Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Aug;31(8):732-738. doi: 10.1111/acem.14931. Epub 2024 May 20.
Academic emergency medicine (EM) is foundational to the EM specialty through the development of new knowledge and clinical training of resident physicians. Despite recent increased attention to the future of the EM workforce, no evaluations have specifically characterized the U.S. academic EM workforce. We sought to estimate the national proportion of emergency physicians (EPs) identified as academic and the proportion of emergency department (ED) visits that take place at academic sites.
We performed a cross-sectional analysis of EPs and EDs using data from the American Hospital Association, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and Doximity's Residency Navigator. EPs were identified as "academic" if they were affiliated with at least one facility determined to be academic, defined as EDs officially designated by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) as clinical training sites at accredited EM residency programs. Our primary outcomes were to estimate the national proportion of EPs identified as academic and the proportion of ED visits performed at academic sites.
Our analytic sample included 26,937 EPs practicing clinically across 4920 EDs and providing care during 130,471,386 ED visits. Among EPs, 11,720 (43.5%) were identified as academic, and among EDs, 635 (12.9%) were identified as academic sites, including 585 adult/general sites, 45 pediatric-specific sites, and 10 sites affiliated with the Department of Veterans Affairs. In 2021, academic EDs provided care for 42,794,106 ED visits or 32.8% of all ED visits nationally.
Approximately four in 10 EPs practice in at least one clinical training site affiliated with an ACGME-accredited EM residency program, and approximately one in three ED visits nationally occur in these academic EDs. We encourage further work using alternative definitions of an academic EPs and EDs, along with longitudinal research to identify trends in the workforce's composition.
学术急诊医学(EM)通过发展新知识和对住院医师的临床培训,为急诊医学专业奠定了基础。尽管最近人们越来越关注急诊医学劳动力的未来,但尚无评估专门描述美国学术急诊医学劳动力的情况。我们试图估计被确定为学术的急诊医师(EP)在全国的比例,以及在学术场所进行的急诊就诊比例。
我们使用美国医院协会、医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心以及 Doximity 的住院医师导航的数据,对 EP 和 ED 进行了横断面分析。如果 EP 与至少一个被确定为学术的机构有关联,则将其定义为学术机构,这些机构被研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)正式指定为在认可的急诊住院医师培训计划中进行临床培训的 ED。我们的主要结果是估计被确定为学术的 EP 占全国的比例,以及在学术场所进行的 ED 就诊比例。
我们的分析样本包括在 4920 个 ED 中进行临床实践并在 130471386 次 ED 就诊中提供治疗的 26937 名 EP。在 EP 中,有 11720 名(43.5%)被确定为学术,在 ED 中,有 635 名(12.9%)被确定为学术场所,包括 585 个成人/综合站点、45 个儿科特定站点和 10 个与退伍军人事务部有关联的站点。在 2021 年,学术 ED 为 42794106 次 ED 就诊或全国所有 ED 就诊的 32.8%提供了治疗。
大约每 10 名 EP 中就有 4 名至少在一个与 ACGME 认可的急诊住院医师培训计划有关联的临床培训场所工作,全国大约有三分之一的 ED 就诊发生在这些学术 ED 中。我们鼓励使用学术 EP 和 ED 的替代定义以及纵向研究来进一步开展工作,以确定劳动力构成的趋势。