Szenkurök Viktoria, Weber Daniela, Bilger Marcel
Health Economics and Policy, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna, Austria.
Population and Just Societies Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital (IIASA, OeAW, Univ. Vienna), Laxenburg, Austria.
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2025 Mar;25(1):87-106. doi: 10.1007/s10754-024-09378-z. Epub 2024 May 21.
The rising number of older adults with limitations in their daily activities has major implications for the demands placed on long-term care (LTC) systems across Europe. Recognizing that demand can be both constrained and encouraged by individual and country-specific factors, this study explains the uptake of home-based long-term care in 18 European countries with LTC policies and pension generosity along with individual factors such as socioeconomic status. Using data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe conducted in 2019, we apply a two-part multilevel model to assess if disparities in use of LTC are driven by disparities in needs or disparities in use of care when in need. While individual characteristics largely affect the use of care through its association with disparities in need, country-level characteristics are important for the use of care when in need. In particular, the better health of wealthier and more educated individuals makes them less likely to use any type of home-based personal care. At the country level, results show that the absence of a means-tested benefit scheme and the availability of cash-for-care benefits (as opposed to in-kind) are strongly associated with the use of formal care, whether it is mixed (with informal care) or exclusive. LTC policies are, however, shown to be insufficient to significantly reduce unmet needs for personal care. Conversely, generous pensions are significantly associated with lower unmet needs, underscoring the importance of considering the likely adverse effects of future pension reforms.
日常活动受限的老年人数量不断增加,这对欧洲各地长期护理(LTC)系统的需求产生了重大影响。认识到需求可能受到个人和国家特定因素的限制与推动,本研究解释了18个拥有长期护理政策和养老金慷慨程度的欧洲国家以及社会经济地位等个人因素对居家长期护理的采用情况。利用2019年欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查的数据,我们应用两部分多层次模型来评估长期护理使用方面的差异是由需求差异还是需求时护理使用差异所驱动。虽然个人特征主要通过与需求差异的关联来影响护理使用,但国家层面的特征对于需求时的护理使用很重要。特别是,较富裕和受教育程度较高的个人健康状况较好,这使得他们使用任何类型居家个人护理的可能性较小。在国家层面,结果表明,缺乏经济状况调查福利计划以及现金护理福利(而非实物福利)的可用性与正式护理的使用密切相关,无论是混合(与非正式护理)还是单独使用。然而,长期护理政策被证明不足以显著减少个人护理未满足的需求。相反,慷慨的养老金与较低的未满足需求显著相关,这突出了考虑未来养老金改革可能产生的不利影响的重要性。