The Hidden Psychometric Model Underlying the : What Happens When It Fails to Fit Psychiatric Data.
作者信息
Morgan-López Antonio A, Saavedra Lissette M, Prakash Krithika, West Stephen G, Hien Denise A
机构信息
RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (Morgan-López, Saavedra); Department of Psychology, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti (Prakash); Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, and Methods and Evaluation Division, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin (West); Center of Alcohol and Substance Use Studies, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey (Hien).
出版信息
Psychiatr Serv. 2024 Sep 1;75(9):937-938. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20230370. Epub 2024 May 21.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The Hidden Psychometric Model Underlying the : What Happens When It Fails to Fit Psychiatric Data.背后隐藏的心理测量模型：当它无法拟合精神科数据时会发生什么。
Psychiatr Serv. 2024 Sep 1;75(9):937-938. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20230370. Epub 2024 May 21.
2
Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire (PDSQ): Psychometric Properties and Item-Level Empirical Correlates.
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2025 Jul-Aug;32(4):e70099. doi: 10.1002/cpp.70099.
3
Age-related Psychometric Dimensionality Using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition Opioid Use Disorder Diagnostic Criteria.使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版阿片类物质使用障碍诊断标准的年龄相关心理测量维度
J Addict Med. 2024;18(6):675-682. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001343. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
4
The rise of normality in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: Causes and implications for diagnosis, practice, and validity.
J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2025 Aug;134(6):603-605. doi: 10.1037/abn0000983. Epub 2025 May 5.
5
Rethinking psychiatric symptoms: the role of measurement heterogeneity in diagnostic validity.重新审视精神症状：测量异质性在诊断效度中的作用。
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2025 Mar 19;47(2):20. doi: 10.1007/s40656-025-00659-5.
6
A Meta-Analysis of the Psychometric Properties of the ICD-11 Compatible Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form Plus, Modified (PID5BF+M).《国际疾病分类第11版兼容的DSM-5简短形式加修订版人格量表（PID5BF+M）心理测量特性的荟萃分析》
Scand J Psychol. 2025 Feb 28. doi: 10.1111/sjop.13100.
7
A Systematic Review of Instruments to Identify Mental Health and Substance Use Problems Among Children in the Emergency Department.急诊科中用于识别儿童心理健康和物质使用问题的工具的系统评价
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 May;24(5):552-568. doi: 10.1111/acem.13162. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
8
Evaluating the Construct Validity and Sensitivity to Change of the Klenico Depression Domain in Psychotherapeutic Inpatient Care: Instrument Validation Study.评估心理治疗住院护理中Klenico抑郁领域的结构效度和对变化的敏感性：工具验证研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 24;9:e50504. doi: 10.2196/50504.
9
Development and validation of the Aarhus Structured Clinical Interview for Prolonged Grief Disorder in ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR (A-PGDi).《用于国际疾病分类第11版（ICD-11）和精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版修订版（DSM-5-TR）中持续性悲伤障碍的奥胡斯结构化临床访谈（A-PGDi）的开发与验证》
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2511373. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2511373. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
10
The 2014 Ontario Child Health Study Emotional Behavioural Scales (OCHS-EBS) Part I: A Checklist for Dimensional Measurement of Selected Disorders.2014 年安大略省儿童健康研究情绪行为量表（OCHS-EBS）第一部分：用于特定障碍的维度测量的检查表。
Can J Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;64(6):423-433. doi: 10.1177/0706743718808250. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
引用本文的文献
1
Severe PTSD or just PTSD?重度创伤后应激障碍还是单纯的创伤后应激障碍？
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2512671. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2512671. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
本文引用的文献
1
Differential symptom weighting in estimating empirical thresholds for underlying PTSD severity: Toward a "platinum" standard for diagnosis?在估计潜在 PTSD 严重程度的经验阈值时对症状进行差异加权：是否朝着诊断的“白金”标准迈进？
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2023 Sep;32(3):e1963. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1963. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
2
Psychometric properties of sum scores and factor scores differ even when their correlation is 0.98: A response to Widaman and Revelle.即使总分和因子分数的相关系数为 0.98，它们的心理计量学特性也会有所不同：对 Widaman 和 Revelle 的回应。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Dec;55(8):4269-4290. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-02016-x. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
3
Estimating posttraumatic stress disorder severity in the presence of differential item functioning across populations, comorbidities, and interview measures: Introduction to Project Harmony.在人群、共病和访谈测量中存在不同项目功能的情况下，估计创伤后应激障碍的严重程度：项目和谐介绍。
J Trauma Stress. 2022 Jun;35(3):926-940. doi: 10.1002/jts.22800. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
4
Crossover between diagnostic and empirical categorizations of full and subthreshold PTSD.创伤后应激障碍全症和亚症的诊断分类与经验分类的交叉。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Sep 1;274:832-840. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.031. Epub 2020 May 24.
5
636,120 Ways to Have Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.636120 种创伤后应激障碍的方式。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 Nov;8(6):651-62. doi: 10.1177/1745691613504115.
Zotero 插件