• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估手风琴缝合技术对乳腺癌手术伤口长度的影响:一项随机临床试验。

Evaluation of the effect of the accordion suturing technique on wound lengths in breast cancer surgery: a randomised clinical trial.

作者信息

Ita Michael, Koh Kevin, Butt Abeeda, KaimKhani Shaheed, Kelly Louise, O'Sullivan Martin J, Redmond Henry Paul, Corrigan Mark A

机构信息

Cork Breast Cancer Research Centre, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.

Department of Academic Surgery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2018 Nov;187(4):901-906. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1772-7. Epub 2018 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1007/s11845-018-1772-7
PMID:29564720
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cosmetic outcomes and scar lengths remain important considerations in breast cancer surgery. Suturing techniques should decrease scar tissue formation and provide good cosmetic results. The use of an accordion suturing technique may result in decreased surgical wound lengths and better cosmetic outcomes. We compared the outcomes of the accordion suturing technique with the standard suturing technique in breast cancer surgeries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Female patients undergoing wide local excision of breast cancers were randomised to undergo closure of their surgical wound by either the accordion or the non-accordion (standard) suturing techniques between the months of May and October 2015. Pre-closure and post-closure wound lengths were measured intra-operatively. The primary outcome was a reduction of the surgical wound length at 6 weeks. The secondary outcome was a composite of the absence of hypertrophic scar tissue formation and optimal cosmesis.

RESULTS

Thirty eligible women for wide local excision of breast tumours were randomly assigned to the accordion and non-accordion groups (15 accordion and 15 non-accordion). Seven women were excluded from the study because they underwent re-excision of margins for their breast tumours before the end of 6 weeks, and one woman was lost to follow-up. We therefore compared the outcomes of 12 women who underwent closure of their surgical wound by way of the accordion suturing technique to the outcomes of 10 women who underwent closure with the non-accordion (standard) suturing technique. The percentage reduction of wound length at 6 weeks was significantly greater in the accordion group than in the non-accordion group (M = 24.4, SD = 10.2 vs. M = 8.6, SD = 11.5, p = 0.0026). There was no significant difference in the cosmetic outcome between both groups using the James Quinn's wound evaluation score.

CONCLUSION

The accordion suturing technique was associated with a significant reduction in surgical wound lengths in breast conserving surgery at 6 weeks without compromising the cosmetic result.

摘要

背景

在乳腺癌手术中,美容效果和瘢痕长度仍是重要的考量因素。缝合技术应减少瘢痕组织形成并提供良好的美容效果。使用手风琴式缝合技术可能会缩短手术伤口长度并带来更好的美容效果。我们比较了手风琴式缝合技术与标准缝合技术在乳腺癌手术中的效果。

材料与方法

2015年5月至10月期间,接受乳腺癌广泛局部切除的女性患者被随机分为两组,分别采用手风琴式或非手风琴式(标准)缝合技术闭合手术伤口。术中测量闭合前后的伤口长度。主要结局是6周时手术伤口长度的缩短。次要结局是无肥厚性瘢痕组织形成且美容效果最佳。

结果

30名符合条件的接受乳腺肿瘤广泛局部切除的女性被随机分配到手风琴组和非手风琴组(每组15人)。7名女性因在6周结束前对乳腺肿瘤边缘进行了再次切除而被排除在研究之外,1名女性失访。因此,我们比较了12名采用手风琴式缝合技术闭合手术伤口的女性与10名采用非手风琴式(标准)缝合技术闭合伤口的女性的结局。手风琴组6周时伤口长度的减少百分比显著高于非手风琴组(M = 24.4,SD = 10.2 vs. M = 8.6,SD = 11.5,p = 0.0026)。使用詹姆斯·奎因伤口评估评分,两组在美容效果上无显著差异。

结论

手风琴式缝合技术在6周时与保乳手术中手术伤口长度的显著缩短相关,且不影响美容效果。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the effect of the accordion suturing technique on wound lengths in breast cancer surgery: a randomised clinical trial.评估手风琴缝合技术对乳腺癌手术伤口长度的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Ir J Med Sci. 2018 Nov;187(4):901-906. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1772-7. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
2
Effect of Adhesive Strips and Dermal Sutures vs Dermal Sutures Only on Wound Closure: A Randomized Clinical Trial.粘贴条与皮肤缝线联合应用及单纯皮肤缝线对伤口闭合的影响:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Dermatol. 2015 Aug;151(8):862-7. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.0174.
3
A randomized trial between different suture materials (polydioxanone vs. poliglecaprone 25) and different suturing techniques (running subcuticular suture alone vs. with running horizontal mattress) in prevention of hypertrophic scar development in median sternotomy wound.一项关于不同缝合材料(聚二氧六环酮与聚乙醇酸交酯25)和不同缝合技术(单纯连续皮下缝合与连续水平褥式缝合联合)预防正中开胸伤口肥厚性瘢痕形成的随机试验。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 Aug;97 Suppl 8:S88-94.
4
A prospective randomised controlled trial of octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive and standard suture for wound closure following breast surgery.一项关于氰基丙烯酸正辛酯组织粘合剂与标准缝线用于乳腺手术后伤口闭合的前瞻性随机对照试验。
Hong Kong Med J. 2016 Jun;22(3):216-22. doi: 10.12809/hkmj154513. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
5
Primary closure versus non-closure of dog bite wounds. a randomised controlled trial.犬咬伤伤口的一期缝合与不缝合:一项随机对照试验。
Injury. 2014 Jan;45(1):237-40. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.07.010. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
6
Comparison of Running Cutaneous Suture Spacing During Linear Wound Closures and the Effect on Wound Cosmesis of the Face and Neck: A Randomized Clinical Trial.线性伤口闭合时切口皮内缝合间距的比较及其对面颈部伤口美容效果的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Dermatol. 2019 Mar 1;155(3):321-326. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.5057.
7
Late side-effects and cosmetic results of accelerated partial breast irradiation with interstitial brachytherapy versus whole-breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery for low-risk invasive and in-situ carcinoma of the female breast: 5-year results of a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.保乳手术后低危型女性乳腺浸润性癌和原位癌的加速部分乳腺照射与全乳照射的晚期副反应和美容效果:一项随机、对照、3 期临床试验的 5 年结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Feb;18(2):259-268. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30011-6. Epub 2017 Jan 14.
8
Is There an Advantage to Knotless Barbed Suture in TKA Wound Closure? A Randomized Trial in Simultaneous Bilateral TKAs.全膝关节置换术伤口闭合中使用免打结倒刺缝线有优势吗?双侧同期全膝关节置换术的随机试验
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):2019-27. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4157-5. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
9
Set-back versus buried vertical mattress suturing: results of a randomized blinded trial.后移与埋没垂直褥式缝合的比较:一项随机盲法试验的结果。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Apr;72(4):674-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.07.018. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
10
Efficacy of 'radioguided occult lesion localisation' (ROLL) versus 'wire-guided localisation' (WGL) in breast conserving surgery for non-palpable breast cancer: a randomised controlled multicentre trial.“放射性示踪隐匿性病灶定位”(ROLL)与“导丝定位”(WGL)在不可触及乳腺癌保乳手术中的疗效比较:一项随机对照多中心试验。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Nov;136(2):469-78. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2225-z. Epub 2012 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Absorbable vs. non-absorbable suture: which one gives better results?可吸收缝线与不可吸收缝线:哪一种效果更好?
Ir J Med Sci. 2024 Oct;193(5):2341-2348. doi: 10.1007/s11845-024-03710-9. Epub 2024 May 21.
2
Prevalence, Clinical Significance and Risk Factors for Developing Scar Pain and Sensibility Disorders in Breast Cancer Patients after Breast-Conserving Therapy and Mastectomy.保乳治疗和乳房切除术后乳腺癌患者瘢痕疼痛和感觉障碍的发生率、临床意义及危险因素
Breast Care (Basel). 2021 Oct;16(5):507-515. doi: 10.1159/000513241. Epub 2020 Dec 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Rasch analysis of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) in burn scars.烧伤瘢痕患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)的 Rasch 分析。
Qual Life Res. 2012 Feb;21(1):13-23. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9924-5. Epub 2011 May 20.
2
Reliable and feasible evaluation of linear scars by the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale.采用患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表对线性瘢痕进行可靠且可行的评估。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Aug;116(2):514-22. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000172982.43599.d6.
3
The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation.
患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表:一种用于瘢痕评估的可靠且可行的工具。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jun;113(7):1960-5; discussion 1966-7. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000122207.28773.56.
4
Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer.一项比较全乳切除术、乳房肿瘤切除术以及乳房肿瘤切除术加放疗治疗浸润性乳腺癌的随机试验的20年随访。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct 17;347(16):1233-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022152.
5
Laceration management.撕裂伤处理
Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Sep;34(3):356-67. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70131-9.
6
An assessment of clinical wound evaluation scales.临床伤口评估量表的评估
Acad Emerg Med. 1998 Jun;5(6):583-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02465.x.
7
Patient self-evaluation of cosmetic outcome of breast-preserving cancer treatment.保乳癌症治疗美容效果的患者自我评估。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1985 Oct;11(10):1849-52. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(85)90044-6.