Yuan Ruimei, Xu Min, Hu Chunhai, Ma Huailing, Meng Fanjun, Ren Jie, Wen Jing
Department of Anesthesiology, Jinan Central Hospital, Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Department of Endocrinology, Jinan Central Hospital, Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 May 3;11:1352918. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1352918. eCollection 2024.
The hemodynamic effects of withholding vs. continuing angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) before surgery in elderly patients undergoing spinal surgery in a prone position during anesthesia induction to skin incision are still unknown.
In this prospective study, 80 patients undergoing spinal surgery in a prone position with general anesthesia, aged 60-79 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) II or III, were enrolled. Patients who had ARBs only in their preoperative medication list were randomly divided into two groups at a 1:1 ratio: In Group A, ARBs were continued on the morning of surgery, while in Group B, they were withhold. Norepinephrine was infused to maintain the blood pressure at the baseline level of ±20% during anesthesia induction in all patients. The primary outcome was the consumption of norepinephrine in each group from anesthesia induction to skin incision. The secondary outcomes include changes in invasive arterial blood pressure and heart rate, the fluid infusion volumes, the amounts of anesthetic drugs, and the total time from induction to skin incision.
There were no significant differences in the demographics, the fluid infusion volumes, the amounts of anesthetic drugs, the total time from induction to skin incision, and hemodynamics at different time points ( > 0.05), while significant differences were found in norepinephrine consumption between the two groups ( < 0.001). Compared with Group B, the consumption of norepinephrine increased significantly in Group A (93.3 ± 29.8 vs. 124.1 ± 38.7 μg, = 0.000). In addition, the same trend was illustrated in the pumping rate of norepinephrine between Group B (0.04 ± 0.01 μg·kg·min) and Group A (0.06 ± 0.02 μg·kg·min) ( = 0.004).
Our study conducted in elderly patients with hypotension undergoing prone spinal surgery demonstrated a greater pumping rate of norepinephrine during anesthesia induction in patients with ARBs continuing before surgery than those withholding, indicating that it was more difficult to maintain hemodynamic stability.: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=141081, ChiCTR2100053583.
在麻醉诱导至皮肤切开期间接受俯卧位脊柱手术的老年患者中,术前停用与继续使用血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARB)的血流动力学效应尚不清楚。
在这项前瞻性研究中,纳入了80例年龄在60 - 79岁、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为II或III级、接受全身麻醉的俯卧位脊柱手术患者。术前用药清单中仅使用ARB的患者按1:1比例随机分为两组:A组在手术当天早晨继续使用ARB,而B组则停用。在所有患者麻醉诱导期间输注去甲肾上腺素以将血压维持在基线水平±20%。主要结局是每组从麻醉诱导至皮肤切开期间去甲肾上腺素的消耗量。次要结局包括有创动脉血压和心率的变化、液体输注量、麻醉药物用量以及从诱导至皮肤切开的总时间。
两组在人口统计学、液体输注量、麻醉药物用量、从诱导至皮肤切开的总时间以及不同时间点的血流动力学方面均无显著差异(>0.05),而两组间去甲肾上腺素消耗量存在显著差异(<0.001)。与B组相比,A组去甲肾上腺素消耗量显著增加(93.3±29.8 vs. 124.1±38.7μg,=0.000)。此外,B组(0.04±0.01μg·kg·min)和A组(0.06±0.02μg·kg·min)之间去甲肾上腺素的泵注速率也呈现相同趋势(=0.004)。
我们在接受俯卧位脊柱手术的老年低血压患者中进行的研究表明,术前继续使用ARB的患者在麻醉诱导期间去甲肾上腺素的泵注速率高于停用ARB的患者,这表明维持血流动力学稳定性更困难。:https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=141081,ChiCTR2100053583