表明,基于提供者的普遍性教育可能会促进性少数群体比异性恋参与者对性暴力服务有更多的了解,并且需要针对特定人群的干预措施来减少性少数群体学生在大学校园中的性暴力暴露、服务利用以及性暴力预防的其他关键方面。注册名称:基于大学健康中心的酒精和性暴力干预(GIFTSS),注册号:NCT02355470,网页链接:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02355470,将不会提供去识别化的个体参与者数据。