Suppr超能文献

癌症护理中的性取向和性别认同数据收集:全国范围景观评估更新。

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Collection in Cancer Care: A Nationwide Landscape Assessment Update.

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.

出版信息

JCO Oncol Pract. 2024 Sep;20(9):1272-1279. doi: 10.1200/OP.23.00724. Epub 2024 May 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Routine collection of sexual orientation (SO) and gender identity (GI; collectively SOGI) in cancer clinics advances cancer care equity.

METHODS

In 2022, NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) practice groups were asked about routine collection of SOGI data in the electronic health record. The proportions of practice groups reporting collection of SO and/or GI data were calculated, and practice group characteristics were assessed for associations.

RESULTS

Of 271 practice groups nationwide, 42% (n = 112) collect SO data, 58% (n = 157) collect GI data, and 35% (n = 96) collect both. In multivariate analyses, SO data collection was associated with practice groups having minority outreach staff (odds ratio [OR], 2.07 [95% CI, 1.12 to 3.81]; = .02); GI data collection was associated with practice groups located in the Northeastern United States (OR, 2.08 [95% CI, 0.73 to 5.91]; = .045), and those with a higher proportion of new patients who were White (OR, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.04]; < .001). Practice groups in the South were least likely to collect SOGI data (OR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.26 to 0.94]; = .004). There were no statistically significant differences in SO and/or GI collection on the basis of the practice group's proportion of Medicaid/Medicare patients, number of new patients with cancer per year, or practice ownership.

CONCLUSION

Slightly over one third of NCORP practice groups report routinely collecting SOGI data. There are regional differences in data collection, underscoring the need to craft targeted, region-specific interventions focused on boosting the capture and recording of SOGI data in an affirming manner.

摘要

目的

在癌症诊所常规收集性取向 (SO) 和性别认同 (GI; 统称为 SOGI) 可促进癌症护理公平。

方法

2022 年,NCI 社区肿瘤学研究计划 (NCORP) 实践小组被问及在电子健康记录中常规收集 SOGI 数据的情况。计算报告收集 SO 和/或 GI 数据的实践小组的比例,并评估实践小组的特征与关联。

结果

在全国 271 个实践小组中,42%(n=112)收集 SO 数据,58%(n=157)收集 GI 数据,35%(n=96)同时收集 SO 和 GI 数据。在多变量分析中,SO 数据收集与实践小组有少数民族外联工作人员相关(优势比 [OR],2.07 [95%CI,1.12 至 3.81]; =.02);GI 数据收集与位于美国东北部的实践小组相关(OR,2.08 [95%CI,0.73 至 5.91]; =.045),以及新患者中白人比例较高的实践小组相关(OR,1.02 [95%CI,1.01 至 1.04]; <.001)。南部的实践小组最不可能收集 SOGI 数据(OR,0.49 [95%CI,0.26 至 0.94]; =.004)。根据实践小组 Medicaid/Medicare 患者比例、每年新癌症患者数量或实践所有权,SO 和/或 GI 的收集没有统计学上的显著差异。

结论

略超过三分之一的 NCORP 实践小组报告常规收集 SOGI 数据。数据收集存在地区差异,这突显了需要制定有针对性的、针对特定地区的干预措施,重点以肯定的方式加强 SOGI 数据的捕获和记录。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验