Aung Shine Htet, Nam Ki-Chang
Department of Animal Science and Technology, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Korea.
Department of Zoology, Kyaukse University, Kyaukse 05151, Myanmar.
Food Sci Anim Resour. 2024 Mar;44(2):464-482. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2024.e3. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
This study aimed to determine the effects of humectants on moisture content, water activity, tenderness, color, microbiological analysis, protein denaturation, and oxidation of jerky. A thorough search for papers published in scientific journals that examined the impacts of humectants on jerky was carried out using Web of Science, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Science Direct. Only 14 studies matched inclusion requirements. They were used in the meta-analysis to synthesise quantitative findings. In the current investigation, jerky produced with beef, poultry, goat, or pork was used. The standardised mean difference (SMD) between treatments with humectants and controls was examined to investigate the effects of humectants using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was investigated using meta-regression. A subgroup analysis was carried out for significant factors. Results revealed that the addition of humectants had no significant impact on water activity, pH, fat, ash, CIE L*, or CIE a* (p>0.05). However, humectant addition significantly increased moisture (SMD=1.28, p<0.05), CIE b* (SMD=1.67, p<0.05), and overall acceptability (SMD=1.73, p<0.05). It significantly decreased metmyoglobin (SMD=-0.96, p<0.05), shear force (SMD=-0.84, p<0.05), and protein (SMD=-1.61, p<0.05). However, it was difficult to get a firm conclusion about how humectants affected the myofibrillar fragmentation index, total plate count, and 2-thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances because there were fewer than ten studies. To sum up, the proper use of humectants in jerky demands careful attention to both type and quantity, needing a delicate balancing act with other contributing factors.
本研究旨在确定保湿剂对肉干的水分含量、水分活度、嫩度、颜色、微生物分析、蛋白质变性和氧化的影响。利用科学网、谷歌学术、PubMed和科学直达数据库,对科学期刊上发表的研究保湿剂对肉干影响的论文进行了全面检索。只有14项研究符合纳入要求。它们被用于荟萃分析以综合定量研究结果。在本次调查中,使用牛肉、家禽、山羊或猪肉制作肉干。采用随机效应模型检验使用保湿剂的处理组与对照组之间的标准化平均差(SMD),以研究保湿剂的效果。使用元回归研究异质性。对显著因素进行亚组分析。结果显示,添加保湿剂对水分活度、pH值、脂肪、灰分、CIE L或CIE a没有显著影响(p>0.05)。然而,添加保湿剂显著提高了水分含量(SMD=1.28,p<0.05)、CIE b*(SMD=1.67,p<0.05)和总体可接受性(SMD=1.73,p<0.05)。它显著降低了高铁肌红蛋白(SMD=-0.96,p<0.05)、剪切力(SMD=-0.84,p<0.05)和蛋白质(SMD=-1.61,p<0.05)。然而,由于研究少于十项,很难就保湿剂如何影响肌原纤维破碎指数、总菌数和硫代巴比妥酸反应性物质得出确凿结论。总之,在肉干中正确使用保湿剂需要仔细关注类型和用量,需要与其他影响因素进行微妙的平衡。