Greenall M J, Froome K, Evans M, Pollock A V
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1979 Sep;5(5):511-6. doi: 10.1093/jac/5.5.511.
Two hundred and thirty consecutive patients undergoing laparotomy were randomly allocated to one of three single-dose intra-incisional prophylactic regimens: clindamycin, clindamycin plus cephaloridine, and cephaloridine alone. Wounds were classified on a bacteriological basis into four groups: clean, potentially contaminated, lightly contaminated and heavily contaminated. The first two of these groups had a low incidence of wound sepsis (6.6%), the third an incidence of 19.7% and the last of 53.1%. In the latter two groups clindamycin was a significantly less effective prophylactic than cephaloridine, and the combination of the two antibiotics was no more efficacious than cephaloridine alone. The high in vitro activity of cindamycin against Bacteroides species was not mirrored in vivo.
230例连续接受剖腹手术的患者被随机分配至三种单剂量切口内预防性用药方案之一:克林霉素、克林霉素加头孢菌素、单独使用头孢菌素。根据细菌学将伤口分为四组:清洁、可能污染、轻度污染和重度污染。前两组伤口败血症发生率较低(6.6%),第三组发生率为19.7%,最后一组为53.1%。在后两组中,克林霉素作为预防性用药的效果明显低于头孢菌素,两种抗生素联合使用并不比单独使用头孢菌素更有效。克林霉素在体外对拟杆菌属的高活性在体内并未体现。