• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

INCEPT:重症监护平台试验——设计与方案

INCEPT: The Intensive Care Platform Trial-Design and protocol.

作者信息

Granholm Anders, Møller Morten Hylander, Kaas-Hansen Benjamin Skov, Jensen Aksel Karl Georg, Munch Marie Warrer, Kjær Maj-Brit Nørregaard, Andersen Lars Wiuff, Schjørring Olav Lilleholt, Rasmussen Bodil Steen, Meyhoff Tine Sylvest, Larsen Rikke Faebo, Thorsen-Meyer Hans-Christian, Collet Marie Oxenbøll, Meier Nick Frørup, Estrup Stine, Mathiesen Ole, Maagaard Mathias, Poulsen Lone Musaeus, Strøm Thomas, Christensen Steffen, Bruun Camilla Rahbek Lysholm, Keus Frederik, Rossing Peter, Granfeldt Asger, Brøchner Anne Craveiro, Itenov Theis Skovsgaard, Cronhjort Maria, Laake Jon Henrik, Hästbacka Johanna, Pfortmueller Carmen Andrea, Siegemund Martin, Sigurdsson Martin Ingi, Andersen Lars Peter Kloster, Placido Davide, Lange Theis, Perner Anders

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Section of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025 Apr;69(4):e70023. doi: 10.1111/aas.70023.

DOI:10.1111/aas.70023
PMID:40084471
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11907384/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients receive many interventions, but few are supported by high-certainty evidence. Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) are essential for trustworthy comparisons of intervention effects, but conventional RCTs are costly, cumbersome, inflexible, and often turn out inconclusive. Adaptive platform trials may mitigate these issues and have higher probabilities of obtaining conclusive results faster and at lower costs per participant.

METHODS

The Intensive Care Platform Trial (INCEPT) is an investigator-initiated, pragmatic, randomised, embedded, multifactorial, international, adaptive platform trial including adults acutely admitted to ICUs. INCEPT will assess comparable groups of interventions (primarily commonly used interventions with clinical uncertainty and practice variation) nested in domains. Interventions may be either open-label or masked. New domains will continuously be added to the platform. INCEPT assesses multiple core outcomes selected following substantial stakeholder involvement: mortality, days alive without life support/out of hospital/free of delirium, health-related quality of life, cognitive function, and safety outcomes. Each domain will use one of these core outcomes as the primary outcome. INCEPT primarily uses Bayesian statistical methods with neutral, minimally informative or sceptical priors, adjustment for important prognostic baseline variables, and calculation of absolute and relative differences in the intention-to-treat populations. Domains and intervention arms may be stopped for superiority/inferiority, practical equivalence, or futility according to pre-specified adaptation rules evaluated using statistical simulation or at pre-specified maximum sample sizes. Domains may use response-adaptive randomisation, meaning that more participants will be allocated to interventions with higher probabilities of being superior.

CONCLUSIONS

INCEPT provides an efficient, pragmatic, and flexible platform for comparing the effects of many interventions used in adult ICU patients. The adaptive design enables the trial to use accumulating data to improve the treatment of future participants. INCEPT will provide high-certainty, conclusive evidence for many interventions, directly inform clinical practice, and thus improve patient-important outcomes.

摘要

背景

成人重症监护病房(ICU)患者会接受多种干预措施,但很少有措施得到高确定性证据的支持。随机临床试验(RCT)对于可靠地比较干预效果至关重要,但传统的RCT成本高昂、操作繁琐、缺乏灵活性,而且往往没有定论。适应性平台试验可能会缓解这些问题,并且更有可能以更低的每位参与者成本更快地获得确定性结果。

方法

重症监护平台试验(INCEPT)是一项由研究者发起的、务实的、随机的、嵌入式的、多因素的、国际性的适应性平台试验,纳入急性入住ICU的成人患者。INCEPT将评估嵌套在各个领域中的可比较干预组(主要是存在临床不确定性和实践差异的常用干预措施)。干预措施可以是开放标签或设盲的。新的领域将不断添加到该平台。INCEPT评估在大量利益相关者参与后选定的多个核心结局:死亡率、无生命支持存活天数/出院天数/无谵妄天数、健康相关生活质量、认知功能和安全性结局。每个领域将使用这些核心结局之一作为主要结局。INCEPT主要使用贝叶斯统计方法,采用中性、信息量最少或持怀疑态度的先验概率,对重要的预后基线变量进行调整,并计算意向性治疗人群中的绝对和相对差异。根据使用统计模拟评估的预先指定的适应性规则或在预先指定的最大样本量时,各领域和干预组可能会因优效性/劣效性、实际等效性或无效性而停止。各领域可能会使用反应自适应随机化,这意味着更多参与者将被分配到更有可能具有优效性的干预措施中。

结论

INCEPT为比较成人ICU患者使用的多种干预措施的效果提供了一个高效、务实且灵活的平台。适应性设计使该试验能够利用不断积累的数据来改善对未来参与者的治疗。INCEPT将为多种干预措施提供高确定性、确凿的证据,直接为临床实践提供信息,从而改善对患者至关重要的结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d35a/11907384/3298926f6ee1/AAS-69-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d35a/11907384/3298926f6ee1/AAS-69-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d35a/11907384/3298926f6ee1/AAS-69-0-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
INCEPT: The Intensive Care Platform Trial-Design and protocol.INCEPT:重症监护平台试验——设计与方案
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025 Apr;69(4):e70023. doi: 10.1111/aas.70023.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The UPMC OPTIMISE-C19 (OPtimizing Treatment and Impact of Monoclonal antIbodieS through Evaluation for COVID-19) trial: a structured summary of a study protocol for an open-label, pragmatic, comparative effectiveness platform trial with response-adaptive randomization.UPMC OPTIMISE-C19(通过对COVID-19的评估优化单克隆抗体的治疗及影响)试验:一项开放标签、务实、具有反应适应性随机化的比较有效性平台试验的研究方案结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 May 25;22(1):363. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05316-3.
4
Effect of dexamethasone in patients with ARDS and COVID-19 - prospective, multi-centre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial (REMED trial): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.地塞米松治疗 ARDS 合并 COVID-19 患者的效果 - 一项前瞻性、多中心、开放标签、平行组、随机对照试验(REMED 试验):一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Mar 1;22(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05116-9.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
muLTi-Arm Therapeutic study in pre-ICu patients admitted with Covid-19-Experimental drugs and mechanisms (TACTIC-E): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.多臂治疗研究在 ICU 前因 COVID-19 入院的患者中-实验药物和机制(TACTIC-E):一项随机对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Jul 31;21(1):690. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04618-2.
7
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.
8
Coagulopathy of hospitalised COVID-19: A Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial of Therapeutic Anticoagulation versus Standard Care as a Rapid Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic (RAPID COVID COAG - RAPID Trial): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.住院 COVID-19 患者的凝血病:治疗性抗凝与标准治疗作为对 COVID-19 大流行的快速反应的实用随机对照试验 (RAPID COVID COAG - RAPID 试验):一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Mar 10;22(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05076-0.
9
Norwegian Coronavirus Disease 2019 (NO COVID-19) Pragmatic Open label Study to assess early use of hydroxychloroquine sulphate in moderately severe hospitalised patients with coronavirus disease 2019: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.挪威 2019 年冠状病毒病(NO COVID-19)实用开放性标签研究,评估硫酸羟氯喹在 2019 年冠状病毒病中度重症住院患者中的早期使用:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Jun 5;21(1):485. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04420-0.
10
Empirical meropenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam for adult patients with sepsis (EMPRESS) trial: Protocol.经验性美罗培南与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗脓毒症成年患者的比较(EMPRESS)试验:方案。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2024 Sep;68(8):1107-1119. doi: 10.1111/aas.14441. Epub 2024 May 20.

引用本文的文献

1
The AI and Automation in Anaesthesia (TRIPLE-A) Perioperative Database in Eastern Denmark 2017-: A Platform for Epidemiology, AI-Driven Prediction, Quality Control and Automated Data Retrieval.丹麦东部麻醉领域的人工智能与自动化(TRIPLE - A)围手术期数据库(2017年至今):一个用于流行病学、人工智能驱动预测、质量控制和自动数据检索的平台。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025 Oct;69(9):e70116. doi: 10.1111/aas.70116.
2
A Personal Reflection on the Late Rinaldo Bellomo, One of the Most Prolific Researchers in Intensive Care Medicine.对重症监护医学领域最多产的研究者之一里纳尔多·贝洛莫的个人追思
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025 Aug;69(7):e70097. doi: 10.1111/aas.70097.

本文引用的文献

1
A Core Outcome Set for Adult General ICU Patients.成人综合重症监护病房患者的核心结局集。
Crit Care Med. 2025 Mar 1;53(3):e575-e589. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006556. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
2
Bayesian statistics for clinical research.贝叶斯统计学在临床研究中的应用。
Lancet. 2024 Sep 14;404(10457):1067-1076. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01295-9.
3
Recommendations for clinical trial design in acute kidney injury from the 31st acute disease quality initiative consensus conference. A consensus statement.急性肾损伤临床试验设计的建议来自第 31 届急性疾病质量倡议共识会议。一项共识声明。
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Sep;50(9):1426-1437. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07560-y. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
4
Empirical meropenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam for adult patients with sepsis (EMPRESS) trial: Protocol.经验性美罗培南与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗脓毒症成年患者的比较(EMPRESS)试验:方案。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2024 Sep;68(8):1107-1119. doi: 10.1111/aas.14441. Epub 2024 May 20.
5
Effects of sceptical priors on the performance of adaptive clinical trials with binary outcomes.怀疑先验对二分类结局适应性临床试验性能的影响。
Pharm Stat. 2024 Sep-Oct;23(5):728-741. doi: 10.1002/pst.2387. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
6
The Rise of Adaptive Platform Trials in Critical Care.重症监护中适应性平台试验的兴起。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Mar 1;209(5):491-496. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202401-0101CP.
7
The estimands framework: a primer on the ICH E9(R1) addendum.估计量框架:ICH E9(R1)增编入门指南。
BMJ. 2024 Jan 23;384:e076316. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-076316.
8
Effects of duration of follow-up and lag in data collection on the performance of adaptive clinical trials.随访时间和数据收集滞后对适应性临床试验性能的影响。
Pharm Stat. 2024 Mar-Apr;23(2):138-150. doi: 10.1002/pst.2342. Epub 2023 Oct 14.
9
Response-adaptive randomization in clinical trials: from myths to practical considerations.临床试验中的响应自适应随机化:从误解到实际考量
Stat Sci. 2023 May;38(2):185-208. doi: 10.1214/22-STS865.
10
Use of days alive without life support and similar count outcomes in randomised clinical trials - an overview and comparison of methodological choices and analysis methods.使用有或无生命支持的存活天数和类似的计数结局指标在随机临床试验中的应用——方法学选择和分析方法的概述和比较。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Jun 14;23(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01963-z.