• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可吸收缝线与不可吸收缝线:哪一种效果更好?

Absorbable vs. non-absorbable suture: which one gives better results?

机构信息

Clinic for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia.

Medical Faculty Novi Sad, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2024 Oct;193(5):2341-2348. doi: 10.1007/s11845-024-03710-9. Epub 2024 May 21.

DOI:10.1007/s11845-024-03710-9
PMID:38771464
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is no ideal suture material or ideal sewing technique. The type of suture material affects the quality of the scars. Patient and surgeon satisfaction with the quality and comfort of the scar is one of the main goals of modern surgery.

AIMS

This study aims to compare the quality of scars and patient satisfaction after using two different types of sutures.

METHODS

This research was conducted as a prospective study that included 64 patients whose surgical wounds were closed with intradermal suture using different suturing materials according to which the patients were divided into two groups: absorbable - Monocryle (32) and non-absorbable - DemeLENE suture (32). POSAS scale and an ultrasound machine were used to assess the scars. The doctor and the patient evaluated seven parameters on two occasions, after 2 and 6 weeks after the surgery.

RESULTS

The statistically significant advantage was found after 2 weeks in scars sewn with non-resorptive suture in terms of elasticity, doctor's general impression, pain, itching, color, stiffness, thickness, irregularity, and patient's general impression. After 6 weeks, statistically significantly better results were shown on scars sewn with non-resorptive thread for the parameters doctor's general impression, itching, irregularity, and patient's general impression.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-resorptive sutures show statistically significantly better results, especially after 2 weeks from the patient's point of view so we consider them more comfortable and convenient to use.

摘要

背景

目前尚无理想的缝合材料或理想的缝合技术。缝合材料的类型会影响疤痕的质量。患者和外科医生对疤痕质量和舒适度的满意度是现代手术的主要目标之一。

目的

本研究旨在比较使用两种不同类型缝线后的疤痕质量和患者满意度。

方法

这是一项前瞻性研究,共纳入 64 例手术切口采用皮内缝合的患者,根据缝线类型将患者分为两组:可吸收缝线 - 单丝(Monocryle)(32 例)和不可吸收缝线 - DemeLENE 缝线(32 例)。使用 POSAS 量表和超声仪评估疤痕。医生和患者在手术后 2 周和 6 周两次评估 7 个参数。

结果

在术后 2 周时,使用不可吸收缝线缝合的疤痕在弹性、医生总体印象、疼痛、瘙痒、颜色、硬度、厚度、不规则和患者总体印象方面具有统计学显著优势。在术后 6 周时,使用不可吸收缝线缝合的疤痕在医生总体印象、瘙痒、不规则和患者总体印象方面表现出统计学上更好的结果。

结论

不可吸收缝线的效果更好,尤其是从患者的角度来看,2 周后差异更明显,因此我们认为它们更舒适、更方便使用。

相似文献

1
Absorbable vs. non-absorbable suture: which one gives better results?可吸收缝线与不可吸收缝线:哪一种效果更好?
Ir J Med Sci. 2024 Oct;193(5):2341-2348. doi: 10.1007/s11845-024-03710-9. Epub 2024 May 21.
2
Continuous absorbable intradermal sutures yield better cosmetic results than nonabsorbable interrupted sutures in open appendectomy wounds: a prospective, randomized trial.在开放性阑尾切除术后伤口中,连续可吸收皮内缝合线比不可吸收间断缝合线产生更好的美容效果:一项前瞻性随机试验。
World J Surg. 2014 May;38(5):1044-50. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2396-8.
3
Clinical application of absorbable collagen thread and cosmetic suture technique in emergency treatment of children's facial trauma.可吸收胶原线和美容缝合技术在儿童面部创伤急诊治疗中的临床应用。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2022 Nov;58(11):2039-2043. doi: 10.1111/jpc.16147. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
4
Absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for skin closure after carpal tunnel decompression surgery.腕管减压术后皮肤缝合用可吸收缝线与不可吸收缝线的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 1;2(2):CD011757. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011757.pub2.
5
Continuous versus interrupted skin sutures for non-obstetric surgery.非产科手术中连续缝合与间断缝合皮肤的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 14;2014(2):CD010365. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010365.pub2.
6
Absorbable Versus Non-Absorbable Sutures in Open Rhinoplasty: Analysis of Columellar Scarring.可吸收缝线与不可吸收缝线在开放式鼻整形术中的应用:鼻中隔瘢痕分析。
J Craniofac Surg. 2021 May 1;32(3):1075-1078. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007355.
7
Prevention of scar spread on trunk excisions: a rater-blinded randomized controlled trial.预防躯干切除术瘢痕扩散:一项盲法随机对照试验。
JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Jun;149(6):687-91. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.3004.
8
Intradermal absorbable sutures to close pilonidal sinus wounds: a safe closure method?用于闭合藏毛窦伤口的皮内可吸收缝线:一种安全的闭合方法?
Surg Today. 2014 Sep;44(9):1638-42. doi: 10.1007/s00595-013-0741-z.
9
A randomised clinical trial to compare octyl cyanoacrylate with absorbable monofilament sutures for the closure of laparoscopic cholecystectomy port incisions.一项比较辛基氰基丙烯酸酯和可吸收单丝缝线用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术切口闭合的随机临床试验。
Int Wound J. 2020 Apr;17(2):449-454. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13294. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
10
Comparison of various methods and materials for treatment of skin laceration by a 3-dimensional measuring technique in a pig experiment.在猪实验中运用三维测量技术比较治疗皮肤裂伤的各种方法和材料
Ann Plast Surg. 2007 May;58(5):566-72. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000245135.58229.e7.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact on quality-of-life following treatment of surgical facial scars with laser-based therapy: a scoping review.基于激光的疗法治疗面部手术疤痕对生活质量的影响:范围综述。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2023 Dec 16;316(1):47. doi: 10.1007/s00403-023-02779-z.
2
Surgical wounds in reduction mammoplasty: a comparison of Monocryl and Prolene sutures on scars.乳房缩小整形术中的手术切口:单乔缝线和可吸收缝线对瘢痕的比较。
J Wound Care. 2021 Aug 2;30(8):626-630. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2021.30.8.626.
3
Dermatological surgery: an update on suture materials and techniques. Part 1.
皮肤科手术:缝线材料和技术的最新进展。第 1 部分。
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2021 Dec;46(8):1400-1410. doi: 10.1111/ced.14770. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
4
Reliability of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in Evaluating Linear Scars after Thyroidectomy.患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表在评价甲状腺切除术后线性瘢痕中的可靠性。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2021 Jun 1;34(6):1-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000744344.46898.6e.
5
Daily Quality-of-life Impact of Scars: An Interview-based Foundational Study of Patient-reported Themes.疤痕对日常生活质量的影响:一项基于访谈的患者报告主题基础研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Apr 15;9(4):e3522. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003522. eCollection 2021 Apr.
6
Modified Buried Vertical Mattress Suture Versus Buried Intradermal Suture: A Prospective Split-Scar Study.改良埋置垂直褥式缝合与埋置皮内缝合:一项前瞻性双切口研究
Dermatol Surg. 2021 Mar 1;47(3):e75-e80. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002642.
7
Comparison of Rapid Absorbable Sutures with Nonabsorbable Sutures in Closing Transcolumellar Incision in Septorhinoplasty: Short-term Outcomes.鼻中隔成形术中经鼻中隔切口采用可吸收缝线与不可吸收缝线缝合的对比:短期结果。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020 Oct;44(5):1759-1765. doi: 10.1007/s00266-020-01864-2. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
8
Evaluating Current Scar Assessment Methods.评估当前的瘢痕评估方法。
Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Feb;84(2):222-231. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002029.
9
Comparison of four different suture materials in respect to oral wound healing, microbial colonization, tissue reaction and clinical features-randomized clinical study.四种不同缝合材料在口腔伤口愈合、微生物定植、组织反应和临床特征方面的比较——随机临床研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Apr;24(4):1527-1541. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03034-4. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
10
Evaluation of the effect of the accordion suturing technique on wound lengths in breast cancer surgery: a randomised clinical trial.评估手风琴缝合技术对乳腺癌手术伤口长度的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Ir J Med Sci. 2018 Nov;187(4):901-906. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1772-7. Epub 2018 Mar 21.