• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经验性美罗培南与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗脓毒症成年患者的比较(EMPRESS)试验:方案。

Empirical meropenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam for adult patients with sepsis (EMPRESS) trial: Protocol.

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Collaboration for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC), Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2024 Sep;68(8):1107-1119. doi: 10.1111/aas.14441. Epub 2024 May 20.

DOI:10.1111/aas.14441
PMID:38769040
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Piperacillin/tazobactam may be associated with less favourable outcomes than carbapenems in patients with severe bacterial infections, but the certainty of evidence is low.

METHODS

The Empirical Meropenem versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam for Adult Patients with Sepsis (EMPRESS) trial is an investigator-initiated, international, parallel-group, randomised, open-label, adaptive clinical trial with an integrated feasibility phase. We will randomise adult, critically ill patients with sepsis to empirical treatment with meropenem or piperacillin/tazobactam for up to 30 days. The primary outcome is 30-day all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes are serious adverse reactions within 30 days; isolation precautions due to resistant bacteria within 30 days; days alive without life support and days alive and out of hospital within 30 and 90 days; 90- and 180-day all-cause mortality and 180-day health-related quality of life. EMPRESS will use Bayesian statistical models with weak to somewhat sceptical neutral priors. Adaptive analyses will be conducted after follow-up of the primary outcome for the first 400 participants concludes and after every 300 subsequent participants, with adaptive stopping for superiority/inferiority and practical equivalence (absolute risk difference <2.5%-points) and response-adaptive randomisation. The expected sample sizes in scenarios with no, small or large differences are 5189, 5859 and 2570 participants, with maximum 14,000 participants and ≥99% probability of conclusiveness across all scenarios.

CONCLUSIONS

EMPRESS will compare the effects of empirical meropenem against piperacillin/tazobactam in adult, critically ill patients with sepsis. Due to the pragmatic, adaptive design with high probability of conclusiveness, the trial results are expected to directly inform clinical practice.

摘要

背景

在患有严重细菌感染的患者中,比阿培南/他唑巴坦与较差的结局相关,但其证据确定性低。

方法

经验性美罗培南与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗成人脓毒症患者(EMPRESS)试验是一项由研究者发起的、国际、平行组、随机、开放标签、适应性临床试验,具有集成可行性阶段。我们将随机分配成年、危重病患者接受经验性治疗,用美罗培南或哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗,时间长达 30 天。主要结局为 30 天全因死亡率。次要结局为 30 天内的严重不良反应;30 天内因耐药菌而采取隔离预防措施;30 天和 90 天内无生命支持和存活出院天数;30、90 和 180 天全因死亡率和 180 天健康相关生活质量。EMPRESS 将使用贝叶斯统计模型,带有弱到适度怀疑的中性先验。在对前 400 名参与者的主要结局进行随访后,以及每 300 名后续参与者后,将进行适应性分析,用于优势/劣势和实际等效性(绝对风险差异<2.5 个百分点)和反应适应性随机化的适应性停止。在无差异、小差异或大差异情况下的预期样本量分别为 5189、5859 和 2570 名参与者,最大样本量为 14000 名参与者,在所有情况下均有≥99%的结论可能性。

结论

EMPRESS 将比较经验性美罗培南与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦在成人、危重病脓毒症患者中的疗效。由于具有高结论可能性的实用、适应性设计,试验结果有望直接为临床实践提供信息。

相似文献

1
Empirical meropenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam for adult patients with sepsis (EMPRESS) trial: Protocol.经验性美罗培南与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗脓毒症成年患者的比较(EMPRESS)试验:方案。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2024 Sep;68(8):1107-1119. doi: 10.1111/aas.14441. Epub 2024 May 20.
2
A protocol for a phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial of continuous versus intermittent β-lactam antibiotic infusion in critically ill patients with sepsis: BLING III.一项关于脓毒症重症患者连续与间歇β-内酰胺类抗生素输注的3期多中心随机对照试验方案:BLING III
Crit Care Resusc. 2019 Mar;21(1):63-68.
3
Piperacillin/tazobactam versus carbapenems in patients with severe bacterial infections: A systematic review with meta-analysis.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与碳青霉烯类药物治疗严重细菌感染患者的疗效比较:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2023 Aug;67(7):853-868. doi: 10.1111/aas.14239. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
4
Empirical carbapenems or piperacillin/tazobactam for infections in intensive care: An international retrospective cohort study.经验性使用碳青霉烯类药物或哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗重症监护病房感染:一项国际回顾性队列研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2024 Jul;68(6):821-829. doi: 10.1111/aas.14419. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
5
Piperacillin-tazobactam versus meropenem for treatment of bloodstream infections caused by third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: a study protocol for a non-inferiority open-label randomised controlled trial (PeterPen).哌拉西林-他唑巴坦与美罗培南治疗对第三代头孢菌素耐药的肠杆菌科细菌引起的血流感染:一项非劣效性开放标签随机对照试验(PeterPen)的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 8;11(2):e040210. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040210.
6
Effect of Piperacillin-Tazobactam vs Meropenem on 30-Day Mortality for Patients With E coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Infection and Ceftriaxone Resistance: A Randomized Clinical Trial.哌拉西林-他唑巴坦与美罗培南对产 ESBLs 的大肠埃希菌或肺炎克雷伯菌血流感染且对头孢曲松耐药患者 30 天死亡率的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2018 Sep 11;320(10):984-994. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.12163.
7
Early switch from intravenous to oral antibiotic therapy in patients with cancer who have low-risk neutropenic sepsis (the EASI-SWITCH trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.癌症合并低危中性粒细胞减少症脓毒症患者早期静脉转口服抗生素治疗(EASI-SWITCH 试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 May 27;21(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04241-1.
8
Therapeutic drug monitoring-based dose optimisation of piperacillin/tazobactam to improve outcome in patients with sepsis (TARGET): a prospective, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial.基于治疗药物监测的哌拉西林/他唑巴坦剂量优化以改善脓毒症患者结局(TARGET):一项前瞻性、多中心、随机对照试验。
Trials. 2019 Jun 6;20(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3437-x.
9
Mortality of Patients With Sepsis Administered Piperacillin-Tazobactam vs Cefepime.哌拉西林他唑巴坦与头孢吡肟治疗脓毒症患者的死亡率。
JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Jul 1;184(7):769-777. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0581.
10
Ceftolozane-tazobactam versus meropenem for definitive treatment of bloodstream infection due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) and AmpC-producing Enterobacterales ("MERINO-3"): study protocol for a multicentre, open-label randomised non-inferiority trial.头孢洛扎他唑巴坦与美罗培南治疗产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)和 AmpC 酶肠杆菌科细菌血流感染的比较(MERINO-3):一项多中心、开放标签、随机非劣效性临床试验方案。
Trials. 2021 Apr 22;22(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05206-8.

引用本文的文献

1
INCEPT: The Intensive Care Platform Trial-Design and protocol.INCEPT:重症监护平台试验——设计与方案
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025 Apr;69(4):e70023. doi: 10.1111/aas.70023.