Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (R.C., A.A., S.S., T.D., L.W., I.I.).
Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (E.H.).
Ann Intern Med. 2024 Jul;177(7):929-940. doi: 10.7326/M24-0677. Epub 2024 May 21.
Definitions of long COVID are evolving, and optimal models of care are uncertain.
To perform a scoping review on definitions of long COVID and provide an overview of care models, including a proposed framework to describe and distinguish models.
English-language articles from Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Library, SocINDEX, Scopus, Embase, and CINAHL published between January 2021 and November 2023; gray literature; and discussions with 18 key informants.
Publications describing long COVID definitions or models of care, supplemented by models described by key informants.
Data were extracted by one reviewer and verified for accuracy by another reviewer.
Of 1960 screened citations, 38 were included. Five clinical definitions of long COVID varied with regard to timing since symptom onset and the minimum duration required for diagnosis; 1 additional definition was symptom score-based. Forty-nine long COVID care models were informed by 5 key principles: a core "lead" team, multidisciplinary expertise, comprehensive access to diagnostic and therapeutic services, a patient-centered approach, and providing capacity to meet demand. Seven characteristics provided a framework for distinguishing models: home department or clinical setting, clinical lead, collocation of other specialties, primary care role, population managed, use of teleservices, and whether the model was practice- or systems-based. Using this framework, 10 representative practice-based and 3 systems-based models of care were identified.
Published literature often lacked key model details, data were insufficient to assess model outcomes, and there was overlap between and variability within models.
Definitions of long COVID and care models are evolving. Research is needed to optimize models and evaluate outcomes of different models.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (Protocol posted at https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/long-covid-models-care/protocol.).
长新冠的定义正在不断发展,最佳的护理模式也不确定。
对长新冠的定义进行范围综述,并提供护理模式概述,包括描述和区分模型的拟议框架。
2021 年 1 月至 2023 年 11 月期间,Ovid MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Cochrane 图书馆、SocINDEX、Scopus、Embase 和 CINAHL 等数据库中的英文文章、灰色文献以及与 18 名关键知情人的讨论。
描述长新冠定义或护理模式的出版物,辅之以关键知情人描述的模型。
由一名评审员提取数据,另一名评审员验证数据的准确性。
在 1960 篇筛选文献中,有 38 篇被纳入。5 种长新冠的临床定义在症状出现后时间和诊断所需的最短时间方面存在差异;还有 1 种定义是基于症状评分的。49 种长新冠护理模式由 5 个关键原则为依据:核心“领导”团队、多学科专业知识、全面获得诊断和治疗服务、以患者为中心的方法以及提供满足需求的能力。7 个特征为区分模型提供了框架:家庭部门或临床环境、临床领导、其他专业的配置、初级保健角色、管理人群、远程服务的使用以及该模型是基于实践还是基于系统。使用该框架,确定了 10 种具有代表性的实践基础和 3 种基于系统的护理模型。
发表的文献往往缺乏关键模型细节,数据不足以评估模型结果,并且模型之间存在重叠和差异。
长新冠的定义和护理模式正在不断发展。需要研究来优化模型并评估不同模型的结果。
美国医疗保健研究与质量局。(方案发布于 https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/long-covid-models-care/protocol/。)