Miyake Y, Yagasaki K, Ichikawa H
Arch Ophthalmol. 1985 Oct;103(10):1496-501. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1985.01050100072022.
To determine whether congenital tritanopia and dominantly inherited juvenile optic atrophy (DIJOA) are the same clinical entity, we used electroretinograms of the blue-sensitive cone system (blue cone ERGs), comparing those of two patients with congenital tritanopia from two pedigrees with those of four patients with DIJOA from two pedigrees. The examinations also included visual acuity and visual field tests, fundus examination, the dark-adaptation test, and several color vision tests. The blue cone ERG confirmed a difference between the two groups; it was unrecordable in the patients with congenital tritanopia but within the normal range in those with DIJOA. We believe that congenital tritanopia and DIJOA are distinct disease entities and that the blue cone ERG is a key factor in the differential diagnosis.
为了确定先天性蓝色色盲和显性遗传性青少年视神经萎缩(DIJOA)是否为同一临床实体,我们使用了对蓝色敏感视锥系统的视网膜电图(蓝视锥细胞视网膜电图),将来自两个家系的两名先天性蓝色色盲患者的视网膜电图与来自两个家系的四名DIJOA患者的视网膜电图进行了比较。检查还包括视力和视野测试、眼底检查、暗适应测试以及多项色觉测试。蓝视锥细胞视网膜电图证实了两组之间的差异;先天性蓝色色盲患者的该视网膜电图无法记录,但DIJOA患者的则在正常范围内。我们认为先天性蓝色色盲和DIJOA是不同的疾病实体,并且蓝视锥细胞视网膜电图是鉴别诊断的关键因素。