• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲非正式和正式长期护理的使用情况及未满足的需求:审视老年人的社会经济差异及社会政策的作用

Informal and formal long-term care utilization and unmet needs in Europe: examining socioeconomic disparities and the role of social policies for older adults.

作者信息

Szenkurök Viktoria, Weber Daniela, Bilger Marcel

机构信息

Health Economics and Policy, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna, Austria.

Population and Just Societies Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital (IIASA, OeAW, Univ. Vienna), Laxenburg, Austria.

出版信息

Int J Health Econ Manag. 2025 Mar;25(1):87-106. doi: 10.1007/s10754-024-09378-z. Epub 2024 May 21.

DOI:10.1007/s10754-024-09378-z
PMID:38772952
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12003520/
Abstract

The rising number of older adults with limitations in their daily activities has major implications for the demands placed on long-term care (LTC) systems across Europe. Recognizing that demand can be both constrained and encouraged by individual and country-specific factors, this study explains the uptake of home-based long-term care in 18 European countries with LTC policies and pension generosity along with individual factors such as socioeconomic status. Using data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe conducted in 2019, we apply a two-part multilevel model to assess if disparities in use of LTC are driven by disparities in needs or disparities in use of care when in need. While individual characteristics largely affect the use of care through its association with disparities in need, country-level characteristics are important for the use of care when in need. In particular, the better health of wealthier and more educated individuals makes them less likely to use any type of home-based personal care. At the country level, results show that the absence of a means-tested benefit scheme and the availability of cash-for-care benefits (as opposed to in-kind) are strongly associated with the use of formal care, whether it is mixed (with informal care) or exclusive. LTC policies are, however, shown to be insufficient to significantly reduce unmet needs for personal care. Conversely, generous pensions are significantly associated with lower unmet needs, underscoring the importance of considering the likely adverse effects of future pension reforms.

摘要

日常活动受限的老年人数量不断增加,这对欧洲各地长期护理(LTC)系统的需求产生了重大影响。认识到需求可能受到个人和国家特定因素的限制与推动,本研究解释了18个拥有长期护理政策和养老金慷慨程度的欧洲国家以及社会经济地位等个人因素对居家长期护理的采用情况。利用2019年欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查的数据,我们应用两部分多层次模型来评估长期护理使用方面的差异是由需求差异还是需求时护理使用差异所驱动。虽然个人特征主要通过与需求差异的关联来影响护理使用,但国家层面的特征对于需求时的护理使用很重要。特别是,较富裕和受教育程度较高的个人健康状况较好,这使得他们使用任何类型居家个人护理的可能性较小。在国家层面,结果表明,缺乏经济状况调查福利计划以及现金护理福利(而非实物福利)的可用性与正式护理的使用密切相关,无论是混合(与非正式护理)还是单独使用。然而,长期护理政策被证明不足以显著减少个人护理未满足的需求。相反,慷慨的养老金与较低的未满足需求显著相关,这突出了考虑未来养老金改革可能产生的不利影响的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/590e/12003520/e82cd7316bf1/10754_2024_9378_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/590e/12003520/e82cd7316bf1/10754_2024_9378_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/590e/12003520/e82cd7316bf1/10754_2024_9378_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Informal and formal long-term care utilization and unmet needs in Europe: examining socioeconomic disparities and the role of social policies for older adults.欧洲非正式和正式长期护理的使用情况及未满足的需求:审视老年人的社会经济差异及社会政策的作用
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2025 Mar;25(1):87-106. doi: 10.1007/s10754-024-09378-z. Epub 2024 May 21.
2
Socioeconomic Inequalities in Home-Care Use Across Regional Long-term Care Systems in Europe.欧洲各地区长期照护系统中家庭护理使用的社会经济不平等。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Jan 1;76(1):121-132. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa139.
3
Socioeconomic Inequality in the Use of Long-Term Care among European Older Adults: An Empirical Approach Using the SHARE Survey.欧洲老年人长期护理利用中的社会经济不平等:使用 SHARE 调查的实证方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 22;18(1):20. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010020.
4
Fairness and Eligibility to Long-Term Care: An Analysis of the Factors Driving Inequality and Inequity in the Use of Home Care for Older Europeans.长期护理的公平性与资格:对影响欧洲老年人家庭护理使用方面不平等和不公平的驱动因素的分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 14;14(10):1224. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101224.
5
Does Long-Term Care Insurance Release the Unmet Long-Term Care Needs and Promote Long-Term Care Services? A Quasi-Experimental Study in China.长期护理保险能否释放未满足的长期护理需求并促进长期护理服务?一项中国的准实验研究。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2025 May;40(3):646-654. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3907. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
6
Sustainability of Long-term Care: Puzzling Tasks Ahead for Policy-Makers.长期护理的可持续性:政策制定者面临的棘手任务。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Apr 1;6(4):195-205. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.109.
7
Unmet needs and the effect of healthcare system generosity on prevention activity - A multilevel analysis.未满足的需求与医疗保健系统慷慨程度对预防活动的影响——多层次分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Jan;340:116473. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116473. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
8
Care choices in Europe: To Each According to His or Her Needs?欧洲的护理选择:按需分配?
Inquiry. 2018 Jan-Dec;55:46958018780848. doi: 10.1177/0046958018780848.
9
Inequity in long-term care use and unmet need: two sides of the same coin.长期护理使用方面的不平等与未满足的需求:同一硬币的两面。
J Health Econ. 2015 Jan;39:147-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.11.004. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
10
Demand of long-term care and benefit eligibility across European countries.欧洲各国对长期护理的需求和受益资格。
Health Econ. 2018 Aug;27(8):1175-1188. doi: 10.1002/hec.3665. Epub 2018 Apr 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Defining Long-Term-Care Need Levels for Older Adults: Towards a Standardized European Classification.界定老年人长期护理需求水平:迈向标准化的欧洲分类
J Aging Soc Policy. 2023 Nov 2;35(6):723-742. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2022.2110810. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
2
Socioeconomic status and ADL disability of the older adults: Cumulative health effects, social outcomes and impact mechanisms.老年人的社会经济地位和日常生活活动能力障碍:累积健康影响、社会结果和影响机制。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 10;17(2):e0262808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262808. eCollection 2022.
3
Changes in home care clients' characteristics and home care in five European countries from 2001 to 2014: comparison based on InterRAI - Home Care data.
2001 年至 2014 年五个欧洲国家居家护理客户特征和居家护理的变化:基于 InterRAI-居家护理数据的比较。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 29;21(1):1177. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07197-3.
4
Wealth and the utilization of long-term care services: evidence from the United States.财富与长期护理服务的利用:来自美国的证据。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2021 Sep;21(3):345-366. doi: 10.1007/s10754-021-09299-1. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
5
Worlds of long-term care: A typology of OECD countries.长期护理的世界:经合组织国家的类型学。
Health Policy. 2021 May;125(5):609-617. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.02.009. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
6
Health measures and long-term care use in the European frail population.欧洲脆弱人群的健康措施和长期护理使用情况。
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Apr;22(3):405-423. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01263-z. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
7
Socioeconomic Inequality in the Use of Long-Term Care among European Older Adults: An Empirical Approach Using the SHARE Survey.欧洲老年人长期护理利用中的社会经济不平等:使用 SHARE 调查的实证方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 22;18(1):20. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010020.
8
Validity of the Global Activity Limitation Indicator (GALI) to evaluate severity of disability.全球活动限制指标(GALI)评估残疾严重程度的有效性。
Eur J Public Health. 2021 Jul 13;31(3):539-540. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa214.
9
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (iADL) Limitations in Europe: An Assessment of SHARE Data.欧洲工具性日常生活活动(iADL)受限情况:SHARE 数据评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 10;17(20):7387. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207387.
10
Socioeconomic Inequalities in Home-Care Use Across Regional Long-term Care Systems in Europe.欧洲各地区长期照护系统中家庭护理使用的社会经济不平等。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Jan 1;76(1):121-132. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa139.