• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国针对糖尿病和心血管疾病成人患者采用患者参与策略及支出情况。

US practice adoption of patient-engagement strategies and spending for adults with diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

作者信息

Rodriguez Hector P, Rubio Karl, Miller-Rosales Chris, Wood Andrew J

机构信息

Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, 2121 Berkeley Way West #5427, Berkeley, CA 94704, United States.

Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115, United States.

出版信息

Health Aff Sch. 2023 Jun 20;1(1):qxad021. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxad021. eCollection 2023 Jul.

DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxad021
PMID:38770409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11103728/
Abstract

Patient-engagement strategies are being encouraged by payers and governments, but with limited evidence about whether practice adoption of these strategies impacts utilization and spending. We examine the association of physician practice adoption of patient-engagement strategies (low vs moderate vs high) with potentially preventable utilization and total spending for patients with type 2 diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease using US physician practice survey (n = 2086) and Medicare fee-for-service (n = 736 269) data. In adjusted analyses, there were no differences in potentially preventable utilization associated with practice adoption of patient-engagement strategies. Compared with patients attributed to practices with moderate adoption, patients attributed to practices with high adoption had higher total spending ($26 364 vs $25 991; < .05) driven by spending for long-term services and supports, including home health agency, long-term care, skilled nursing facilities, and hospice payments. In contrast, patients attributed to practices with low adoption had higher total spending ($26 481 vs $25 991; < .01) driven by spending for tests and acute care and clinical access spending. The results highlight that stakeholders that encourage the use of patient-engagement strategies should not necessarily expect reduced spending.

摘要

支付方和政府都在鼓励采用患者参与策略,但关于这些策略在实际应用中是否会影响医疗服务利用率和支出的证据有限。我们利用美国医生执业调查(n = 2086)和医疗保险按服务付费(n = 736269)数据,研究了医生执业机构采用患者参与策略的程度(低、中、高)与2型糖尿病和/或心血管疾病患者潜在可预防的医疗服务利用率及总支出之间的关联。在调整分析中,采用患者参与策略的执业机构在潜在可预防的医疗服务利用率方面没有差异。与中等采用程度的执业机构的患者相比,高采用程度的执业机构的患者总支出更高(26364美元对25991美元;P<0.05),这是由长期服务和支持方面的支出推动的,包括家庭健康机构、长期护理、专业护理机构和临终关怀支付。相比之下,低采用程度的执业机构的患者总支出更高(26481美元对25991美元;P<0.01),这是由检查、急性护理和临床就诊支出推动的。研究结果表明,鼓励使用患者参与策略的利益相关者不一定能预期支出会减少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c36/11103728/63f5edfdde20/qxad021f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c36/11103728/63f5edfdde20/qxad021f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c36/11103728/63f5edfdde20/qxad021f1.jpg

相似文献

1
US practice adoption of patient-engagement strategies and spending for adults with diabetes and cardiovascular disease.美国针对糖尿病和心血管疾病成人患者采用患者参与策略及支出情况。
Health Aff Sch. 2023 Jun 20;1(1):qxad021. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxad021. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Association of patient engagement strategies with utilisation and spending for musculoskeletal problems in the USA: a cross-sectional analysis of Medicare patients and physician practices.美国患者参与策略与肌肉骨骼问题的利用和支出的关联:对医疗保险患者和医生实践的横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 26;11(11):e053121. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053121.
3
Adoption of Patient Engagement Strategies by Physician Practices in the United States.美国医师执业机构采用患者参与策略。
Med Care. 2022 Sep 1;60(9):691-699. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001748. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
4
5
Linking Practice Adoption of Patient Engagement Strategies and Relational Coordination to Patient-Reported Outcomes in Accountable Care Organizations.将患者参与策略和关系协调的实践采用与问责制医疗组织中的患者报告结果联系起来。
Milbank Q. 2019 Sep;97(3):692-735. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12400. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
6
Regional Variation in Physician Adoption of Antipsychotics: Impact on US Medicare Expenditures.医生对抗精神病药物使用的地区差异:对美国医疗保险支出的影响。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2016 Jun;19(2):69-78.
7
8
Continuity of Care and Health Care Utilization in Older Adults With Dementia in Fee-for-Service Medicare.按服务收费的医疗保险中患有痴呆症的老年人的连续护理与医疗保健利用情况
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Sep 1;176(9):1371-8. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.3553.
9
Organizational integration, practice capabilities, and outcomes in clinically complex medicare beneficiaries.临床情况复杂的医疗保险受益人的组织整合、实践能力和结果。
Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec;55 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):1085-1097. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13580. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
10
Effects of the Million Hearts Model on Myocardial Infarctions, Strokes, and Medicare Spending: A Randomized Clinical Trial.百万心脏模型对心肌梗死、卒中和医疗保险支出的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2023 Oct 17;330(15):1437-1447. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.19597.

引用本文的文献

1
How effective are allied health group interventions for the management of adults with long-term conditions? An umbrella review of systematic reviews and its applicability to the Australian primary health system.联合健康团队干预措施对长期病患者管理的效果如何?系统评价的伞式综述及其对澳大利亚初级卫生系统的适用性。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Sep 4;25(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02570-7.

本文引用的文献

1
What helps the successful implementation of digital decision aids supporting shared decision-making in cardiovascular diseases? A systematic review.什么有助于支持心血管疾病共同决策的数字决策辅助工具的成功实施?一项系统评价。
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2022 Nov 10;4(1):53-62. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztac070. eCollection 2023 Jan.
2
Discussing Cost and Value in Patient Decision Aids and Shared Decision Making: A Call to Action.探讨患者决策辅助工具和共同决策中的成本与价值:行动呼吁。
MDM Policy Pract. 2023 Jan 10;8(1):23814683221148651. doi: 10.1177/23814683221148651. eCollection 2023 Jan-Jun.
3
Adoption of Patient Engagement Strategies by Physician Practices in the United States.
美国医师执业机构采用患者参与策略。
Med Care. 2022 Sep 1;60(9):691-699. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001748. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
4
Reduction of cardiovascular risk factors among young men with hypertension using an interactive decision aid: cluster-randomized control trial.利用互动式决策辅助工具降低高血压年轻男性的心血管风险因素:群组随机对照试验。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Nov 16;21(1):543. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02339-1.
5
Effect of Individualized Preventive Care Recommendations vs Usual Care on Patient Interest and Use of Recommendations: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.个体化预防保健建议与常规护理对患者接受和使用建议的影响:一项试点随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2131455. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.31455.
6
Decision aids for shared decision-making and appropriate anticoagulation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.心房颤动患者共同决策和适当抗凝治疗的决策辅助工具:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2022 Mar 3;21(2):97-106. doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvab085.
7
Telehealth delivery of motivational interviewing for diabetes management: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.通过远程医疗提供动机性访谈以管理糖尿病:随机对照试验的系统评价
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Apr;105(4):805-820. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.07.036. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
8
Beyond hemoglobin A1c: a videographic analysis of conversations about quality of life and treatment burden during clinical encounters for diabetes care.超越糖化血红蛋白:糖尿病临床诊疗中关于生活质量和治疗负担的视频分析。
Endocrine. 2021 Sep;73(3):573-579. doi: 10.1007/s12020-021-02757-3. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
9
Patient Work and Treatment Burden in Type 2 Diabetes: A Mixed-Methods Study.2型糖尿病患者的工作与治疗负担:一项混合方法研究
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2021 Apr 8;5(2):359-367. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.01.006. eCollection 2021 Apr.
10
Financial burden, distress, and toxicity in cardiovascular disease.心血管疾病的经济负担、痛苦和毒性。
Am Heart J. 2021 Aug;238:75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.04.011. Epub 2021 May 5.