Berman Sarah Emma, Lozano Lauren, Kitten Amanda, Lusk Kathleen, Franco-Martinez Crystal, Hopper Stephanie, Prasad Anand
University of the Incarnate Word Feik School of Pharmacy, San Antonio, TX, USA.
University Health System, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Hosp Pharm. 2024 Jun;59(3):288-294. doi: 10.1177/00185787231208962. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
Impella devices are used for mechanical circulatory support in patients with cardiogenic shock or those undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Anticoagulation protocols in this population are not well established and are complicated by concomitant use of purge solutions containing unfractionated heparin (UFH) and intravenous UFH continuous infusion (CI) for systemic anticoagulation. To evaluate thrombotic and bleeding complications when using a novel UFH protocol with a reduced initial UFH CI dose of 6 units/kg/hour targeting an anti-Xa goal of 0.3 to 0.5 units/mL in patients receiving Impella support. This single-center, retrospective study included 41 patients on Impella support who received an UFH purge solution and/or an IV UFH infusion. The primary outcome was overall composite bleeding. Secondary outcomes included thrombotic events and systemic UFH exposure. An exploratory analysis was performed to identify risk factors for bleeding. Anti-Xa values were in therapeutic range 46% of the time while on support (interquartile range 16.6%-75%), with a median IV UFH dose of 6 units/kg/hour. The overall bleeding rate was 29.2%, with 6 minor bleeds and 2 major bleeds with no fatal bleeding or intracranial hemorrhage. Rate of overall thrombosis was 4.9%, including 1 ischemic stroke and 1 occurrence of limb ischemia. Use of a modified UFH protocol to target an anti-Xa goal of 0.3 to 0.5 units/mL resulted in bleeding and thrombotic event rates similar to previous literature. This protocol utilizing an initial rate of 6 units/kg/hour may be a useful approach to achieve therapeutic anticoagulation while accounting for UFH exposure from the purge solution and minimizing need for frequent calculations.
Impella设备用于心源性休克患者或接受高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者的机械循环支持。该人群的抗凝方案尚未完善,且因同时使用含普通肝素(UFH)的冲洗液和静脉持续输注(CI)UFH进行全身抗凝而变得复杂。为了评估在接受Impella支持的患者中使用新型UFH方案(初始UFH CI剂量降低至6单位/千克/小时,目标抗Xa水平为0.3至0.5单位/毫升)时的血栓形成和出血并发症。这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了41例接受Impella支持并接受UFH冲洗液和/或静脉UFH输注的患者。主要结局是总体综合出血。次要结局包括血栓形成事件和全身UFH暴露。进行了探索性分析以确定出血的危险因素。在支持期间,抗Xa值有46%的时间处于治疗范围内(四分位间距为16.6%-75%),静脉UFH剂量中位数为6单位/千克/小时。总体出血率为29.2%,有6例轻微出血和2例严重出血,无致命性出血或颅内出血。总体血栓形成率为4.9%,包括1例缺血性中风和1例肢体缺血事件。使用改良的UFH方案将抗Xa目标设定为0.3至0.5单位/毫升,导致出血和血栓形成事件发生率与先前文献相似。这种初始速率为6单位/千克/小时的方案可能是一种有用的方法,可在考虑冲洗液中UFH暴露的同时实现治疗性抗凝,并尽量减少频繁计算的需求。