Raimondo Diego, Ianieri Manuel Maria, Raffone Antonio, Ferla Stefano, Raspollini Arianna, Virgilio Agnese, Govoni Francesca, Pavone Matteo, Neola Daniele, Guida Maurizio, Del Governatore Marco, Scambia Giovanni, Seracchioli Renato
Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna (Drs. Raimondo, Ferla, Raspollini, Virgilio, Govoni, and Seracchioli), Bologna, Italy.
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS (Drs. Ianieri, Pavone, Scambia, and Seracchioli), Rome, Italy.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2024 Aug;31(8):680-687. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2024.05.004. Epub 2024 May 16.
Although surgery is the gold standard treatment for pain refractory to medical management or partial occlusion owing to rectosigmoid endometriosis, surgical resection can be associated with major perioperative complications. From general surgery experience, intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy has shown encouraging results as a feasible, safe, and effective technique in reducing the risk of complications related to intestinal anastomosis after segmental resection. Unfortunately, there are no studies evaluating its role after discoid resection for rectosigmoid endometriosis.
A pilot, multicentric, observational, prospective, cohort study.
Two academic hospitals, from March 1 to December 31, 2022.
We enrolled all consecutive fertile-age patients affected by symptomatic endometriosis scheduled for laparoscopic discoid bowel resection. Inclusion criteria were (1) age between 18 and 50 years, (2) diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis performed by transvaginal ultrasound and/or magnetic resonance imaging, and (3) women scheduled for laparoscopic discoid bowel resection of endometriosis at low risk of segmental resection.
During data analysis, enrolled patients were divided into 2 study groups for comparisons based on whether or not the intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy was performed upon surgeons' discretion after discoid resection for treating endometriosis, in addition to standard integrity tests. Primary outcome was the rate of intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy success. Secondary study outcomes were the differences between the intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy group and the nonintraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy group in (1) mean of total operative time and (2) rate of perioperative complications.
A total of 28 patients were enrolled and equally distributed in the 2 groups. The rate of intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy success was 86%. No significant difference was reported between the 2 groups in terms of total operative time (p = .1) and intraoperative and postoperative complications (p = .5 and p = 1, respectively), with no surgical complication related to intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy.
Intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy seems as a feasible and non-time-consuming intraoperative procedure in women undergone discoid resection for rectosigmoid endometriosis. Larger studies with longer follow-up period are necessary to confirm our findings and assess clinical benefits over standard procedure.
尽管手术是治疗因直肠乙状结肠子宫内膜异位症导致的药物治疗无效或部分梗阻性疼痛的金标准,但手术切除可能会伴有严重的围手术期并发症。根据普通外科经验,术中直肠乙状结肠镜检查作为一种可行、安全且有效的技术,在降低节段性切除术后肠吻合相关并发症风险方面已显示出令人鼓舞的结果。不幸的是,尚无研究评估其在直肠乙状结肠子宫内膜异位症盘状切除术后的作用。
一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性队列研究。
两家学术医院,时间为2022年3月1日至12月31日。
我们纳入了所有计划进行腹腔镜盘状肠切除的有症状子宫内膜异位症的连续育龄患者。纳入标准为:(1)年龄在18至50岁之间;(2)经阴道超声和/或磁共振成像诊断为直肠乙状结肠子宫内膜异位症;(3)计划进行腹腔镜盘状肠切除且节段性切除风险低的女性。
在数据分析过程中,根据在盘状切除治疗子宫内膜异位症后外科医生是否酌情进行术中直肠乙状结肠镜检查,将纳入患者分为2个研究组进行比较,此外还进行标准完整性测试。主要结局是术中直肠乙状结肠镜检查的成功率。次要研究结局是术中直肠乙状结肠镜检查组与非术中直肠乙状结肠镜检查组在以下方面的差异:(1)总手术时间均值;(2)围手术期并发症发生率。
共纳入28例患者,平均分配到2组。术中直肠乙状结肠镜检查成功率为86%。两组在总手术时间(p = 0.1)以及术中及术后并发症(分别为p = 0.5和p = 1)方面均无显著差异,且无与术中直肠乙状结肠镜检查相关的手术并发症。
对于接受直肠乙状结肠子宫内膜异位症盘状切除的女性,术中直肠乙状结肠镜检查似乎是一种可行且不耗时的术中操作。需要进行更大规模、随访期更长的研究来证实我们的发现,并评估其相较于标准手术的临床益处。