Suppr超能文献

欧洲老年人长期护理利用中的社会经济不平等:使用 SHARE 调查的实证方法。

Socioeconomic Inequality in the Use of Long-Term Care among European Older Adults: An Empirical Approach Using the SHARE Survey.

机构信息

Department of Economics & Group of Health Economics and Health Service Management, University of Cantabria-IDIVAL, Avenue Los Castros s/n, 39005 Santander, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 22;18(1):20. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010020.

Abstract

The increase in the proportion of elderly people in developed societies has several consequences, such as the rise in demand for long-term care (LTC). Due to cost, inequalities may arise and punish low-income households. Our objective is to examine socioeconomic inequalities in LTC utilization in Europe. We use the last wave from the Survey of Health, Aging, and Retirement in Europe SHARE (Munich Center for the Economics of Ageing, Munich, Germany), dated 2017, to analyze the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on LTC. For this purpose, we construct logistic models and control for socioeconomic/household characteristics, health status, and region. Then, concentration indices are calculated to assess the distribution of LTC. Moreover, we also analyze horizontal inequity by using the indirect need-standardization process. We use two measures of SES (household net total income and household net wealth) to obtain robust results. Our findings demonstrate that informal care is concentrated among low-SES households, whereas formal care is concentrated in high-SES households. The results for horizontal concentration indices show a pro-rich distribution in both formal and informal LTC. We add new empirical evidence by showing the dawning of deep social inequalities in LTC utilization. Policymakers should implement policies focused on people who need care to tackle socioeconomic inequalities in LTC.

摘要

发达国家老年人口比例的增加带来了一些后果,如长期护理(LTC)需求的增加。由于成本问题,可能会出现不平等现象,并惩罚低收入家庭。我们的目的是研究欧洲长期护理利用方面的社会经济不平等问题。我们使用了最新的欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查(SHARE)的最后一波数据(德国慕尼黑老龄化经济学研究中心,慕尼黑),分析了社会经济地位(SES)对长期护理的影响。为此,我们构建了逻辑模型,并控制了社会经济/家庭特征、健康状况和地区。然后,我们计算了集中指数来评估长期护理的分布情况。此外,我们还通过间接需求标准化过程分析了水平不公平问题。我们使用 SES 的两个衡量标准(家庭净总收入和家庭净财富)来获得稳健的结果。我们的研究结果表明,非正式护理主要集中在低 SES 家庭中,而正式护理则集中在高 SES 家庭中。水平集中指数的结果表明,正式和非正式长期护理的分配都偏向富裕阶层。我们通过展示长期护理利用方面日益加深的社会不平等现象,提供了新的经验证据。政策制定者应实施关注有需要的人的政策,以解决长期护理方面的社会经济不平等问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43a2/7792951/3e4c3c9fe30b/ijerph-18-00020-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验