• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用超声测量的 DFT 确定颅内动脉瘤计算血流动力学的患者特定血流边界条件。

Using DFT on ultrasound measurements to determine patient-specific blood flow boundary conditions for computational hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms.

机构信息

Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Wright State University, Dayton, OH, 45435, USA.

Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Wright State University, Dayton, OH, 45435, USA.

出版信息

Comput Biol Med. 2024 Jun;176:108563. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108563. Epub 2024 May 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108563
PMID:38761498
Abstract

Boundary conditions (BCs) is one pivotal factor influencing the accuracy of hemodynamic predictions on intracranial aneurysms (IAs) using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling. Unfortunately, a standard procedure to secure accurate BCs for hemodynamic modeling does not exist. To bridge such a knowledge gap, two representative patient-specific IA models (Case-I and Case-II) were reconstructed and their blood flow velocity waveforms in the internal carotid artery (ICA) were measured by ultrasonic techniques and modeled by discrete Fourier transform (DFT). Then, numerical investigations were conducted to explore the appropriate number of samples (N) for DFT modeling to secure the accurate BC by comparing a series of hemodynamic parameters using in-vitro validated CFD modeling. Subsequently, a comprehensive comparison in hemodynamic characteristics under patient-specific BCs and a generalized BC based on a one-dimensional (1D) model was conducted to reinforce the understanding that a patient-specific BC is pivotal for accurate hemodynamic risk evaluations on IA pathophysiology. In addition, the influence of the variance of heart rate/cardiac pulsatile period on hemodynamic characteristics in IA models was studied preliminarily. The results showed that N ≥ 16 for DFT model is a decent choice to secure the proper BC profile to calculate time-averaged hemodynamic parameters, while more data points such as N ≥ 36 can ensure the accuracy of instantaneous hemodynamic predictions. In addition, results revealed the generalized BC could overestimate or underestimate the hemodynamic risks on IAs significantly; thus, patient-specific BCs are highly recommended for hemodynamic modeling for IA risk evaluation. Furthermore, this study discovered the variance of heart rate has rare influences on hemodynamic characteristics in both instantaneous and time-averaged parameters under the assumption of an identical blood flow rate.

摘要

边界条件 (BCs) 是影响使用计算流体动力学 (CFD) 模型对颅内动脉瘤 (IA) 进行血流动力学预测准确性的关键因素之一。不幸的是,目前尚不存在确保血流动力学建模准确边界条件的标准程序。为了弥补这一知识空白,本研究重建了两个具有代表性的患者特定的 IA 模型 (Case-I 和 Case-II),并使用超声技术测量了颈内动脉 (ICA) 中的血流速度波形,通过离散傅里叶变换 (DFT) 对其进行建模。然后,通过比较一系列使用体外验证的 CFD 建模的血流动力学参数,进行数值研究,以探索 DFT 建模中合适的样本数量 (N),从而确保准确的边界条件。随后,在患者特定的边界条件和基于一维 (1D) 模型的广义边界条件下,对血流动力学特征进行了全面比较,以强化这样一种认识,即患者特定的边界条件对于准确评估 IA 病理生理学中的血流动力学风险至关重要。此外,初步研究了心率/心脏脉动周期变化对 IA 模型血流动力学特征的影响。结果表明,对于 DFT 模型,N ≥ 16 是确保适当边界条件轮廓以计算时均血流动力学参数的不错选择,而更多的数据点,如 N ≥ 36,则可以确保瞬时血流动力学预测的准确性。此外,研究结果表明,广义边界条件可能会显著高估或低估 IA 的血流动力学风险;因此,强烈建议对 IA 风险评估的血流动力学建模采用患者特定的边界条件。此外,本研究发现,在假设相同血流量的情况下,心率的变化对瞬时和时均参数下的血流动力学特征的影响很小。

相似文献

1
Using DFT on ultrasound measurements to determine patient-specific blood flow boundary conditions for computational hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms.使用超声测量的 DFT 确定颅内动脉瘤计算血流动力学的患者特定血流边界条件。
Comput Biol Med. 2024 Jun;176:108563. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108563. Epub 2024 May 6.
2
Impact of blood viscosity on hemodynamics of large intracranial aneurysms.血液黏度对颅内大动脉瘤血流动力学的影响。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024 Nov;246:108543. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108543. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
3
How patient-specific do internal carotid artery inflow rates need to be for computational fluid dynamics of cerebral aneurysms?对于脑动脉瘤的计算流体动力学,颈内动脉流入率需要多精确地针对个体患者?
J Neurointerv Surg. 2021 May;13(5):459-464. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-015993. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
4
Inter-patient variations in flow boundary conditions at middle cerebral artery from 7T PC-MRI and influence on Computational Fluid Dynamics of intracranial aneurysms.7T PC-MRI 中大脑中动脉血流边界条件的患者间差异及其对颅内动脉瘤计算流体动力学的影响。
Comput Biol Med. 2020 May;120:103759. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103759. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
5
Computational hemodynamics in cerebral aneurysms: the effects of modeled versus measured boundary conditions.计算流体动力学在颅内动脉瘤中的应用:模型化与实测边界条件的影响。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2011 Feb;39(2):884-96. doi: 10.1007/s10439-010-0187-z. Epub 2010 Oct 23.
6
The Computational Fluid Dynamics Rupture Challenge 2013--Phase II: Variability of Hemodynamic Simulations in Two Intracranial Aneurysms.2013年计算流体动力学破裂挑战赛——第二阶段:两个颅内动脉瘤血流动力学模拟的变异性
J Biomech Eng. 2015 Dec;137(12):121008. doi: 10.1115/1.4031794.
7
Patient-specific hemodynamic analysis of small internal carotid artery-ophthalmic artery aneurysms.小型颈内动脉-眼动脉动脉瘤的个体化血流动力学分析
Surg Neurol. 2009 Nov;72(5):444-50; discussion 450. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2008.12.013. Epub 2009 Mar 29.
8
Is Accurate Lumen Segmentation More Important than Outlet Boundary Condition in Image-Based Blood Flow Simulations for Intracranial Aneurysms?基于影像的颅内动脉瘤血流模拟中,管腔准确分割是否比出口边界条件更重要?
Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2023 Oct;14(5):617-630. doi: 10.1007/s13239-023-00675-1. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
9
Uncertainty quantification of wall shear stress in intracranial aneurysms using a data-driven statistical model of systemic blood flow variability.使用基于数据驱动的全身血流变异性统计模型对颅内动脉瘤壁面剪应力进行不确定性量化。
J Biomech. 2016 Dec 8;49(16):3815-3823. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
10
Influence of Parent Artery Segmentation and Boundary Conditions on Hemodynamic Characteristics of Intracranial Aneurysms.母动脉分割及边界条件对颅内动脉瘤血流动力学特征的影响
Yonsei Med J. 2015 Sep;56(5):1328-37. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.5.1328.