Suppr超能文献

检测外生殖器淋病奈瑟菌和沙眼衣原体:家庭用咽和直肠自我采样与在医疗机构完成的采样相比无差异。

Testing for extragenital Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis: At-home pharyngeal and rectal self-swabs are non-inferior to those completed in healthcare settings.

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Sexual Health Clinic, Ottawa Public Health, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 May 20;19(5):e0302785. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302785. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The rates of gonorrhea and chlamydia have been increasing in the years preceding the COVID19 pandemic. Because most gonorrhea and chlamydia infections are located in the oropharynx and rectum for men who have sex with men (MSM), and because at-home self-collected swabs for these infections are not licensed by Health Canada or the United States Food and Drug Administration, decreased accessed to in-person care during and since the COVID19 pandemic potentially means missed case findings.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the performance of at-home self-collected pharyngeal and rectal swabs for gonorrhea and chlamydia nucleic acid amplification testing.

METHODOLOGY

All persons who contacted our Sexual Health Clinic and who had a clinical indication to complete oral and/or rectal swabs for gonorrhea and chlamydia were invited to complete at-home swabs in advance of their scheduled appointments. We mailed swabs and instructions to those who consented. Participants brought these swabs to their scheduled in clinic appointments, where we repeated the same swabs. All matching swabs were sent to the laboratory for analysis to determine concordance.

RESULTS

From September 8, 2022 to July 18, 2023, we enrolled 296 eligible participants who provided 1184 swabs. For analysis, cancelled specimens and specimens with invalid results were excluded, leaving 1032 swabs for comparison. We identified 66 STI diagnoses in 47 unique participants. Overall accuracy was high (exceeding 99%), except for rectal chlamydia, which was 96.0%. While the performance of self-swabs for chlamydia was lower compared to gonorrhea, at-home swabs identified six chlamydia infections that were missed by in-clinic collected swabs (two pharyngeal, four rectal). Removing these six cases as "false positives" increased overall accuracy for chlamydia detection to 99.7% (pharyngeal) and 97.8% (rectal).

CONCLUSION

Self-collected at-home swabs had good performance acceptable for gonorrhea and chlamydia nucleic acid amplification testing.

摘要

简介

在 COVID19 大流行之前的几年中,淋病和衣原体的发病率一直在上升。由于大多数淋病和衣原体感染位于男男性接触者(MSM)的咽喉和直肠,并且由于这些感染的家庭自我采集拭子未经加拿大卫生部或美国食品和药物管理局许可,因此在 COVID19 大流行期间和之后,人们减少了对面对面护理的访问,这可能意味着错过了病例发现。

目的

评估家庭自我采集的咽喉和直肠拭子进行淋病和衣原体核酸扩增检测的性能。

方法

所有联系我们性健康诊所并有临床指征完成淋病和衣原体口腔和/或直肠拭子的人都被邀请在预约前完成家庭自我采集拭子。我们向同意的人邮寄拭子和说明。参与者将这些拭子带到他们计划的诊所预约,我们在那里重复相同的拭子。所有匹配的拭子都被送到实验室进行分析以确定一致性。

结果

从 2022 年 9 月 8 日至 2023 年 7 月 18 日,我们招募了 296 名符合条件的参与者,他们提供了 1184 个拭子。在分析中,排除了取消的标本和无效结果的标本,留下 1032 个标本进行比较。我们在 47 名独特的参与者中发现了 66 例性传播感染诊断。总体准确率很高(超过 99%),除了直肠衣原体,准确率为 96.0%。虽然自我采集的拭子对衣原体的检测性能低于淋病,但家庭自我采集的拭子检测出了 6 例由诊所采集的拭子漏诊的衣原体感染(2 例咽喉,4 例直肠)。如果将这 6 例作为“假阳性”排除在外,衣原体检测的总体准确率将提高到 99.7%(咽喉)和 97.8%(直肠)。

结论

自我采集的家庭自我采集拭子在淋病和衣原体核酸扩增检测方面具有良好的性能,可接受。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a477/11104600/97b287c03313/pone.0302785.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验