• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索严重哮喘对生物制剂反应的定义和预测因素。

Exploring Definitions and Predictors of Response to Biologics for Severe Asthma.

机构信息

Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore; Optimum Patient Care Global, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Md.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024 Sep;12(9):2347-2361. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.05.016. Epub 2024 May 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaip.2024.05.016
PMID:38768896
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Biologic effectiveness is often assessed as response, a term that eludes consistent definition. Identifying those most likely to respond in real-life has proven challenging.

OBJECTIVE

To explore definitions of biologic responders in adults with severe asthma and investigate patient characteristics associated with biologic response.

METHODS

This was a longitudinal cohort study using data from 21 countries, which shared data with the International Severe Asthma Registry. Changes in four asthma outcome domains were assessed in the 1-year period before and after biologic initiation in patients with a predefined level of prebiologic impairment. Responder cutoffs were 50% or greater reduction in exacerbation rate, 50% or greater reduction in long-term oral corticosteroid daily dose, improvement in one or more category in asthma control, and 100 mL or greater improvement in FEV. Responders were defined using single and multiple domains. The association between prebiologic characteristics and postbiologic initiation response was examined by multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 2,210 patients were included. Responder rate ranged from 80.7% (n = 566 of 701) for exacerbation response to 10.6% (n = 9 of 85) for a four-domain response. Many responders still exhibited significant impairment after biologic initiation: 46.7% (n = 206 of 441) of asthma control responders with uncontrolled asthma before the biologic still had incompletely controlled disease postbiologic initiation. Predictors of response were outcome-dependent. Lung function responders were more likely to have higher prebiologic FeNO (odds ratio = 1.20 for every 25-parts per billion increase), and shorter asthma duration (odds ratio = 0.81 for every 10-year increase in duration). Higher blood eosinophil count and the presence of type 2-related comorbidities were positively associated with higher odds of meeting long-term oral corticosteroid, control, and lung function responder criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings underscore the multimodal nature of response, showing that many responders experience residual symptoms after biologic initiation and that predictors of response vary according to the outcome assessed.

摘要

背景

生物疗效通常评估为反应,而这个术语的定义并不一致。在现实生活中确定哪些患者最有可能产生反应已被证明具有挑战性。

目的

探讨成人严重哮喘中生物应答者的定义,并研究与生物应答相关的患者特征。

方法

这是一项使用来自 21 个国家的数据进行的纵向队列研究,这些国家与国际严重哮喘登记处共享数据。在生物制剂治疗前,评估了具有预先设定的生物制剂治疗前损伤水平的患者在 1 年内四个哮喘结局领域的变化。应答者的截止值为:发作率降低 50%或以上、长期口服皮质类固醇日剂量降低 50%或以上、一个或多个哮喘控制类别改善以及 FEV 改善 100 mL 或以上。使用单一和多个领域定义应答者。通过多变量分析检查了生物制剂治疗前特征与生物制剂治疗后反应之间的关系。

结果

共纳入 2210 例患者。应答率范围为:发作应答率为 80.7%(n=701 例中的 566 例),四领域应答率为 10.6%(n=85 例中的 9 例)。许多应答者在接受生物制剂治疗后仍存在显著的损伤:在接受生物制剂治疗前哮喘控制不良的 206 例(n=441 例中的 206 例)哮喘控制应答者中,仍有不完全控制的疾病。反应的预测因素取决于结局。肺功能应答者更有可能有较高的生物制剂前 FeNO(每增加 25 个部分每十亿增加的比值比为 1.20),以及较短的哮喘持续时间(每增加 10 年持续时间的比值比为 0.81)。更高的血嗜酸性粒细胞计数和存在 2 型相关合并症与更高的满足长期口服皮质类固醇、控制和肺功能应答标准的几率呈正相关。

结论

我们的研究结果强调了反应的多模态性质,表明许多应答者在接受生物制剂治疗后仍有残留症状,而且反应的预测因素根据评估的结局而有所不同。

相似文献

1
Exploring Definitions and Predictors of Response to Biologics for Severe Asthma.探索严重哮喘对生物制剂反应的定义和预测因素。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024 Sep;12(9):2347-2361. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.05.016. Epub 2024 May 19.
2
Exploring Definitions and Predictors of Severe Asthma Clinical Remission after Biologic Treatment in Adults.探索成人接受生物治疗后重度哮喘临床缓解的定义和预测因素。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Oct 1;210(7):869-880. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202311-2192OC.
3
Association between pre-biologic T2-biomarker combinations and response to biologics in patients with severe asthma.严重哮喘患者中 T2 生物标志物组合与生物制剂应答之间的关联。
Front Immunol. 2024 Apr 19;15:1361891. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1361891. eCollection 2024.
4
Impact of pre-biologic impairment on meeting domain-specific biologic responder definitions in patients with severe asthma.在严重哮喘患者中,预先存在的生物标志物异常对符合特定生物标志物应答定义的影响。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2024 May;132(5):610-622.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.12.023. Epub 2023 Dec 25.
5
Real-world biologics response and super-response in the International Severe Asthma Registry cohort.真实世界生物制剂应答和超应答在国际严重哮喘注册研究队列中的表现。
Allergy. 2024 Oct;79(10):2700-2716. doi: 10.1111/all.16178. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
6
Comparative effectiveness of anti-IL5 and anti-IgE biologic classes in patients with severe asthma eligible for both.适合接受两种药物治疗的重度哮喘患者中抗白细胞介素 5 类和抗免疫球蛋白 E 类生物制剂的疗效比较。
Allergy. 2023 Jul;78(7):1934-1948. doi: 10.1111/all.15711. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
7
Asthma biologics: Real-world effectiveness, impact of switching biologics, and predictors of response.哮喘生物制剂:真实世界的疗效、生物制剂转换的影响以及反应的预测因素。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021 Dec;127(6):655-660.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.08.416. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
8
Comparison of Long-term Response and Remission to Omalizumab and Anti-IL-5/IL-5R Using Different Criteria in a Real-life Cohort of Severe Asthma Patients.在重度哮喘患者的真实队列中,使用不同标准比较奥马珠单抗和抗IL-5/IL-5R的长期反应与缓解情况。
Arch Bronconeumol. 2024 Jan;60(1):23-32. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2023.11.011. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
9
Impact of Initiating Biologics in Patients With Severe Asthma on Long-Term Oral Corticosteroids or Frequent Rescue Steroids (GLITTER): Data From the International Severe Asthma Registry.严重哮喘患者起始使用生物制剂对长期口服皮质类固醇或频繁使用急救皮质类固醇的影响(GLITTER):来自国际严重哮喘登记处的数据。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Sep;11(9):2732-2747. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.05.044. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
10
Omalizumab as alternative to chronic use of oral corticosteroids in severe asthma.奥马珠单抗可作为严重哮喘中慢性口服皮质类固醇替代疗法。
Respir Med. 2019 Apr;150:51-62. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Biomarkers of type 2 inflammation as predictors of response to biologics for severe eosinophilic asthma.2型炎症生物标志物作为重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘生物制剂反应的预测指标
ERJ Open Res. 2025 Aug 26;11(4). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00969-2024. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Baseline type 2 biomarker levels and clinical remission predictors in children with asthma.哮喘患儿的基线2型生物标志物水平及临床缓解预测因素
Front Immunol. 2025 May 28;16:1492644. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1492644. eCollection 2025.
3
Real-World Biologic Use Patterns in Severe Asthma, 2015-2021: The CLEAR Study.
2015 - 2021年重度哮喘的真实世界生物制剂使用模式:CLEAR研究
Pragmat Obs Res. 2025 Mar 18;16:51-66. doi: 10.2147/POR.S497033. eCollection 2025.
4
Reply to: Response and remission in asthma with tezepelumab: overlapping concepts informing on type-2 inflammatory-dependent treatment effects.回复:使用tezepelumab治疗哮喘的反应与缓解:关于2型炎症依赖性治疗效果的重叠概念
Eur Respir J. 2025 Feb 13;65(2). doi: 10.1183/13993003.02434-2024. Print 2025 Feb.
5
International Severe Asthma Registry (ISAR): 2017-2024 Status and Progress Update.国际重症哮喘注册研究(ISAR):2017 - 2024年现状与进展更新
Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2025 Apr;88(2):193-215. doi: 10.4046/trd.2024.0198. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
6
Clinical response and on-treatment clinical remission with tezepelumab in a broad population of patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma: results over 2 years from the NAVIGATOR and DESTINATION studies.在广泛的重度难治性哮喘患者群体中使用tezepelumab的临床反应及治疗期间的临床缓解情况:NAVIGATOR和DESTINATION研究的2年结果
Eur Respir J. 2024 Dec 5;64(6). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00316-2024. Print 2024 Dec.